RBOT vs. CHAT
RBOT (Vicarious Surgical Inc.) is a stock, while CHAT (Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF) is Technology Equities fund actively managed by Roundhill. Over the past 3 years, RBOT returned -85.19%/yr vs 51.32%/yr for CHAT. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
RBOT vs. CHAT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RBOT achieves a -91.24% return, which is significantly lower than CHAT's 63.45% return.
RBOT
- 1D
- -5.00%
- 1M
- -78.87%
- YTD
- -91.24%
- 6M
- -90.50%
- 1Y
- -97.58%
- 3Y*
- -85.19%
- 5Y*
- -77.06%
- 10Y*
- —
CHAT
- 1D
- -7.40%
- 1M
- 7.27%
- YTD
- 63.45%
- 6M
- 62.78%
- 1Y
- 115.67%
- 3Y*
- 51.32%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RBOT vs. CHAT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
RBOT Vicarious Surgical Inc. | -91.24% | -83.51% | 19.63% | -81.48% |
CHAT Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF | 63.45% | 49.85% | 30.98% | 21.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between RBOT and CHAT is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2023 | 0.21 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RBOT vs. CHAT — Risk / Return Rank
RBOT
CHAT
RBOT vs. CHAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vicarious Surgical Inc. (RBOT) and Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RBOT | CHAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -6.65 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.60 | 1.49 | -0.90 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -1.01 | 7.14 | -8.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.47 | 19.81 | -21.28 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RBOT vs. CHAT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RBOT drawdown since its inception was -99.96%, which is greater than CHAT's maximum drawdown of -31.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RBOT and CHAT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RBOT | CHAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.96% | -31.34% | -68.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -98.56% | -16.28% | -82.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -99.69% | -31.34% | -68.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -99.96% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.96% | -7.40% | -92.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -69.99% | -5.38% | -64.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 59.64% | 5.86% | +53.78% |
Volatility
RBOT vs. CHAT - Volatility Comparison
Vicarious Surgical Inc. (RBOT) has a higher volatility of 102.24% compared to Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT) at 19.25%. This indicates that RBOT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CHAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RBOT | CHAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 102.24% | 19.25% | +82.99% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 130.15% | 29.60% | +100.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 139.34% | 34.87% | +104.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 117.55% | 31.22% | +86.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 108.82% | 31.22% | +77.60% |
Dividends
RBOT vs. CHAT - Dividend Comparison
RBOT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CHAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.74%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
CHAT Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF | 1.74% | 2.85% |
RBOT Vicarious Surgical Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RBOT and CHAT have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RBOT has higher volatility (102.24%) compared to CHAT (19.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RBOT dropped -99.96% vs CHAT's -31.34%.
CHAT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.34 vs -0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RBOT and CHAT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer