IGM vs. ESPO
IGM (iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF) and ESPO (VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IGM is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P North American Expanded Technology Sector Index, while ESPO is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the MVIS Global Video Gaming and eSports Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IGM returned 20.09%/yr vs 5.49%/yr for ESPO. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IGM charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for ESPO.
Performance
IGM vs. ESPO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IGM achieves a 23.42% return, which is significantly higher than ESPO's -15.10% return.
IGM
- 1D
- 0.69%
- 1M
- 3.04%
- YTD
- 23.42%
- 6M
- 23.24%
- 1Y
- 48.57%
- 3Y*
- 35.37%
- 5Y*
- 20.09%
- 10Y*
- 24.57%
ESPO
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- -3.31%
- YTD
- -15.10%
- 6M
- -16.17%
- 1Y
- -14.92%
- 3Y*
- 16.96%
- 5Y*
- 5.49%
- 10Y*
- —
IGM vs. ESPO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGM iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF | 23.42% | 26.76% | 36.99% | 60.68% | -35.83% | 25.72% | 45.11% | 41.81% | -12.91% |
ESPO VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports ETF | -15.10% | 25.79% | 47.61% | 33.64% | -34.71% | -2.13% | 83.93% | 42.36% | -12.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between IGM and ESPO is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2018 | 0.76 |
The correlation between IGM and ESPO shifts across timeframes, from 0.62 (1 year) to 0.76 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
IGM vs. ESPO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IGM
ESPO
Technology
Communication Services
Financial Services
-
Industrials
-
Energy
-
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
IGM
ESPO
Communication Services
IGM
ESPO
Financial Services
IGM
ESPO
-
Industrials
IGM
ESPO
-
Energy
IGM
ESPO
-
Consumer Cyclical
IGM
ESPO
Basic Materials
IGM
-
ESPO
-
Consumer Defensive
IGM
-
ESPO
-
Healthcare
IGM
-
ESPO
-
Real Estate
IGM
-
ESPO
-
Utilities
IGM
-
ESPO
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IGM vs. ESPO — Risk / Return Rank
IGM
ESPO
IGM vs. ESPO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF (IGM) and VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports ETF (ESPO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IGM | ESPO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.80 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 0.88 | +0.49 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.97 | -0.54 | +3.51 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.06 | -0.94 | +11.00 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IGM vs. ESPO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IGM drawdown since its inception was -65.59%, which is greater than ESPO's maximum drawdown of -50.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGM and ESPO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IGM | ESPO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.59% | -50.99% | -14.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.44% | -27.81% | +11.37% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.39% | -27.81% | +1.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.68% | -48.33% | +7.65% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.68% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.80% | -27.19% | +20.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.22% | -15.06% | -0.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.84% | 15.95% | -11.11% |
Volatility
IGM vs. ESPO - Volatility Comparison
iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF (IGM) has a higher volatility of 10.03% compared to VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports ETF (ESPO) at 4.42%. This indicates that IGM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ESPO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IGM | ESPO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.03% | 4.42% | +5.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.11% | 14.67% | +3.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.98% | 18.83% | +3.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.91% | 25.10% | +0.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.66% | 25.71% | -1.05% |
IGM vs. ESPO - Expense Ratio Comparison
IGM has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than ESPO's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
IGM vs. ESPO - Dividend Comparison
IGM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%, less than ESPO's 1.47% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESPO VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports ETF | 1.47% | 1.24% | 0.44% | 0.96% | 0.91% | 3.36% | 0.12% | 0.22% | 0.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IGM iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF | 0.13% | 0.17% | 0.22% | 0.33% | 0.66% | 0.16% | 0.32% | 0.50% | 0.57% | 0.57% | 0.90% | 0.79% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IGM and ESPO have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IGM has higher volatility (10.03%) compared to ESPO (4.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IGM dropped -65.59% vs ESPO's -50.99%.
On 5-year performance, IGM leads with 20.09% vs 5.49% for ESPO. On fees, IGM is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, ESPO has been the lower-risk option at 4.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, IGM has performed better with a 20.09% return vs 5.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IGM is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for ESPO.
ESPO has the higher dividend yield at 1.47%, compared with 0.13% for IGM.
IGM is categorized as Technology Equities, while ESPO is Large Cap Growth Equities. IGM tracks S&P North American Expanded Technology Sector Index, while ESPO tracks MVIS Global Video Gaming and eSports Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for IGM and 0.55% for ESPO.
IGM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.22 vs -0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IGM and ESPO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer