IGM vs. RBOT
IGM (iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF) is Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P North American Technology Sector Index, while RBOT (Vicarious Surgical Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 5 years, IGM returned 22.04%/yr vs -70.45%/yr for RBOT. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
IGM vs. RBOT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IGM achieves a 31.32% return, which is significantly higher than RBOT's -69.15% return.
IGM
- 1D
- -0.84%
- 1M
- 16.93%
- YTD
- 31.32%
- 6M
- 29.19%
- 1Y
- 62.26%
- 3Y*
- 39.18%
- 5Y*
- 22.04%
- 10Y*
- 25.19%
RBOT
- 1D
- -10.13%
- 1M
- -25.53%
- YTD
- -69.15%
- 6M
- -79.71%
- 1Y
- -90.69%
- 3Y*
- -78.35%
- 5Y*
- -70.45%
- 10Y*
- —
IGM vs. RBOT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGM iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF | 31.32% | 26.76% | 36.99% | 60.68% | -35.83% | 25.72% | 11.45% |
RBOT Vicarious Surgical Inc. | -69.15% | -83.51% | 19.63% | -81.85% | -80.98% | 4.53% | 4.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between IGM and RBOT is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 8, 2020 | 0.26 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IGM vs. RBOT — Risk / Return Rank
IGM
RBOT
IGM vs. RBOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF (IGM) and Vicarious Surgical Inc. (RBOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IGM | RBOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.90 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.82 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.50 | 0.72 | +0.78 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.81 | -0.50 | +4.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.36 | -0.75 | +14.11 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IGM | RBOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.07 | -0.83 | +3.90 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 | -0.45 | +1.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.03 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | -0.42 | +0.91 |
Drawdowns
IGM vs. RBOT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IGM drawdown since its inception was -65.59%, smaller than the maximum RBOT drawdown of -99.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGM and RBOT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IGM | RBOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.59% | -99.85% | +34.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.44% | -94.92% | +78.48% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.39% | -99.03% | +72.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.68% | -99.85% | +59.17% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.68% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.84% | -99.85% | +99.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.23% | -69.76% | +54.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.67% | 33.00% | -28.33% |
Volatility
IGM vs. RBOT - Volatility Comparison
iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF (IGM) has a higher volatility of 6.10% compared to Vicarious Surgical Inc. (RBOT) at 2.51%. This indicates that IGM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RBOT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IGM | RBOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.10% | 2.51% | +3.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.08% | 82.40% | -66.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.43% | 124.73% | -104.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.68% | 114.18% | -88.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.54% | 106.27% | -81.73% |
Dividends
IGM vs. RBOT - Dividend Comparison
IGM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%, while RBOT has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGM iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF | 0.12% | 0.17% | 0.22% | 0.33% | 0.66% | 0.16% | 0.32% | 0.50% | 0.57% | 0.57% | 0.90% | 0.79% |
RBOT Vicarious Surgical Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IGM and RBOT have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IGM has higher volatility (6.10%) compared to RBOT (2.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IGM dropped -65.59% vs RBOT's -99.85%.
IGM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.07 vs -0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IGM and RBOT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer