PortfoliosLab logo
HFQAX vs. TIBAX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between HFQAX and TIBAX is 0.76, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Performance

HFQAX vs. TIBAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Janus Henderson Global Equity Income Fund (HFQAX) and Thornburg Investment Income Builder Fund (TIBAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

HFQAX:

0.96

TIBAX:

1.47

Sortino Ratio

HFQAX:

1.37

TIBAX:

2.08

Omega Ratio

HFQAX:

1.20

TIBAX:

1.32

Calmar Ratio

HFQAX:

1.07

TIBAX:

1.92

Martin Ratio

HFQAX:

4.45

TIBAX:

7.31

Ulcer Index

HFQAX:

2.93%

TIBAX:

2.41%

Daily Std Dev

HFQAX:

12.92%

TIBAX:

11.46%

Max Drawdown

HFQAX:

-48.93%

TIBAX:

-46.73%

Current Drawdown

HFQAX:

-0.90%

TIBAX:

-0.07%

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with HFQAX having a 10.56% return and TIBAX slightly higher at 10.78%. Over the past 10 years, HFQAX has underperformed TIBAX with an annualized return of 5.01%, while TIBAX has yielded a comparatively higher 7.38% annualized return.


HFQAX

YTD

10.56%

1M

9.50%

6M

8.67%

1Y

11.44%

5Y*

11.49%

10Y*

5.01%

TIBAX

YTD

10.78%

1M

8.66%

6M

9.92%

1Y

16.15%

5Y*

15.35%

10Y*

7.38%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


HFQAX vs. TIBAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HFQAX has a 1.24% expense ratio, which is higher than TIBAX's 1.14% expense ratio.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

HFQAX vs. TIBAX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HFQAX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of HFQAX is 8383
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of HFQAX is 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of HFQAX is 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of HFQAX is 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of HFQAX is 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of HFQAX is 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

TIBAX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of TIBAX is 9090
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of TIBAX is 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of TIBAX is 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of TIBAX is 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of TIBAX is 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of TIBAX is 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

HFQAX vs. TIBAX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson Global Equity Income Fund (HFQAX) and Thornburg Investment Income Builder Fund (TIBAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current HFQAX Sharpe Ratio is 0.96, which is lower than the TIBAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HFQAX and TIBAX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

HFQAX vs. TIBAX - Dividend Comparison

HFQAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.32%, more than TIBAX's 4.16% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
HFQAX
Janus Henderson Global Equity Income Fund
7.32%7.98%7.90%8.03%6.93%7.27%6.81%7.67%6.04%6.77%6.62%6.20%
TIBAX
Thornburg Investment Income Builder Fund
4.16%4.57%4.67%5.62%5.10%4.11%4.23%4.49%4.22%3.83%4.31%5.20%

Drawdowns

HFQAX vs. TIBAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HFQAX drawdown since its inception was -48.93%, roughly equal to the maximum TIBAX drawdown of -46.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HFQAX and TIBAX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

HFQAX vs. TIBAX - Volatility Comparison

Janus Henderson Global Equity Income Fund (HFQAX) and Thornburg Investment Income Builder Fund (TIBAX) have volatilities of 3.45% and 3.45%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...