PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
IGSU.L vs. ISAC.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

IGSU.L vs. ISAC.L

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

IGSU.L (iShares Dow Jones Global Sustainability Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and ISAC.L (iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both Global Equities funds from iShares - IGSU.L tracks the MSCI ACWI NR USD while ISAC.L tracks the MSCI ACWI Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IGSU.L returned 11.98%/yr vs 12.38%/yr for ISAC.L. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IGSU.L charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for ISAC.L.

Performance

IGSU.L vs. ISAC.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Dow Jones Global Sustainability Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IGSU.L) and iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ISAC.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IGSU.L achieves a 6.97% return, which is significantly lower than ISAC.L's 9.82% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IGSU.L having a 11.98% annualized return and ISAC.L not far ahead at 12.38%.

IGSU.L

1D
-1.75%
1M
1.19%
YTD
6.97%
6M
9.48%
1Y
20.59%
3Y*
17.29%
5Y*
10.24%
10Y*
11.98%

ISAC.L

1D
-1.54%
1M
0.93%
YTD
9.82%
6M
10.98%
1Y
26.38%
3Y*
20.54%
5Y*
11.04%
10Y*
12.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IGSU.L vs. ISAC.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IGSU.L
iShares Dow Jones Global Sustainability Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc)		6.97%22.56%10.93%26.36%-17.16%21.45%13.60%25.67%-8.24%22.16%
ISAC.L
iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD (Acc)		9.82%22.36%17.81%22.57%-18.16%18.85%15.66%25.75%-9.73%24.40%

Correlation

The correlation between IGSU.L and ISAC.L is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2011

0.93

The correlation between IGSU.L and ISAC.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

IGSU.L vs. ISAC.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
IGSU.L
ISAC.L

Technology

37.1%
33.9%

Financial Services

20.2%
17.3%

Industrials

12.5%
9.0%

Healthcare

8.9%
7.8%

Basic Materials

5.3%
2.9%

Energy

3.6%
3.6%

Consumer Cyclical

3.0%
8.5%

Utilities

3.0%
2.2%

Communication Services

2.6%
8.6%

Consumer Defensive

1.7%
4.4%

Real Estate

1.6%
1.2%

Technology

IGSU.L
37.1%
ISAC.L
33.9%

Financial Services

IGSU.L
20.2%
ISAC.L
17.3%

Industrials

IGSU.L
12.5%
ISAC.L
9.0%

Healthcare

IGSU.L
8.9%
ISAC.L
7.8%

Basic Materials

IGSU.L
5.3%
ISAC.L
2.9%

Energy

IGSU.L
3.6%
ISAC.L
3.6%

Consumer Cyclical

IGSU.L
3.0%
ISAC.L
8.5%

Utilities

IGSU.L
3.0%
ISAC.L
2.2%

Communication Services

IGSU.L
2.6%
ISAC.L
8.6%

Consumer Defensive

IGSU.L
1.7%
ISAC.L
4.4%

Real Estate

IGSU.L
1.6%
ISAC.L
1.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares Dow Jones Global Sustainability Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc)

iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD (Acc)

Often compared with IGSU.L:
IGSU.L vs. IGSG.ASIGSU.L vs. USML.LIGSU.L vs. GLRE.LIGSU.L vs. VUSA.LIGSU.L vs. GGRG.LIGSU.L vs. BOTZIGSU.L vs. VUAG.L
Often compared with ISAC.L:
ISAC.L vs. VWRA.LISAC.L vs. SSAC.LISAC.L vs. IWDA.LISAC.L vs. VTISAC.L vs. SWDA.LISAC.L vs. VOOISAC.L vs. SWRD.L

Return for Risk

IGSU.L vs. ISAC.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
IGSU.L
IGSU.L Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
IGSU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IGSU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
IGSU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
IGSU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
IGSU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
ISAC.L
ISAC.L Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
ISAC.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISAC.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISAC.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
ISAC.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISAC.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IGSU.L vs. ISAC.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Dow Jones Global Sustainability Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IGSU.L) and iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ISAC.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

IGSU.LISAC.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.58
2.10

-0.52

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.34
3.11

-0.77

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.38

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.18

3.00

-0.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.33

12.53

-4.20

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IGSU.L vs. ISAC.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IGSU.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.58, which is comparable to the ISAC.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IGSU.L and ISAC.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

IGSU.LISAC.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.58

2.10

-0.52

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

0.71

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

0.77

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

0.72

-0.16

Drawdowns

IGSU.L vs. ISAC.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IGSU.L drawdown since its inception was -33.33%, roughly equal to the maximum ISAC.L drawdown of -33.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGSU.L and ISAC.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

IGSU.LISAC.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.33%

-33.82%

+0.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.42%

-8.77%

-0.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.81%

-16.56%

+1.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.15%

-26.07%

-1.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.33%

-33.82%

+0.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.38%

-2.25%

-0.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.54%

-4.64%

-0.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.47%

2.10%

+0.37%

Volatility

IGSU.L vs. ISAC.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares Dow Jones Global Sustainability Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IGSU.L) and iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ISAC.L) have volatilities of 3.90% and 3.89%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

IGSU.LISAC.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.90%

3.89%

+0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.53%

9.90%

+0.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.94%

12.50%

+0.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.44%

15.58%

-0.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.87%

15.95%

-0.08%

IGSU.L vs. ISAC.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IGSU.L has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than ISAC.L's 0.20% expense ratio.

Dividends

IGSU.L vs. ISAC.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither IGSU.L nor ISAC.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

IGSU.L and ISAC.L have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ISAC.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ISAC.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for IGSU.L.

IGSU.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD, while ISAC.L tracks MSCI ACWI Index. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for IGSU.L and 0.20% for ISAC.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IGSU.L and ISAC.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer