IGLGX vs. CTCAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Columbia Select Global Equity Fund (IGLGX) and Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund Class A (CTCAX).
IGLGX is managed by Columbia. It was launched on May 28, 1990. CTCAX is managed by Columbia. It was launched on Nov 9, 2000.
Performance
IGLGX vs. CTCAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
IGLGX vs. CTCAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGLGX Columbia Select Global Equity Fund | -2.71% | 17.39% | 17.49% | 24.47% | -28.14% | 23.11% | 26.62% | 34.96% | -1.70% | 32.23% |
CTCAX Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund Class A | -6.10% | 24.78% | 31.39% | 56.46% | -34.81% | 22.73% | 49.46% | 43.91% | -1.48% | 42.99% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IGLGX achieves a -2.71% return, which is significantly higher than CTCAX's -6.10% return. Over the past 10 years, IGLGX has underperformed CTCAX with an annualized return of 12.41%, while CTCAX has yielded a comparatively higher 20.80% annualized return.
IGLGX
- 1D
- 3.69%
- 1M
- -7.18%
- YTD
- -2.71%
- 6M
- -0.85%
- 1Y
- 16.73%
- 3Y*
- 15.29%
- 5Y*
- 7.26%
- 10Y*
- 12.41%
CTCAX
- 1D
- 4.59%
- 1M
- -5.90%
- YTD
- -6.10%
- 6M
- -5.08%
- 1Y
- 32.32%
- 3Y*
- 25.70%
- 5Y*
- 12.94%
- 10Y*
- 20.80%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IGLGX vs. CTCAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
IGLGX has a 1.25% expense ratio, which is higher than CTCAX's 1.18% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
IGLGX vs. CTCAX — Risk / Return Rank
IGLGX
CTCAX
IGLGX vs. CTCAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Select Global Equity Fund (IGLGX) and Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund Class A (CTCAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IGLGX | CTCAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.87 | 1.24 | -0.37 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.32 | 1.84 | -0.52 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.26 | -0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.32 | 2.30 | -0.98 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.32 | 8.07 | -2.75 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IGLGX | CTCAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 | 1.24 | -0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 | 0.50 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.67 | 0.84 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.71 | -0.31 |
Correlation
The correlation between IGLGX and CTCAX is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
IGLGX vs. CTCAX - Dividend Comparison
IGLGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.52%, more than CTCAX's 3.50% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGLGX Columbia Select Global Equity Fund | 9.52% | 9.26% | 6.61% | 4.42% | 0.00% | 9.10% | 8.52% | 2.98% | 11.20% | 0.42% | 0.00% | 0.01% |
CTCAX Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund Class A | 3.50% | 3.29% | 1.08% | 2.36% | 3.53% | 4.15% | 0.91% | 2.55% | 5.82% | 3.52% | 0.36% | 1.80% |
Drawdowns
IGLGX vs. CTCAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IGLGX drawdown since its inception was -60.11%, roughly equal to the maximum CTCAX drawdown of -61.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGLGX and CTCAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| IGLGX | CTCAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.11% | -61.04% | +0.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.75% | -14.43% | +1.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.73% | -39.55% | +3.82% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.73% | -39.55% | +3.82% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.52% | -10.51% | +0.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.69% | -10.75% | -3.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.17% | 4.12% | -0.95% |
Volatility
IGLGX vs. CTCAX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Columbia Select Global Equity Fund (IGLGX) is 8.28%, while Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund Class A (CTCAX) has a volatility of 8.94%. This indicates that IGLGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CTCAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| IGLGX | CTCAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.28% | 8.94% | -0.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.29% | 16.85% | -3.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.76% | 27.31% | -7.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.51% | 25.88% | -7.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.51% | 24.70% | -6.19% |