HFQAX vs. TIBAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Janus Henderson Global Equity Income Fund (HFQAX) and Thornburg Investment Income Builder Fund (TIBAX).
HFQAX is managed by Janus Henderson. It was launched on Nov 29, 2006. TIBAX is managed by Thornburg. It was launched on Dec 23, 2002.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: HFQAX or TIBAX.
Key characteristics
| HFQAX | TIBAX | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 7.32% | 11.18% |
| 1Y Return | 16.14% | 20.38% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 4.22% | 7.53% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 5.81% | 8.18% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 4.60% | 6.73% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.57 | 2.51 |
| Sortino Ratio | 2.18 | 3.51 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.28 | 1.47 |
| Calmar Ratio | 2.09 | 4.31 |
| Martin Ratio | 9.51 | 16.55 |
| Ulcer Index | 1.72% | 1.27% |
| Daily Std Dev | 10.40% | 8.37% |
| Max Drawdown | -48.93% | -46.73% |
| Current Drawdown | -4.70% | -4.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between HFQAX and TIBAX is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
HFQAX vs. TIBAX - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, HFQAX achieves a 7.32% return, which is significantly lower than TIBAX's 11.18% return. Over the past 10 years, HFQAX has underperformed TIBAX with an annualized return of 4.60%, while TIBAX has yielded a comparatively higher 6.73% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
HFQAX vs. TIBAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
HFQAX has a 1.24% expense ratio, which is higher than TIBAX's 1.14% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
HFQAX vs. TIBAX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson Global Equity Income Fund (HFQAX) and Thornburg Investment Income Builder Fund (TIBAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
HFQAX vs. TIBAX - Dividend Comparison
HFQAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.81%, more than TIBAX's 4.41% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HFQAX Janus Henderson Global Equity Income Fund | 7.81% | 7.90% | 8.03% | 6.93% | 7.27% | 6.81% | 7.67% | 6.04% | 6.77% | 6.62% | 6.20% | 5.82% |
TIBAX Thornburg Investment Income Builder Fund | 4.41% | 4.67% | 5.62% | 5.10% | 4.11% | 4.23% | 4.49% | 4.22% | 3.83% | 4.31% | 5.20% | 4.61% |
Drawdowns
HFQAX vs. TIBAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HFQAX drawdown since its inception was -48.93%, roughly equal to the maximum TIBAX drawdown of -46.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HFQAX and TIBAX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
HFQAX vs. TIBAX - Volatility Comparison
Janus Henderson Global Equity Income Fund (HFQAX) has a higher volatility of 2.60% compared to Thornburg Investment Income Builder Fund (TIBAX) at 2.06%. This indicates that HFQAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TIBAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.