IGM vs. RBOT
IGM (iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF) is Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P North American Expanded Technology Sector Index, while RBOT (Vicarious Surgical Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 5 years, IGM returned 19.25%/yr vs -77.06%/yr for RBOT. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
IGM vs. RBOT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IGM achieves a 22.65% return, which is significantly higher than RBOT's -91.24% return.
IGM
- 1D
- -3.56%
- 1M
- 0.74%
- YTD
- 22.65%
- 6M
- 21.02%
- 1Y
- 47.83%
- 3Y*
- 35.67%
- 5Y*
- 19.25%
- 10Y*
- 24.86%
RBOT
- 1D
- -5.00%
- 1M
- -78.87%
- YTD
- -91.24%
- 6M
- -90.50%
- 1Y
- -97.58%
- 3Y*
- -85.19%
- 5Y*
- -77.06%
- 10Y*
- —
IGM vs. RBOT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGM iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF | 22.65% | 26.76% | 36.99% | 60.68% | -35.83% | 25.72% | 9.23% |
RBOT Vicarious Surgical Inc. | -91.24% | -83.51% | 19.63% | -81.85% | -80.98% | 4.53% | 3.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between IGM and RBOT is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2020 | 0.26 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IGM vs. RBOT — Risk / Return Rank
IGM
RBOT
IGM vs. RBOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF (IGM) and Vicarious Surgical Inc. (RBOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IGM | RBOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.83 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +5.79 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 0.60 | +0.76 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.92 | -1.01 | +3.93 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.77 | -1.47 | +11.24 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IGM vs. RBOT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IGM drawdown since its inception was -65.59%, smaller than the maximum RBOT drawdown of -99.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGM and RBOT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IGM | RBOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.59% | -99.96% | +34.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.44% | -98.56% | +82.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.39% | -99.69% | +73.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.68% | -99.96% | +59.28% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.68% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.39% | -99.96% | +92.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.21% | -69.99% | +54.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.91% | 59.64% | -54.73% |
Volatility
IGM vs. RBOT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF (IGM) is 11.53%, while Vicarious Surgical Inc. (RBOT) has a volatility of 102.24%. This indicates that IGM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RBOT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IGM | RBOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.53% | 102.24% | -90.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.67% | 130.15% | -111.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.76% | 139.34% | -116.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.07% | 117.55% | -91.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.71% | 108.82% | -84.11% |
Dividends
IGM vs. RBOT - Dividend Comparison
IGM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%, while RBOT has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGM iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF | 0.14% | 0.17% | 0.22% | 0.33% | 0.66% | 0.16% | 0.32% | 0.50% | 0.57% | 0.57% | 0.90% | 0.79% |
RBOT Vicarious Surgical Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IGM and RBOT have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RBOT has higher volatility (102.24%) compared to IGM (11.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IGM dropped -65.59% vs RBOT's -99.96%.
IGM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.11 vs -0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IGM and RBOT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer