IGPT vs. THNQ
IGPT (Invesco AI and Next Gen Software ETF) and THNQ (ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETF) are both Artificial Intelligence funds - IGPT tracks the STOXX World AC NexGen Software Development Index while THNQ tracks the ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IGPT returned 12.94%/yr vs 14.87%/yr for THNQ. Their correlation of 0.90 means they have usually moved in the same direction. IGPT charges 0.56%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for THNQ.
Performance
IGPT vs. THNQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IGPT achieves a 50.51% return, which is significantly higher than THNQ's 36.93% return.
IGPT
- 1D
- 3.23%
- 1M
- -6.05%
- 6M
- 36.61%
- YTD
- 50.51%
- 1Y
- 80.58%
- 3Y*
- 37.96%
- 5Y*
- 12.94%
- 10Y*
- 19.82%
- ALL TIME*
- 15.04%
THNQ
- 1D
- 2.84%
- 1M
- -1.41%
- 6M
- 34.46%
- YTD
- 36.93%
- 1Y
- 60.05%
- 3Y*
- 34.28%
- 5Y*
- 14.87%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 22.27%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $24.39M | $21.86M | $21.83M | |
| $2.07M | $1.78M | $2.51M |
IGPT vs. THNQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGPT Invesco AI and Next Gen Software ETF | 50.51% | 31.55% | 17.15% | 27.29% | -27.73% | -11.79% | 46.83% |
THNQ ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETF | 36.93% | 29.83% | 18.82% | 56.81% | -39.84% | 9.10% | 60.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between IGPT and THNQ is 0.87, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.87 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.88 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 11, 2020 | 0.90 |
The correlation between IGPT and THNQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
IGPT vs. THNQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IGPT
THNQ
Technology
Communication Services
Real Estate
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
IGPT
THNQ
Communication Services
IGPT
THNQ
Real Estate
IGPT
THNQ
Healthcare
IGPT
THNQ
Industrials
IGPT
THNQ
Consumer Cyclical
IGPT
THNQ
Financial Services
IGPT
THNQ
Basic Materials
IGPT
-
THNQ
-
Consumer Defensive
IGPT
-
THNQ
-
Energy
IGPT
-
THNQ
-
Utilities
IGPT
-
THNQ
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IGPT vs. THNQ — Risk / Return Rank
IGPT
THNQ
IGPT vs. THNQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco AI and Next Gen Software ETF (IGPT) and ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETF (THNQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IGPT | THNQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.32 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.27 | 3.28 | -0.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.33 | 9.32 | +3.01 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IGPT vs. THNQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IGPT drawdown since its inception was -50.14%, roughly equal to the maximum THNQ drawdown of -50.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGPT and THNQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IGPT | THNQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.14% | -50.56% | +0.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.74% | -18.39% | -6.35% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.30% | -29.88% | +0.58% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.04% | -50.56% | +8.52% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -50.14% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.20% | -7.04% | -10.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.95% | -14.87% | +2.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.56% | 6.46% | +0.10% |
Volatility
IGPT vs. THNQ - Volatility Comparison
Invesco AI and Next Gen Software ETF (IGPT) has a higher volatility of 14.42% compared to ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETF (THNQ) at 9.92%. This indicates that IGPT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than THNQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IGPT | THNQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.42% | 9.92% | +4.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 32.86% | 24.75% | +8.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.96% | 30.07% | +6.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.58% | 29.84% | -0.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.31% | 28.98% | -1.67% |
IGPT vs. THNQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
IGPT has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is lower than THNQ's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
IGPT vs. THNQ - Dividend Comparison
IGPT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, less than THNQ's 0.15% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGPT Invesco AI and Next Gen Software ETF | 0.01% | 0.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.41% | 6.21% | 0.04% | 0.05% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.03% | 0.15% |
THNQ ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETF | 0.15% | 0.20% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IGPT and THNQ have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IGPT has higher volatility (14.42%) compared to THNQ (9.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IGPT dropped -50.14% vs THNQ's -50.56%.
On 5-year performance, THNQ leads with 14.87% vs 12.94% for IGPT. On fees, IGPT is cheaper at 0.56% per year. On volatility, THNQ has been the lower-risk option at 9.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, THNQ has performed better with a 14.87% return vs 12.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IGPT is cheaper with a 0.56% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for THNQ.
THNQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.15%, compared with 0.01% for IGPT.
IGPT tracks STOXX World AC NexGen Software Development Index, while THNQ tracks ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Exchange Traded Concepts. Their fees differ too: 0.56% for IGPT and 0.68% for THNQ.
IGPT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.20 vs 2.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IGPT and THNQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer