IGHG vs. PCL
IGHG (ProShares Investment Grade-Interest Rate Hedged) and PCL (PGIM Corporate Bond 10+ Year ETF) are both Corporate Bonds funds. IGHG is passively managed, while PCL is actively managed. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IGHG charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for PCL.
Performance
IGHG vs. PCL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with IGHG having a 2.12% return and PCL slightly lower at 2.06%.
IGHG
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.02%
- YTD
- 2.12%
- 6M
- 1.98%
- 1Y
- 5.86%
- 3Y*
- 8.33%
- 5Y*
- 5.15%
- 10Y*
- 4.84%
PCL
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- 1.57%
- YTD
- 2.06%
- 6M
- 1.90%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IGHG vs. PCL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
IGHG ProShares Investment Grade-Interest Rate Hedged | 2.12% | 2.38% |
PCL PGIM Corporate Bond 10+ Year ETF | 2.06% | 2.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between IGHG and PCL is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2025 | 0.21 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IGHG vs. PCL — Risk / Return Rank
IGHG
PCL
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
IGHG vs. PCL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Investment Grade-Interest Rate Hedged (IGHG) and PGIM Corporate Bond 10+ Year ETF (PCL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IGHG | PCL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.36 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.87 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IGHG vs. PCL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IGHG drawdown since its inception was -25.16%, which is greater than PCL's maximum drawdown of -5.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGHG and PCL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IGHG | PCL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.16% | -5.14% | -20.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.75% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.74% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -8.75% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.16% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.21% | -0.91% | +0.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.29% | -1.73% | -0.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.50% | — | — |
Volatility
IGHG vs. PCL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IGHG | PCL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.58% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.46% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.40% | 7.83% | -4.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.02% | 7.83% | -2.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.45% | 7.83% | -0.38% |
IGHG vs. PCL - Expense Ratio Comparison
IGHG has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than PCL's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
IGHG vs. PCL - Dividend Comparison
IGHG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.12%, less than PCL's 5.27% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGHG ProShares Investment Grade-Interest Rate Hedged | 5.12% | 5.14% | 5.06% | 4.99% | 3.55% | 2.50% | 2.79% | 3.48% | 4.13% | 3.36% | 3.37% | 3.65% |
PCL PGIM Corporate Bond 10+ Year ETF | 5.27% | 2.52% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IGHG and PCL have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PCL is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PCL is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for IGHG.
PCL has the higher dividend yield at 5.27%, compared with 5.12% for IGHG.
They also come from different issuers: ProShares and PGIM. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for IGHG and 0.25% for PCL.
Find the right allocation for IGHG and PCL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer