IGM vs. IYC
IGM (iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF) and IYC (iShares U.S. Consumer Discretionary ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IGM is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P North American Expanded Technology Sector Index, while IYC is a Consumer Discretionary Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Consumer Services Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IGM returned 23.53%/yr vs 11.11%/yr for IYC. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IGM charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for IYC.
Performance
IGM vs. IYC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IGM achieves a 19.28% return, which is significantly higher than IYC's -3.06% return. Over the past 10 years, IGM has outperformed IYC with an annualized return of 23.53%, while IYC has yielded a comparatively lower 11.11% annualized return.
IGM
- 1D
- 0.42%
- 1M
- -6.48%
- 6M
- 18.02%
- YTD
- 19.28%
- 1Y
- 34.76%
- 3Y*
- 32.52%
- 5Y*
- 17.93%
- 10Y*
- 23.53%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.42%
IYC
- 1D
- -0.67%
- 1M
- -1.61%
- 6M
- -5.68%
- YTD
- -3.06%
- 1Y
- -0.35%
- 3Y*
- 12.08%
- 5Y*
- 5.56%
- 10Y*
- 11.11%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.37%
IGM vs. IYC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGM iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF | 19.28% | 26.76% | 36.99% | 60.68% | -35.83% | 25.72% | 45.11% | 41.81% | 2.26% | 37.20% |
IYC iShares U.S. Consumer Discretionary ETF | -3.06% | 7.85% | 27.54% | 34.03% | -31.78% | 19.65% | 24.58% | 27.36% | 1.76% | 19.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between IGM and IYC is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 19, 2001 | 0.77 |
Over the past year, the correlation between IGM and IYC has dropped to 0.47 - well below their long-term average of 0.77, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
IGM vs. IYC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IGM
IYC
Technology
Communication Services
Industrials
Financial Services
-
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
IGM
IYC
Communication Services
IGM
IYC
Industrials
IGM
IYC
Financial Services
IGM
IYC
-
Energy
IGM
IYC
Consumer Cyclical
IGM
IYC
Basic Materials
IGM
IYC
-
Consumer Defensive
IGM
-
IYC
Healthcare
IGM
-
IYC
-
Real Estate
IGM
-
IYC
-
Utilities
IGM
-
IYC
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IGM vs. IYC — Risk / Return Rank
IGM
IYC
IGM vs. IYC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF (IGM) and iShares U.S. Consumer Discretionary ETF (IYC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IGM | IYC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.50 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.91 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.01 | +0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.12 | -0.03 | +2.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.57 | -0.08 | +6.65 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IGM vs. IYC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IGM drawdown since its inception was -65.59%, which is greater than IYC's maximum drawdown of -53.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGM and IYC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IGM | IYC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.59% | -53.10% | -12.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.44% | -11.97% | -4.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.39% | -21.62% | -4.77% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.68% | -35.90% | -4.78% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.68% | -35.90% | -4.78% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.93% | -6.72% | -3.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.19% | -9.93% | -5.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.30% | 4.43% | +0.87% |
Volatility
IGM vs. IYC - Volatility Comparison
iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF (IGM) has a higher volatility of 8.68% compared to iShares U.S. Consumer Discretionary ETF (IYC) at 4.46%. This indicates that IGM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IYC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IGM | IYC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.68% | 4.46% | +4.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.74% | 11.45% | +8.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.66% | 14.81% | +8.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.23% | 20.82% | +5.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.77% | 19.91% | +4.86% |
IGM vs. IYC - Expense Ratio Comparison
IGM has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than IYC's 0.38% expense ratio.
Dividends
IGM vs. IYC - Dividend Comparison
IGM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%, less than IYC's 0.51% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGM iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF | 0.14% | 0.17% | 0.22% | 0.33% | 0.66% | 0.16% | 0.32% | 0.50% | 0.57% | 0.57% | 0.90% | 0.79% |
IYC iShares U.S. Consumer Discretionary ETF | 0.51% | 0.51% | 0.47% | 0.68% | 0.68% | 0.39% | 0.65% | 0.89% | 0.90% | 0.92% | 1.10% | 1.03% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IGM and IYC have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IGM has higher volatility (8.68%) compared to IYC (4.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IGM dropped -65.59% vs IYC's -53.10%.
On 10-year performance, IGM leads with 23.53% vs 11.11% for IYC. On fees, IYC is cheaper at 0.38% per year. On volatility, IYC has been the lower-risk option at 4.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IGM has performed better with a 23.53% return vs 11.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IYC is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for IGM.
IYC has the higher dividend yield at 0.51%, compared with 0.14% for IGM.
IGM is categorized as Technology Equities, while IYC is Consumer Discretionary Equities. IGM tracks S&P North American Expanded Technology Sector Index, while IYC tracks Dow Jones U.S. Consumer Services Index. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for IGM and 0.38% for IYC.
IGM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.48 vs -0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IGM and IYC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer