IGLN.L vs. ACWV
IGLN.L (iShares Physical Gold ETC) and ACWV (iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IGLN.L is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price, while ACWV is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI Minimum Volatility Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IGLN.L returned 12.45%/yr vs 7.48%/yr for ACWV. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IGLN.L charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for ACWV.
Performance
IGLN.L vs. ACWV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IGLN.L achieves a -2.16% return, which is significantly lower than ACWV's 2.88% return. Over the past 10 years, IGLN.L has outperformed ACWV with an annualized return of 12.45%, while ACWV has yielded a comparatively lower 7.48% annualized return.
IGLN.L
- 1D
- 3.37%
- 1M
- -10.03%
- YTD
- -2.16%
- 6M
- -1.54%
- 1Y
- 23.07%
- 3Y*
- 29.33%
- 5Y*
- 17.43%
- 10Y*
- 12.45%
ACWV
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- 0.59%
- YTD
- 2.88%
- 6M
- 2.95%
- 1Y
- 5.56%
- 3Y*
- 9.98%
- 5Y*
- 5.46%
- 10Y*
- 7.48%
IGLN.L vs. ACWV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGLN.L iShares Physical Gold ETC | -2.16% | 64.93% | 26.14% | 13.44% | -0.09% | -4.03% | 24.16% | 18.30% | -1.33% | 11.69% |
ACWV iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF | 2.88% | 11.04% | 11.38% | 8.23% | -10.36% | 13.97% | 3.04% | 21.04% | -1.42% | 18.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between IGLN.L and ACWV is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2011 | 0.11 |
The correlation between IGLN.L and ACWV shifts across timeframes, from 0.11 (all time) to 0.22 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IGLN.L vs. ACWV — Risk / Return Rank
IGLN.L
ACWV
IGLN.L vs. ACWV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Physical Gold ETC (IGLN.L) and iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF (ACWV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IGLN.L | ACWV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.33 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.11 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.05 | 0.76 | +0.29 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.27 | 2.31 | +0.96 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IGLN.L vs. ACWV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IGLN.L drawdown since its inception was -45.25%, which is greater than ACWV's maximum drawdown of -28.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGLN.L and ACWV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IGLN.L | ACWV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.25% | -28.82% | -16.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.02% | -6.37% | -16.65% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.02% | -7.56% | -15.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.02% | -18.14% | -4.88% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -23.02% | -28.82% | +5.80% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.43% | -2.42% | -18.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.72% | -3.11% | -16.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.41% | 2.10% | +5.31% |
Volatility
IGLN.L vs. ACWV - Volatility Comparison
iShares Physical Gold ETC (IGLN.L) has a higher volatility of 7.69% compared to iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF (ACWV) at 2.18%. This indicates that IGLN.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ACWV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IGLN.L | ACWV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.69% | 2.18% | +5.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.45% | 5.63% | +16.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.45% | 7.80% | +17.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.55% | 10.23% | +7.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.63% | 12.30% | +3.33% |
IGLN.L vs. ACWV - Expense Ratio Comparison
IGLN.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than ACWV's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IGLN.L vs. ACWV - Dividend Comparison
IGLN.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ACWV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.03%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACWV iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF | 2.03% | 2.09% | 2.33% | 2.41% | 2.18% | 1.92% | 1.77% | 2.54% | 2.32% | 2.04% | 2.56% | 2.28% |
IGLN.L iShares Physical Gold ETC | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IGLN.L and ACWV have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IGLN.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IGLN.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for ACWV.
IGLN.L is categorized as Gold, while ACWV is Large Cap Blend Equities. IGLN.L tracks LBMA Gold Price, while ACWV tracks MSCI ACWI Minimum Volatility Index. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for IGLN.L and 0.20% for ACWV.
Find the right allocation for IGLN.L and ACWV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer