PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IGLN.L vs. IAU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IGLN.L vs. IAU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Physical Gold ETC (IGLN.L) and iShares Gold Trust (IAU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with IGLN.L having a 3.00% return and IAU slightly lower at 2.98%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IGLN.L having a 13.40% annualized return and IAU not far behind at 13.31%.


IGLN.L

1D
-1.45%
1M
-4.23%
YTD
3.00%
6M
5.09%
1Y
32.44%
3Y*
31.11%
5Y*
18.45%
10Y*
13.40%

IAU

1D
-0.98%
1M
-1.62%
YTD
2.98%
6M
5.50%
1Y
32.20%
3Y*
31.29%
5Y*
18.32%
10Y*
13.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IGLN.L vs. IAU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IGLN.L
iShares Physical Gold ETC
3.00%64.92%26.14%13.44%-0.09%-4.03%24.16%18.28%-1.31%11.67%
IAU
iShares Gold Trust
2.98%63.95%26.85%12.84%-0.63%-4.00%25.03%17.98%-1.76%12.91%

Correlation

The correlation between IGLN.L and IAU is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 13, 2011

0.76

The correlation between IGLN.L and IAU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IGLN.L vs. IAU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IGLN.L
IGLN.L Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
IGLN.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IGLN.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
IGLN.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
IGLN.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
IGLN.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

IAU
IAU Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
IAU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IAU Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
IAU Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
IAU Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
IAU Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IGLN.L vs. IAU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Physical Gold ETC (IGLN.L) and iShares Gold Trust (IAU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IGLN.LIAUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.24

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.86

1.69

+0.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.85

4.19

+0.67

IGLN.L vs. IAU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IGLN.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.30, which is comparable to the IAU Sharpe Ratio of 1.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IGLN.L and IAU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IGLN.LIAUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.30

1.23

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.06

1.03

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

0.84

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.62

-0.17

Drawdowns

IGLN.L vs. IAU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IGLN.L drawdown since its inception was -45.24%, roughly equal to the maximum IAU drawdown of -45.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGLN.L and IAU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IGLN.LIAUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.24%

-45.14%

-0.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.36%

-19.18%

+1.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.36%

-19.18%

+1.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.15%

-20.93%

-0.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.15%

-21.82%

+0.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.23%

-17.70%

+1.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.80%

-15.96%

-3.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.66%

7.71%

-1.05%

Volatility

IGLN.L vs. IAU - Volatility Comparison

iShares Physical Gold ETC (IGLN.L) has a higher volatility of 6.40% compared to iShares Gold Trust (IAU) at 5.50%. This indicates that IGLN.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IAU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IGLN.LIAUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.40%

5.50%

+0.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.73%

23.02%

-1.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.79%

26.42%

-1.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.37%

17.95%

-0.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.54%

15.90%

-0.36%

IGLN.L vs. IAU - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both IGLN.L and IAU have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IGLN.L vs. IAU - Dividend Comparison

Neither IGLN.L nor IAU has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


IGLN.L and IAU have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.25% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IGLN.L and IAU have the same expense ratio: 0.25% per year.

Both ETFs track LBMA Gold Price.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IGLN.L and IAU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer