RBOT vs. XT
RBOT (Vicarious Surgical Inc.) is a stock, while XT (iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF) is Technology Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Exponential Technologies Index (Net). Over the past 5 years, RBOT returned -77.06%/yr vs 7.23%/yr for XT. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
RBOT vs. XT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RBOT achieves a -91.24% return, which is significantly lower than XT's 15.73% return.
RBOT
- 1D
- -5.00%
- 1M
- -78.87%
- YTD
- -91.24%
- 6M
- -90.50%
- 1Y
- -97.58%
- 3Y*
- -85.19%
- 5Y*
- -77.06%
- 10Y*
- —
XT
- 1D
- -2.84%
- 1M
- -0.34%
- YTD
- 15.73%
- 6M
- 14.43%
- 1Y
- 37.71%
- 3Y*
- 17.73%
- 5Y*
- 7.23%
- 10Y*
- 14.88%
RBOT vs. XT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RBOT Vicarious Surgical Inc. | -91.24% | -83.51% | 19.63% | -81.85% | -80.98% | 4.53% | 3.67% |
XT iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF | 15.73% | 26.28% | 0.29% | 27.02% | -27.83% | 16.43% | 18.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between RBOT and XT is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2020 | 0.32 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RBOT vs. XT — Risk / Return Rank
RBOT
XT
RBOT vs. XT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vicarious Surgical Inc. (RBOT) and iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF (XT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RBOT | XT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.90 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -6.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.60 | 1.38 | -0.78 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -1.01 | 3.63 | -4.63 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.47 | 14.43 | -15.90 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RBOT vs. XT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RBOT drawdown since its inception was -99.96%, which is greater than XT's maximum drawdown of -34.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RBOT and XT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RBOT | XT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.96% | -34.41% | -65.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -98.56% | -10.45% | -88.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -99.69% | -22.09% | -77.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -99.96% | -34.41% | -65.55% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.41% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.96% | -4.18% | -95.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -69.99% | -7.39% | -62.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 59.64% | 2.62% | +57.02% |
Volatility
RBOT vs. XT - Volatility Comparison
Vicarious Surgical Inc. (RBOT) has a higher volatility of 102.24% compared to iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF (XT) at 8.14%. This indicates that RBOT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RBOT | XT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 102.24% | 8.14% | +94.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 130.15% | 13.78% | +116.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 139.34% | 17.32% | +122.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 117.55% | 21.00% | +96.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 108.82% | 20.12% | +88.70% |
Dividends
RBOT vs. XT - Dividend Comparison
RBOT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.08%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RBOT Vicarious Surgical Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XT iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF | 7.08% | 7.95% | 0.66% | 0.41% | 0.78% | 0.84% | 0.77% | 1.55% | 1.40% | 0.97% | 1.37% | 1.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RBOT and XT have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RBOT has higher volatility (102.24%) compared to XT (8.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RBOT dropped -99.96% vs XT's -34.41%.
XT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs -0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RBOT and XT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer