PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IGPT vs. SPHQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IGPT vs. SPHQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco AI and Next Gen Software ETF (IGPT) and Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IGPT achieves a 50.51% return, which is significantly higher than SPHQ's 14.14% return. Over the past 10 years, IGPT has outperformed SPHQ with an annualized return of 19.82%, while SPHQ has yielded a comparatively lower 14.58% annualized return.


IGPT

1D
3.23%
1M
-6.05%
6M
36.61%
YTD
50.51%
1Y
80.58%
3Y*
37.96%
5Y*
12.94%
10Y*
19.82%
ALL TIME*
15.04%

SPHQ

1D
0.56%
1M
-3.11%
6M
8.93%
YTD
14.14%
1Y
21.69%
3Y*
19.92%
5Y*
12.81%
10Y*
14.58%
ALL TIME*
10.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$24.39M$21.86M$21.83M
$121.34M$134.31M$144.70M

IGPT vs. SPHQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IGPT
Invesco AI and Next Gen Software ETF
50.51%31.55%17.15%27.29%-27.73%-11.79%54.31%35.06%16.38%34.60%
SPHQ
Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF
14.14%13.25%25.44%24.83%-15.76%28.03%17.36%33.64%-7.10%19.10%

Correlation

The correlation between IGPT and SPHQ is 0.69, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.74

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.75

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 6, 2005

0.74

The correlation between IGPT and SPHQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

IGPT vs. SPHQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IGPT
SPHQ

Technology

76.6%
41.2%

Communication Services

16.9%
6.4%

Real Estate

2.4%

-

Healthcare

2.1%
3.2%

Industrials

2.0%
17.7%

Consumer Cyclical

0.1%
5.3%

Financial Services

0.1%
15.2%

Basic Materials

-

2.5%

Consumer Defensive

-

7.5%

Energy

-

1.0%

Utilities

-

4.5%

Technology

IGPT
76.6%
SPHQ
41.2%

Communication Services

IGPT
16.9%
SPHQ
6.4%

Real Estate

IGPT
2.4%
SPHQ

-

Healthcare

IGPT
2.1%
SPHQ
3.2%

Industrials

IGPT
2.0%
SPHQ
17.7%

Consumer Cyclical

IGPT
0.1%
SPHQ
5.3%

Financial Services

IGPT
0.1%
SPHQ
15.2%

Basic Materials

IGPT

-

SPHQ
2.5%

Consumer Defensive

IGPT

-

SPHQ
7.5%

Energy

IGPT

-

SPHQ
1.0%

Utilities

IGPT

-

SPHQ
4.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IGPT vs. SPHQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

IGPT
IGPT Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
IGPT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IGPT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
IGPT Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
IGPT Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
IGPT Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

SPHQ
SPHQ Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
SPHQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPHQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPHQ Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
SPHQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPHQ Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

IGPT vs. SPHQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco AI and Next Gen Software ETF (IGPT) and Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IGPTSPHQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.69

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.26

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.27

2.45

+0.83

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.33

8.64

+3.68

IGPT vs. SPHQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IGPT Sharpe Ratio is 2.20, which is higher than the SPHQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IGPT and SPHQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IGPT vs. SPHQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IGPT drawdown since its inception was -50.14%, smaller than the maximum SPHQ drawdown of -57.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGPT and SPHQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IGPTSPHQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.14%

-57.83%

+7.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.74%

-8.90%

-15.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.30%

-16.57%

-12.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.04%

-25.04%

-17.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.14%

-31.60%

-18.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.20%

-5.50%

-11.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.95%

-10.64%

-1.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.56%

2.52%

+4.04%

Volatility

IGPT vs. SPHQ - Volatility Comparison

Invesco AI and Next Gen Software ETF (IGPT) has a higher volatility of 14.42% compared to Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ) at 4.77%. This indicates that IGPT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPHQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IGPTSPHQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.42%

4.77%

+9.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

32.86%

12.37%

+20.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

36.96%

14.51%

+22.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.58%

16.74%

+12.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.31%

17.98%

+9.33%

IGPT vs. SPHQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

IGPT has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is higher than SPHQ's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

IGPT vs. SPHQ - Dividend Comparison

IGPT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, less than SPHQ's 1.10% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IGPT
Invesco AI and Next Gen Software ETF
0.01%0.04%0.00%0.00%1.41%6.21%0.04%0.05%0.00%0.00%0.03%0.15%
SPHQ
Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF
1.10%1.09%1.15%1.42%1.85%1.19%1.55%1.51%1.85%1.57%1.67%2.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


IGPT and SPHQ have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IGPT has higher volatility (14.42%) compared to SPHQ (4.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IGPT dropped -50.14% vs SPHQ's -57.83%.

On 10-year performance, IGPT leads with 19.82% vs 14.58% for SPHQ. On fees, SPHQ is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, SPHQ has been the lower-risk option at 4.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IGPT has performed better with a 19.82% return vs 14.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPHQ is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.56% for IGPT.

SPHQ has the higher dividend yield at 1.10%, compared with 0.01% for IGPT.

IGPT is categorized as Artificial Intelligence, while SPHQ is Quality Factor. IGPT tracks STOXX World AC NexGen Software Development Index, while SPHQ tracks S&P 500 Quality Index. Their fees differ too: 0.56% for IGPT and 0.15% for SPHQ.

IGPT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.20 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IGPT and SPHQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer