IGSU.L vs. GLRE.L
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Dow Jones Global Sustainability Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IGSU.L) and SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate UCITS ETF (GLRE.L).
IGSU.L and GLRE.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IGSU.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI NR USD. It was launched on Feb 25, 2011. GLRE.L is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the FTSE EPRA Nareit Global TR USD. It was launched on Oct 23, 2012. Both IGSU.L and GLRE.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: IGSU.L or GLRE.L.
Key characteristics
| IGSU.L | GLRE.L | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 12.78% | 10.61% |
| 1Y Return | 21.66% | 21.70% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 7.49% | -0.30% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 12.07% | 1.67% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 8.51% | 3.82% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.89 | 1.30 |
| Daily Std Dev | 11.79% | 17.25% |
| Max Drawdown | -33.33% | -43.26% |
| Current Drawdown | -0.27% | -8.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between IGSU.L and GLRE.L is 0.63, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
IGSU.L vs. GLRE.L - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, IGSU.L achieves a 12.78% return, which is significantly higher than GLRE.L's 10.61% return. Over the past 10 years, IGSU.L has outperformed GLRE.L with an annualized return of 8.51%, while GLRE.L has yielded a comparatively lower 3.82% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IGSU.L vs. GLRE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IGSU.L has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than GLRE.L's 0.40% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
IGSU.L vs. GLRE.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Dow Jones Global Sustainability Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IGSU.L) and SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate UCITS ETF (GLRE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
IGSU.L vs. GLRE.L - Dividend Comparison
IGSU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GLRE.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.47%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGSU.L iShares Dow Jones Global Sustainability Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GLRE.L SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate UCITS ETF | 1.85% | 2.62% | 2.85% | 1.82% | 2.51% | 3.16% | 3.54% | 3.86% | 2.66% | 2.15% | 2.27% | 2.55% |
Drawdowns
IGSU.L vs. GLRE.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IGSU.L drawdown since its inception was -33.33%, smaller than the maximum GLRE.L drawdown of -43.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGSU.L and GLRE.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
IGSU.L vs. GLRE.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Dow Jones Global Sustainability Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IGSU.L) is 3.31%, while SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate UCITS ETF (GLRE.L) has a volatility of 3.49%. This indicates that IGSU.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLRE.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.