PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IGRO vs. HFQAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IGRO vs. HFQAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares International Dividend Growth ETF (IGRO) and Janus Henderson Global Equity Income Fund (HFQAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IGRO achieves a 5.91% return, which is significantly lower than HFQAX's 12.52% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IGRO having a 8.49% annualized return and HFQAX not far behind at 8.45%.


IGRO

1D
-0.85%
1M
0.87%
YTD
5.91%
6M
8.22%
1Y
13.91%
3Y*
15.21%
5Y*
7.30%
10Y*
8.49%

HFQAX

1D
0.75%
1M
3.71%
YTD
12.52%
6M
14.83%
1Y
27.08%
3Y*
18.28%
5Y*
10.37%
10Y*
8.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IGRO vs. HFQAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IGRO
iShares International Dividend Growth ETF
5.91%25.03%7.78%15.38%-12.72%9.94%7.71%26.13%-14.86%24.64%
HFQAX
Janus Henderson Global Equity Income Fund
12.52%29.61%6.86%10.17%-6.59%12.45%1.66%20.87%-15.86%19.14%

Correlation

The correlation between IGRO and HFQAX is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 20, 2016

0.78

The correlation between IGRO and HFQAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IGRO vs. HFQAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IGRO
IGRO Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
IGRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IGRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
IGRO Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
IGRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
IGRO Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

HFQAX
HFQAX Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
HFQAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HFQAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
HFQAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
HFQAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
HFQAX Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IGRO vs. HFQAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares International Dividend Growth ETF (IGRO) and Janus Henderson Global Equity Income Fund (HFQAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IGROHFQAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.44

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.40

2.67

-1.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.22

9.57

-4.35

IGRO vs. HFQAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IGRO Sharpe Ratio is 1.12, which is lower than the HFQAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IGRO and HFQAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IGROHFQAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.12

2.36

-1.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

0.80

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

0.57

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

0.33

+0.20

Drawdowns

IGRO vs. HFQAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IGRO drawdown since its inception was -36.25%, smaller than the maximum HFQAX drawdown of -52.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGRO and HFQAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IGROHFQAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.25%

-52.77%

+16.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.00%

-9.99%

-0.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.13%

-12.20%

+1.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.04%

-21.83%

-4.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.25%

-34.79%

-1.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.75%

-1.29%

-1.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.68%

-10.87%

+5.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.67%

2.78%

-0.11%

Volatility

IGRO vs. HFQAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares International Dividend Growth ETF (IGRO) is 3.60%, while Janus Henderson Global Equity Income Fund (HFQAX) has a volatility of 4.57%. This indicates that IGRO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HFQAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IGROHFQAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.60%

4.57%

-0.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.38%

9.38%

+1.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.46%

11.34%

+1.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.92%

13.04%

+0.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.86%

14.75%

+2.11%

IGRO vs. HFQAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

IGRO has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than HFQAX's 1.24% expense ratio.


Dividends

IGRO vs. HFQAX - Dividend Comparison

IGRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.41%, less than HFQAX's 5.93% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HFQAX
Janus Henderson Global Equity Income Fund
5.93%6.59%7.96%7.89%8.02%6.92%7.25%6.80%7.66%6.03%6.77%6.60%
IGRO
iShares International Dividend Growth ETF
2.41%2.51%2.44%2.79%2.69%2.27%2.41%2.65%2.97%2.43%1.18%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IGRO and HFQAX have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HFQAX has higher volatility (4.57%) compared to IGRO (3.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IGRO dropped -36.25% vs HFQAX's -52.77%.

HFQAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 1.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IGRO and HFQAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer