IGE vs. ENFR
IGE (iShares North American Natural Resources ETF) and ENFR (Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IGE is a Energy Equities fund tracking the S&P North American Natural Resources Sector Index, while ENFR is a Infrastructure Equities fund tracking the Alerian Midstream Energy Select Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IGE returned 9.18%/yr vs 11.73%/yr for ENFR. Their 0.79 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. IGE charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for ENFR.
Performance
IGE vs. ENFR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IGE achieves a 20.18% return, which is significantly lower than ENFR's 27.46% return. Over the past 10 years, IGE has underperformed ENFR with an annualized return of 9.18%, while ENFR has yielded a comparatively higher 11.73% annualized return.
IGE
- 1D
- -0.38%
- 1M
- 5.82%
- 6M
- 8.49%
- YTD
- 20.18%
- 1Y
- 37.23%
- 3Y*
- 16.00%
- 5Y*
- 19.32%
- 10Y*
- 9.18%
- ALL TIME*
- 7.92%
ENFR
- 1D
- -0.63%
- 1M
- 3.26%
- 6M
- 20.04%
- YTD
- 27.46%
- 1Y
- 28.20%
- 3Y*
- 26.81%
- 5Y*
- 22.10%
- 10Y*
- 11.73%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.53%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $5.48M | $4.07M | $3.20M | |
| $9.13M | $6.85M | $9.74M |
IGE vs. ENFR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGE iShares North American Natural Resources ETF | 20.18% | 20.41% | 7.55% | 3.12% | 33.24% | 39.42% | -19.58% | 17.16% | -21.59% | 0.82% |
ENFR Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF | 27.46% | 5.88% | 42.17% | 15.63% | 17.48% | 39.97% | -24.14% | 21.60% | -18.67% | -0.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between IGE and ENFR is 0.62, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.62 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.71 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.81 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 2013 | 0.79 |
The correlation between IGE and ENFR shifts across timeframes, from 0.62 (1 year) to 0.81 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IGE vs. ENFR — Risk / Return Rank
IGE
ENFR
IGE vs. ENFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares North American Natural Resources ETF (IGE) and Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IGE | ENFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.32 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.24 | 3.28 | -0.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.98 | 8.01 | +1.97 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IGE vs. ENFR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IGE drawdown since its inception was -67.55%, roughly equal to the maximum ENFR drawdown of -68.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGE and ENFR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IGE | ENFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.55% | -68.28% | +0.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.54% | -8.64% | -2.90% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.49% | -15.58% | -3.91% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.72% | -20.29% | -5.43% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -60.57% | -62.64% | +2.07% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.07% | -3.18% | -1.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.82% | -15.82% | -3.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.74% | 3.53% | +0.21% |
Volatility
IGE vs. ENFR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares North American Natural Resources ETF (IGE) is 3.87%, while Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR) has a volatility of 5.48%. This indicates that IGE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ENFR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IGE | ENFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.87% | 5.48% | -1.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.59% | 12.31% | +0.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.54% | 15.26% | +1.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.22% | 19.20% | +3.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.86% | 24.65% | +0.21% |
IGE vs. ENFR - Expense Ratio Comparison
IGE has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than ENFR's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
IGE vs. ENFR - Dividend Comparison
IGE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.99%, less than ENFR's 3.94% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ENFR Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF | 3.94% | 4.77% | 4.41% | 5.48% | 5.23% | 7.86% | 7.57% | 5.81% | 3.98% | 2.98% | 3.31% | 3.34% |
IGE iShares North American Natural Resources ETF | 1.99% | 2.32% | 2.54% | 2.85% | 2.96% | 2.92% | 3.34% | 5.55% | 2.68% | 2.11% | 1.66% | 3.08% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IGE and ENFR have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ENFR has higher volatility (5.48%) compared to IGE (3.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IGE dropped -67.55% vs ENFR's -68.28%.
On 10-year performance, ENFR leads with 11.73% vs 9.18% for IGE. On fees, ENFR is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, IGE has been the lower-risk option at 3.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, ENFR has performed better with a 11.73% return vs 9.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ENFR is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for IGE.
ENFR has the higher dividend yield at 3.94%, compared with 1.99% for IGE.
IGE is categorized as Energy Equities, while ENFR is Infrastructure Equities. IGE tracks S&P North American Natural Resources Sector Index, while ENFR tracks Alerian Midstream Energy Select Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and SS&C. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for IGE and 0.35% for ENFR.
IGE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.27 vs 1.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IGE and ENFR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer