PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IGHG vs. BSCR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IGHG vs. BSCR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Investment Grade-Interest Rate Hedged (IGHG) and Invesco BulletShares 2027 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IGHG achieves a 1.95% return, which is significantly higher than BSCR's 1.63% return.


IGHG

1D
0.07%
1M
-0.38%
6M
1.62%
YTD
1.95%
1Y
4.71%
3Y*
7.85%
5Y*
5.33%
10Y*
4.69%

BSCR

1D
0.05%
1M
0.30%
6M
1.57%
YTD
1.63%
1Y
4.33%
3Y*
5.31%
5Y*
1.36%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IGHG vs. BSCR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IGHG
ProShares Investment Grade-Interest Rate Hedged
1.95%5.65%9.20%11.58%-0.90%0.88%0.61%12.73%-3.96%1.90%
BSCR
Invesco BulletShares 2027 Corporate Bond ETF
1.63%5.77%4.52%6.41%-9.56%-1.72%9.68%14.88%-2.63%0.81%

Correlation

The correlation between IGHG and BSCR is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.01

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2017

0.04

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IGHG vs. BSCR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IGHG
IGHG Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
IGHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IGHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
IGHG Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
IGHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
IGHG Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

BSCR
BSCR Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
BSCR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BSCR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
BSCR Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
BSCR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
BSCR Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IGHG vs. BSCR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Investment Grade-Interest Rate Hedged (IGHG) and Invesco BulletShares 2027 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IGHGBSCRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.89

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-5.98

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

2.16

-0.91

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.70

10.40

-7.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.50

45.96

-36.46

IGHG vs. BSCR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IGHG Sharpe Ratio is 1.41, which is lower than the BSCR Sharpe Ratio of 4.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IGHG and BSCR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IGHG vs. BSCR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IGHG drawdown since its inception was -25.16%, which is greater than BSCR's maximum drawdown of -17.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGHG and BSCR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IGHGBSCRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.16%

-17.26%

-7.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.75%

-0.42%

-1.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.74%

-2.27%

-1.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-8.75%

-14.87%

+6.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.42%

0.00%

-0.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.28%

-3.30%

+1.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.50%

0.09%

+0.41%

Volatility

IGHG vs. BSCR - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Investment Grade-Interest Rate Hedged (IGHG) has a higher volatility of 0.62% compared to Invesco BulletShares 2027 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCR) at 0.20%. This indicates that IGHG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BSCR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IGHGBSCRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.62%

0.20%

+0.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.11%

0.60%

+1.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.35%

1.01%

+2.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.01%

4.07%

+0.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.32%

5.32%

+2.00%

IGHG vs. BSCR - Expense Ratio Comparison

IGHG has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than BSCR's 0.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

IGHG vs. BSCR - Dividend Comparison

IGHG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.13%, more than BSCR's 4.28% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BSCR
Invesco BulletShares 2027 Corporate Bond ETF
4.28%4.26%4.27%3.74%2.65%2.12%2.46%3.11%3.35%0.78%0.00%0.00%
IGHG
ProShares Investment Grade-Interest Rate Hedged
5.13%5.14%5.06%4.99%3.55%2.50%2.79%3.48%4.13%3.36%3.37%3.65%

Frequently Asked Questions


IGHG and BSCR have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IGHG has higher volatility (0.62%) compared to BSCR (0.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IGHG dropped -25.16% vs BSCR's -17.26%.

On 5-year performance, IGHG leads with 5.33% vs 1.36% for BSCR. On fees, BSCR is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, BSCR has been the lower-risk option at 0.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, IGHG has performed better with a 5.33% return vs 1.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BSCR is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for IGHG.

IGHG has the higher dividend yield at 5.13%, compared with 4.28% for BSCR.

IGHG tracks Citi Corporate Investment Grade (Treasury Rate-Hedged) Index, while BSCR tracks NASDAQ Bulletshares® USD Corporate Bond 2027 Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for IGHG and 0.10% for BSCR.

BSCR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.31 vs 1.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IGHG and BSCR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer