RBOT vs. CHAT
RBOT (Vicarious Surgical Inc.) is a stock, while CHAT (Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF) is Technology Equities fund actively managed by Roundhill. Over the past 3 years, RBOT returned -77.57%/yr vs 55.85%/yr for CHAT. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
RBOT vs. CHAT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RBOT achieves a -65.67% return, which is significantly lower than CHAT's 75.46% return.
RBOT
- 1D
- -8.02%
- 1M
- -17.13%
- YTD
- -65.67%
- 6M
- -71.35%
- 1Y
- -90.11%
- 3Y*
- -77.57%
- 5Y*
- -69.81%
- 10Y*
- —
CHAT
- 1D
- 1.39%
- 1M
- 30.45%
- YTD
- 75.46%
- 6M
- 75.37%
- 1Y
- 151.43%
- 3Y*
- 55.85%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RBOT vs. CHAT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
RBOT Vicarious Surgical Inc. | -65.67% | -83.51% | 19.63% | -82.02% |
CHAT Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF | 75.46% | 49.85% | 30.98% | 19.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between RBOT and CHAT is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 19, 2023 | 0.21 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RBOT vs. CHAT — Risk / Return Rank
RBOT
CHAT
RBOT vs. CHAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vicarious Surgical Inc. (RBOT) and Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RBOT | CHAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.82 | 4.96 | -5.78 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.02 | 5.02 | -6.03 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.72 | 1.68 | -0.96 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.86 | 9.50 | -10.36 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.53 | 28.10 | -29.64 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RBOT | CHAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.82 | 4.96 | -5.78 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.44 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.42 | 1.99 | -2.41 |
Drawdowns
RBOT vs. CHAT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RBOT drawdown since its inception was -99.83%, which is greater than CHAT's maximum drawdown of -31.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RBOT and CHAT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RBOT | CHAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.83% | -31.34% | -68.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -94.35% | -16.28% | -78.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -98.92% | -31.34% | -67.58% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -99.83% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.83% | 0.00% | -99.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -69.74% | -5.36% | -64.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 31.18% | 5.51% | +25.67% |
Volatility
RBOT vs. CHAT - Volatility Comparison
Vicarious Surgical Inc. (RBOT) has a higher volatility of 17.88% compared to Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT) at 11.54%. This indicates that RBOT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CHAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RBOT | CHAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.88% | 11.54% | +6.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 82.14% | 24.60% | +57.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 124.29% | 30.74% | +93.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 114.09% | 29.92% | +84.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 106.23% | 29.92% | +76.31% |
Dividends
RBOT vs. CHAT - Dividend Comparison
RBOT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CHAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.62%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
CHAT Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF | 1.62% | 2.85% |
RBOT Vicarious Surgical Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RBOT and CHAT have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RBOT has higher volatility (17.88%) compared to CHAT (11.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RBOT dropped -99.83% vs CHAT's -31.34%.
CHAT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.96 vs -0.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RBOT and CHAT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer