IGGY vs. PATN

Last updated Jun 27, 2026

IGGY (AB International Growth ETF) and PATN (Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. IGGY is actively managed, while PATN is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IGGY charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for PATN.

Performance

IGGY vs. PATN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AB International Growth ETF (IGGY) and Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF (PATN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IGGY achieves a -2.55% return, which is significantly lower than PATN's 35.06% return.

IGGY

• 1D: -0.41%
• 1M: -0.36%
• YTD: -2.55%
• 6M: -3.36%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PATN

• 1D: -1.44%
• 1M: 0.03%
• YTD: 35.06%
• 6M: 34.62%
• 1Y: 60.70%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IGGY vs. PATN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
IGGY AB International Growth ETF	-2.55%	-3.42%
PATN Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF	35.06%	7.73%

Correlation

The correlation between IGGY and PATN is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 17, 2025	0.84

Return for Risk

IGGY vs. PATN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IGGY

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

PATN

PATN Risk / Return Rank: 87
PATN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
PATN Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
PATN Omega Ratio Rank: 87
PATN Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
PATN Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IGGY vs. PATN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB International Growth ETF (IGGY) and Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF (PATN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IGGY	PATN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	2.55	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	3.17	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.46	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	4.24	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	16.34	—

Drawdowns

IGGY vs. PATN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IGGY drawdown since its inception was -19.69%, which is greater than PATN's maximum drawdown of -16.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGGY and PATN.

Drawdown Indicators

	IGGY	PATN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.69%	-16.77%	-2.92%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-14.40%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.63%	-4.89%	-3.74%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.39%	-3.17%	-4.22%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	3.73%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	IGGY	PATN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	12.31%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	21.47%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.04%	23.91%	-3.87%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.04%	22.25%	-2.21%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.04%	22.25%	-2.21%

IGGY vs. PATN - Expense Ratio Comparison

IGGY has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than PATN's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

IGGY vs. PATN - Dividend Comparison

IGGY has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PATN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.61%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
IGGY AB International Growth ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PATN Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF	1.61%	2.25%	0.30%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IGGY and PATN in my portfolio?

IGGY and PATN have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, IGGY or PATN?

On fees, IGGY is cheaper at 0.55% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, IGGY or PATN?

IGGY is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for PATN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IGGY or PATN?

PATN has the higher dividend yield at 1.61%, compared with 0.00% for IGGY.

What is the main difference between IGGY and PATN?

They also come from different issuers: AllianceBernstein and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for IGGY and 0.65% for PATN.