RBOT vs. BOTZ
RBOT (Vicarious Surgical Inc.) is a stock, while BOTZ (Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF) is Robotics fund tracking the Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic Index. Over the past 5 years, RBOT returned -77.06%/yr vs 1.10%/yr for BOTZ. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
RBOT vs. BOTZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RBOT achieves a -91.24% return, which is significantly lower than BOTZ's 1.13% return.
RBOT
- 1D
- -5.00%
- 1M
- -78.87%
- YTD
- -91.24%
- 6M
- -90.50%
- 1Y
- -97.58%
- 3Y*
- -85.19%
- 5Y*
- -77.06%
- 10Y*
- —
BOTZ
- 1D
- -4.41%
- 1M
- -9.06%
- YTD
- 1.13%
- 6M
- 0.29%
- 1Y
- 20.00%
- 3Y*
- 9.83%
- 5Y*
- 1.10%
- 10Y*
- —
RBOT vs. BOTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RBOT Vicarious Surgical Inc. | -91.24% | -83.51% | 19.63% | -81.85% | -80.98% | 4.53% | 3.67% |
BOTZ Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF | 1.13% | 14.17% | 12.26% | 38.97% | -42.69% | 8.65% | 22.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between RBOT and BOTZ is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2020 | 0.31 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RBOT vs. BOTZ — Risk / Return Rank
RBOT
BOTZ
RBOT vs. BOTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vicarious Surgical Inc. (RBOT) and Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RBOT | BOTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.50 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.37 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.60 | 1.15 | -0.55 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -1.01 | 1.04 | -2.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.47 | 3.34 | -4.80 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RBOT vs. BOTZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RBOT drawdown since its inception was -99.96%, which is greater than BOTZ's maximum drawdown of -55.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RBOT and BOTZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RBOT | BOTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.96% | -55.54% | -44.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -98.56% | -19.34% | -79.22% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -99.69% | -29.02% | -70.67% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -99.96% | -55.54% | -44.42% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.96% | -11.99% | -87.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -69.99% | -18.27% | -51.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 59.64% | 6.01% | +53.63% |
Volatility
RBOT vs. BOTZ - Volatility Comparison
Vicarious Surgical Inc. (RBOT) has a higher volatility of 102.24% compared to Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ) at 10.19%. This indicates that RBOT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BOTZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RBOT | BOTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 102.24% | 10.19% | +92.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 130.15% | 20.13% | +110.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 139.34% | 25.54% | +113.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 117.55% | 27.03% | +90.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 108.82% | 25.83% | +82.99% |
Dividends
RBOT vs. BOTZ - Dividend Comparison
RBOT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BOTZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.65%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BOTZ Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF | 0.65% | 0.66% | 0.13% | 0.20% | 0.23% | 0.16% | 0.19% | 0.83% | 1.44% | 0.01% | 0.06% |
RBOT Vicarious Surgical Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RBOT and BOTZ have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RBOT has higher volatility (102.24%) compared to BOTZ (10.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RBOT dropped -99.96% vs BOTZ's -55.54%.
BOTZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.79 vs -0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RBOT and BOTZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer