RBOT vs. XT
RBOT (Vicarious Surgical Inc.) is a stock, while XT (iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF) is Technology Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Exponential Technologies Index (Net). Over the past 5 years, RBOT returned -69.81%/yr vs 8.75%/yr for XT. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
RBOT vs. XT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RBOT achieves a -65.67% return, which is significantly lower than XT's 20.78% return.
RBOT
- 1D
- -8.02%
- 1M
- -17.13%
- YTD
- -65.67%
- 6M
- -71.35%
- 1Y
- -90.11%
- 3Y*
- -77.57%
- 5Y*
- -69.81%
- 10Y*
- —
XT
- 1D
- 0.59%
- 1M
- 9.89%
- YTD
- 20.78%
- 6M
- 22.09%
- 1Y
- 47.67%
- 3Y*
- 19.02%
- 5Y*
- 8.75%
- 10Y*
- 14.75%
RBOT vs. XT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RBOT Vicarious Surgical Inc. | -65.67% | -83.51% | 19.63% | -81.85% | -80.98% | 4.53% | 4.21% |
XT iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF | 20.78% | 26.28% | 0.29% | 27.02% | -27.83% | 16.43% | 18.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between RBOT and XT is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 8, 2020 | 0.32 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RBOT vs. XT — Risk / Return Rank
RBOT
XT
RBOT vs. XT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vicarious Surgical Inc. (RBOT) and iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF (XT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RBOT | XT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.82 | 3.00 | -3.82 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.02 | 3.95 | -4.97 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.72 | 1.50 | -0.78 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.86 | 4.65 | -5.51 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.53 | 19.56 | -21.09 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RBOT | XT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.82 | 3.00 | -3.82 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.44 | 0.42 | -0.87 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.74 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.42 | 0.66 | -1.08 |
Drawdowns
RBOT vs. XT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RBOT drawdown since its inception was -99.83%, which is greater than XT's maximum drawdown of -34.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RBOT and XT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RBOT | XT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.83% | -34.41% | -65.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -94.35% | -10.45% | -83.90% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -98.92% | -22.09% | -76.83% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -99.83% | -34.41% | -65.42% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.41% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.83% | 0.00% | -99.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -69.74% | -7.41% | -62.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 31.18% | 2.49% | +28.69% |
Volatility
RBOT vs. XT - Volatility Comparison
Vicarious Surgical Inc. (RBOT) has a higher volatility of 17.88% compared to iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF (XT) at 4.79%. This indicates that RBOT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RBOT | XT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.88% | 4.79% | +13.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 82.14% | 11.97% | +70.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 124.29% | 15.98% | +108.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 114.09% | 20.76% | +93.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 106.23% | 20.09% | +86.14% |
Dividends
RBOT vs. XT - Dividend Comparison
RBOT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.58%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RBOT Vicarious Surgical Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XT iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF | 6.58% | 7.95% | 0.66% | 0.41% | 0.78% | 0.84% | 0.77% | 1.55% | 1.40% | 0.97% | 1.37% | 1.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RBOT and XT have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RBOT has higher volatility (17.88%) compared to XT (4.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RBOT dropped -99.83% vs XT's -34.41%.
XT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.00 vs -0.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RBOT and XT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer