IGLD vs. BTCI

Last updated Jun 21, 2026

IGLD (FT Vest Gold Strategy Target Income ETF) and BTCI (NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IGLD is a Gold fund actively managed by First Trust, while BTCI is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Neos. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, IGLD returned 18.24% vs -34.62% for BTCI. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IGLD charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for BTCI.

Performance

IGLD vs. BTCI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest Gold Strategy Target Income ETF (IGLD) and NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF (BTCI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IGLD achieves a -3.05% return, which is significantly higher than BTCI's -25.54% return.

IGLD

• 1D: -0.50%
• 1M: -5.65%
• YTD: -3.05%
• 6M: -3.19%
• 1Y: 18.24%
• 3Y*: 20.70%
• 5Y*: 13.37%
• 10Y*: —

BTCI

• 1D: -2.32%
• 1M: -16.42%
• YTD: -25.54%
• 6M: -25.93%
• 1Y: -34.62%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IGLD vs. BTCI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
IGLD FT Vest Gold Strategy Target Income ETF	-3.05%	47.46%	-1.33%
BTCI NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF	-25.54%	-1.09%	26.12%

Correlation

The correlation between IGLD and BTCI is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.20
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2024	0.12

Return for Risk

IGLD vs. BTCI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IGLD

IGLD Risk / Return Rank: 21
IGLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
IGLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 21
IGLD Omega Ratio Rank: 24
IGLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 19
IGLD Martin Ratio Rank: 21

BTCI

BTCI Risk / Return Rank: 2
BTCI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
BTCI Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
BTCI Omega Ratio Rank: 3
BTCI Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
BTCI Martin Ratio Rank: 2

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IGLD vs. BTCI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest Gold Strategy Target Income ETF (IGLD) and NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF (BTCI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IGLD	BTCI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.76	-0.89	+1.64
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.12	-1.19	+2.31
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	0.86	+0.30
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.84	-0.74	+1.58
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.47	-1.31	+3.77

IGLD vs. BTCI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IGLD Sharpe Ratio is 0.76, which is higher than the BTCI Sharpe Ratio of -0.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IGLD and BTCI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

IGLD vs. BTCI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IGLD drawdown since its inception was -21.90%, smaller than the maximum BTCI drawdown of -47.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGLD and BTCI.

Drawdown Indicators

	IGLD	BTCI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.90%	-47.16%	+25.26%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-21.90%	-47.16%	+25.26%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.90%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.90%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-19.11%	-44.94%	+25.83%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.34%	-15.92%	+10.58%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.46%	26.71%	-19.25%

Volatility

IGLD vs. BTCI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Vest Gold Strategy Target Income ETF (IGLD) is 8.12%, while NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF (BTCI) has a volatility of 12.11%. This indicates that IGLD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BTCI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IGLD	BTCI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.12%	12.11%	-3.99%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	22.26%	31.18%	-8.92%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.31%	39.53%	-15.22%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.45%	40.31%	-24.86%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.28%	40.31%	-25.03%

IGLD vs. BTCI - Expense Ratio Comparison

IGLD has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than BTCI's 0.99% expense ratio.

Dividends

IGLD vs. BTCI - Dividend Comparison

IGLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 18.79%, less than BTCI's 48.02% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
BTCI NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF	48.02%	36.46%	6.76%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
IGLD FT Vest Gold Strategy Target Income ETF	18.79%	9.91%	20.81%	7.85%	4.45%	2.24%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IGLD and BTCI in my portfolio?

IGLD and BTCI have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IGLD or BTCI?

BTCI has higher volatility (12.11%) compared to IGLD (8.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IGLD dropped -21.90% vs BTCI's -47.16%.

Which ETF is better, IGLD or BTCI?

On 1-year performance, IGLD leads with 18.24% vs -34.62% for BTCI. On fees, IGLD is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, IGLD has been the lower-risk option at 8.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IGLD or BTCI?

Over the 1-year period, IGLD has performed better with a 18.24% return vs -34.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IGLD or BTCI?

IGLD is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for BTCI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IGLD or BTCI?

BTCI has the higher dividend yield at 48.02%, compared with 18.79% for IGLD.

What is the main difference between IGLD and BTCI?

IGLD is categorized as Gold, while BTCI is Cryptocurrency. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Neos. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for IGLD and 0.99% for BTCI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IGLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.76 vs -0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.