RBOT vs. CHAT
RBOT (Vicarious Surgical Inc.) is a stock, while CHAT (Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF) is Artificial Intelligence fund actively managed by Roundhill. Over the past 3 years, RBOT returned -88.38%/yr vs 40.54%/yr for CHAT. Their 0.20 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
RBOT vs. CHAT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RBOT achieves a -96.49% return, which is significantly lower than CHAT's 39.01% return.
RBOT
- 1D
- -7.01%
- 1M
- -58.74%
- 6M
- -96.54%
- YTD
- -96.49%
- 1Y
- -99.12%
- 3Y*
- -88.38%
- 5Y*
- -80.87%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -75.32%
CHAT
- 1D
- 2.22%
- 1M
- -7.69%
- 6M
- 32.64%
- YTD
- 39.01%
- 1Y
- 68.87%
- 3Y*
- 40.54%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 45.20%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $58.63M | $57.19M | $67.40M | |
| $6.39K | $6.54K | $15.72K |
RBOT vs. CHAT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
RBOT Vicarious Surgical Inc. | -96.49% | -83.51% | 19.63% | -81.48% |
CHAT Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF | 39.01% | 49.85% | 30.98% | 21.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between RBOT and CHAT is 0.22, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.22 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2023 | 0.20 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RBOT vs. CHAT — Risk / Return Rank
RBOT
CHAT
RBOT vs. CHAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vicarious Surgical Inc. (RBOT) and Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RBOT | CHAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.31 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -6.00 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.53 | 1.27 | -0.75 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -1.01 | 2.25 | -3.26 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.39 | 7.96 | -9.35 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RBOT vs. CHAT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RBOT drawdown since its inception was -99.98%, which is greater than CHAT's maximum drawdown of -31.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RBOT and CHAT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RBOT | CHAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.98% | -31.34% | -68.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -99.26% | -28.34% | -70.92% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -99.75% | -31.34% | -68.41% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -99.98% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.98% | -21.25% | -78.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -70.56% | -5.73% | -64.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 67.73% | 8.01% | +59.72% |
Volatility
RBOT vs. CHAT - Volatility Comparison
Vicarious Surgical Inc. (RBOT) has a higher volatility of 46.55% compared to Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT) at 16.74%. This indicates that RBOT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CHAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RBOT | CHAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 46.55% | 16.74% | +29.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 136.52% | 34.39% | +102.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 146.56% | 39.18% | +107.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 120.38% | 32.41% | +87.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 110.43% | 32.41% | +78.02% |
Dividends
RBOT vs. CHAT - Dividend Comparison
RBOT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CHAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.05%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
CHAT Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF | 2.05% | 2.85% |
RBOT Vicarious Surgical Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RBOT and CHAT have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RBOT has higher volatility (46.55%) compared to CHAT (16.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RBOT dropped -99.98% vs CHAT's -31.34%.
CHAT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.63 vs -0.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RBOT and CHAT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer