PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IGHG vs. BSCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IGHG vs. BSCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Investment Grade-Interest Rate Hedged (IGHG) and Invesco BulletShares 2033 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IGHG achieves a 2.17% return, which is significantly higher than BSCX's 0.17% return.


IGHG

1D
0.05%
1M
0.76%
YTD
2.17%
6M
2.54%
1Y
5.77%
3Y*
8.57%
5Y*
5.24%
10Y*
4.72%

BSCX

1D
-0.19%
1M
0.27%
YTD
0.17%
6M
0.21%
1Y
6.09%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IGHG vs. BSCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
IGHG
ProShares Investment Grade-Interest Rate Hedged
2.17%5.65%9.20%3.77%
BSCX
Invesco BulletShares 2033 Corporate Bond ETF
0.17%9.31%1.73%7.88%

Correlation

The correlation between IGHG and BSCX is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 21, 2023

0.01

The correlation between IGHG and BSCX shifts across timeframes, from 0.01 (all time) to 0.13 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IGHG vs. BSCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IGHG
IGHG Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
IGHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IGHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
IGHG Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
IGHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
IGHG Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

BSCX
BSCX Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
BSCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BSCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
BSCX Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
BSCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
BSCX Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IGHG vs. BSCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Investment Grade-Interest Rate Hedged (IGHG) and Invesco BulletShares 2033 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IGHGBSCXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.26

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.31

2.11

+1.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.71

6.83

+4.88

IGHG vs. BSCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IGHG Sharpe Ratio is 1.68, which is comparable to the BSCX Sharpe Ratio of 1.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IGHG and BSCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IGHGBSCXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.68

1.49

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

1.16

-0.63

Drawdowns

IGHG vs. BSCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IGHG drawdown since its inception was -25.16%, which is greater than BSCX's maximum drawdown of -5.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGHG and BSCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IGHGBSCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.16%

-5.13%

-20.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.75%

-2.90%

+1.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-8.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.11%

-1.40%

+1.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.30%

-1.37%

-0.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.50%

0.89%

-0.39%

Volatility

IGHG vs. BSCX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares Investment Grade-Interest Rate Hedged (IGHG) is 0.62%, while Invesco BulletShares 2033 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCX) has a volatility of 1.32%. This indicates that IGHG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BSCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IGHGBSCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.62%

1.32%

-0.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.53%

2.97%

-0.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.44%

4.11%

-0.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.02%

6.08%

-1.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.46%

6.08%

+1.38%

IGHG vs. BSCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

IGHG has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than BSCX's 0.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

IGHG vs. BSCX - Dividend Comparison

IGHG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.11%, more than BSCX's 4.89% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BSCX
Invesco BulletShares 2033 Corporate Bond ETF
4.89%4.82%5.00%1.08%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IGHG
ProShares Investment Grade-Interest Rate Hedged
5.11%5.14%5.06%4.99%3.55%2.50%2.79%3.48%4.13%3.36%3.37%3.65%

Frequently Asked Questions


IGHG and BSCX have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BSCX has higher volatility (1.32%) compared to IGHG (0.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IGHG dropped -25.16% vs BSCX's -5.13%.

On 1-year performance, BSCX leads with 6.09% vs 5.77% for IGHG. On fees, BSCX is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, IGHG has been the lower-risk option at 0.62%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, BSCX has performed better with a 6.09% return vs 5.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BSCX is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for IGHG.

IGHG has the higher dividend yield at 5.11%, compared with 4.89% for BSCX.

IGHG tracks Citi Corporate Investment Grade (Treasury Rate-Hedged) Index, while BSCX tracks Invesco BulletShares USD Corporate Bond 2033 Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for IGHG and 0.10% for BSCX.

IGHG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.68 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IGHG and BSCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer