IGPT vs. SMH
IGPT (Invesco AI and Next Gen Software ETF) and SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IGPT is a Technology Equities fund tracking the STOXX World AC NexGen Software Development Index, while SMH is a Semiconductors fund tracking the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IGPT returned 23.18%/yr vs 38.61%/yr for SMH. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IGPT charges 0.56%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for SMH.
Performance
IGPT vs. SMH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IGPT achieves a 73.10% return, which is significantly lower than SMH's 76.85% return. Over the past 10 years, IGPT has underperformed SMH with an annualized return of 23.18%, while SMH has yielded a comparatively higher 38.61% annualized return.
IGPT
- 1D
- 3.09%
- 1M
- 5.37%
- YTD
- 73.10%
- 6M
- 72.41%
- 1Y
- 113.21%
- 3Y*
- 44.01%
- 5Y*
- 14.99%
- 10Y*
- 23.18%
SMH
- 1D
- 2.90%
- 1M
- 5.77%
- YTD
- 76.85%
- 6M
- 74.89%
- 1Y
- 132.14%
- 3Y*
- 63.82%
- 5Y*
- 38.94%
- 10Y*
- 38.61%
IGPT vs. SMH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGPT Invesco AI and Next Gen Software ETF | 73.10% | 31.55% | 17.15% | 27.29% | -27.73% | -11.79% | 54.31% | 35.06% | 16.38% | 34.60% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 76.85% | 49.17% | 39.10% | 73.38% | -33.53% | 42.13% | 55.53% | 64.45% | -9.05% | 38.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between IGPT and SMH is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2005 | 0.74 |
The correlation between IGPT and SMH shifts across timeframes, from 0.74 (all time) to 0.89 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
IGPT vs. SMH - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IGPT
SMH
Technology
Communication Services
-
Real Estate
-
Industrials
-
Healthcare
-
Financial Services
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
IGPT
SMH
Communication Services
IGPT
SMH
-
Real Estate
IGPT
SMH
-
Industrials
IGPT
SMH
-
Healthcare
IGPT
SMH
-
Financial Services
IGPT
SMH
-
Basic Materials
IGPT
-
SMH
-
Consumer Cyclical
IGPT
-
SMH
-
Consumer Defensive
IGPT
-
SMH
-
Energy
IGPT
-
SMH
-
Utilities
IGPT
-
SMH
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IGPT vs. SMH — Risk / Return Rank
IGPT
SMH
IGPT vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco AI and Next Gen Software ETF (IGPT) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IGPT | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.39 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.55 | 1.56 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.83 | 8.90 | -2.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 25.12 | 32.08 | -6.96 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IGPT vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IGPT drawdown since its inception was -50.14%, smaller than the maximum SMH drawdown of -84.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGPT and SMH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IGPT | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.14% | -84.96% | +34.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.68% | -14.93% | -1.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.30% | -35.74% | +6.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.87% | -45.30% | +0.43% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -50.14% | -45.30% | -4.84% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.78% | -4.79% | +0.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.94% | -41.00% | +29.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.52% | 4.13% | +0.39% |
Volatility
IGPT vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison
Invesco AI and Next Gen Software ETF (IGPT) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) have volatilities of 18.54% and 18.79%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IGPT | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.54% | 18.79% | -0.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 29.06% | 29.21% | -0.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.16% | 34.82% | -1.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.73% | 35.84% | -7.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.87% | 32.97% | -6.10% |
IGPT vs. SMH - Expense Ratio Comparison
IGPT has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is higher than SMH's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
IGPT vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison
IGPT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, less than SMH's 0.17% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGPT Invesco AI and Next Gen Software ETF | 0.01% | 0.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.41% | 6.21% | 0.04% | 0.05% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.03% | 0.15% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.17% | 0.31% | 0.44% | 0.60% | 1.18% | 0.51% | 0.69% | 1.50% | 1.88% | 1.43% | 0.80% | 2.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IGPT and SMH have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SMH has higher volatility (18.79%) compared to IGPT (18.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IGPT dropped -50.14% vs SMH's -84.96%.
On 10-year performance, SMH leads with 38.61% vs 23.18% for IGPT. On fees, SMH is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, IGPT has been the lower-risk option at 18.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SMH has performed better with a 38.61% return vs 23.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SMH is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.56% for IGPT.
SMH has the higher dividend yield at 0.17%, compared with 0.01% for IGPT.
IGPT is categorized as Technology Equities, while SMH is Semiconductors. IGPT tracks STOXX World AC NexGen Software Development Index, while SMH tracks MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.56% for IGPT and 0.35% for SMH.
SMH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.82 vs 3.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IGPT and SMH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer