RBOT vs. CHAT
RBOT (Vicarious Surgical Inc.) is a stock, while CHAT (Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF) is Technology Equities fund actively managed by Roundhill. Over the past 3 years, RBOT returned -85.83%/yr vs 44.48%/yr for CHAT. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
RBOT vs. CHAT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RBOT achieves a -92.49% return, which is significantly lower than CHAT's 48.63% return.
RBOT
- 1D
- -9.44%
- 1M
- -68.04%
- 6M
- -93.90%
- YTD
- -92.49%
- 1Y
- -97.99%
- 3Y*
- -85.83%
- 5Y*
- -77.74%
- 10Y*
- —
CHAT
- 1D
- -4.48%
- 1M
- -5.92%
- 6M
- 41.18%
- YTD
- 48.63%
- 1Y
- 87.11%
- 3Y*
- 44.48%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RBOT vs. CHAT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
RBOT Vicarious Surgical Inc. | -92.49% | -83.51% | 19.63% | -81.48% |
CHAT Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF | 48.63% | 49.85% | 30.98% | 21.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between RBOT and CHAT is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2023 | 0.20 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RBOT vs. CHAT — Risk / Return Rank
RBOT
CHAT
RBOT vs. CHAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vicarious Surgical Inc. (RBOT) and Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RBOT | CHAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -5.86 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.61 | 1.37 | -0.76 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -1.00 | 5.38 | -6.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.37 | 13.62 | -15.00 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RBOT vs. CHAT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RBOT drawdown since its inception was -99.97%, which is greater than CHAT's maximum drawdown of -31.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RBOT and CHAT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RBOT | CHAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.97% | -31.34% | -68.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -98.91% | -16.28% | -82.63% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -99.76% | -31.34% | -68.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -99.97% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.96% | -15.80% | -84.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -70.27% | -5.48% | -64.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 63.58% | 6.42% | +57.16% |
Volatility
RBOT vs. CHAT - Volatility Comparison
Vicarious Surgical Inc. (RBOT) has a higher volatility of 82.86% compared to Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT) at 18.16%. This indicates that RBOT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CHAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RBOT | CHAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 82.86% | 18.16% | +64.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 131.53% | 31.91% | +99.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 146.55% | 36.77% | +109.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 118.95% | 31.73% | +87.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 109.61% | 31.73% | +77.88% |
Dividends
RBOT vs. CHAT - Dividend Comparison
RBOT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CHAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.92%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
CHAT Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF | 1.92% | 2.85% |
RBOT Vicarious Surgical Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RBOT and CHAT have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RBOT has higher volatility (82.86%) compared to CHAT (18.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RBOT dropped -99.97% vs CHAT's -31.34%.
CHAT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs -0.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RBOT and CHAT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer