IGB.TO vs. PDF.TO

Last updated Jul 25, 2026

IGB.TO (Purpose Global Bond Class) and PDF.TO (Purpose Core Dividend Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - IGB.TO is a Global Bonds fund actively managed by Purpose Investments Inc., while PDF.TO is a Dividend fund actively managed by Purpose Investments Inc.. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, IGB.TO returned 2.38%/yr vs 12.14%/yr for PDF.TO. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IGB.TO charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.66%/yr for PDF.TO.

Performance

IGB.TO vs. PDF.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Purpose Global Bond Class (IGB.TO) and Purpose Core Dividend Fund (PDF.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IGB.TO achieves a -0.32% return, which is significantly lower than PDF.TO's 20.07% return.

IGB.TO

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -1.48%
• 6M: -0.65%
• YTD: -0.32%
• 1Y: 1.77%
• 3Y*: 5.79%
• 5Y*: 2.38%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 2.74%

PDF.TO

• 1D: 0.62%
• 1M: 2.88%
• 6M: 16.53%
• YTD: 20.07%
• 1Y: 33.26%
• 3Y*: 18.64%
• 5Y*: 12.14%
• 10Y*: 9.50%
• ALL TIME*: 10.45%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
IGB.TO Purpose Global Bond Class	CA$95.58K	CA$158.59K	CA$295.38K
PDF.TO Purpose Core Dividend Fund	CA$201.50K	CA$240.90K	CA$226.04K

IGB.TO vs. PDF.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
IGB.TO Purpose Global Bond Class	-0.32%	6.05%	7.47%	7.40%	-7.68%	2.50%	6.12%	3.21%	-1.63%
PDF.TO Purpose Core Dividend Fund	20.07%	20.44%	13.61%	4.13%	-1.74%	24.35%	-0.79%	23.25%	-8.13%

Correlation

The correlation between IGB.TO and PDF.TO is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.22
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.20
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.20
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2018	0.16

Return for Risk

IGB.TO vs. PDF.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IGB.TO

IGB.TO Risk / Return Rank: 25
IGB.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 27
IGB.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 25
IGB.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 26
IGB.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
IGB.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 26

PDF.TO

PDF.TO Risk / Return Rank: 97
PDF.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
PDF.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
PDF.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 97
PDF.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
PDF.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IGB.TO vs. PDF.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Purpose Global Bond Class (IGB.TO) and Purpose Core Dividend Fund (PDF.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IGB.TO	PDF.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.63	3.99	-3.36
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.95	5.81	-4.87
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.12	1.74	-0.62
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.62	5.26	-4.64
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.16	23.86	-21.70

IGB.TO vs. PDF.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IGB.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.63, which is lower than the PDF.TO Sharpe Ratio of 3.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IGB.TO and PDF.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

IGB.TO vs. PDF.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IGB.TO drawdown since its inception was -16.40%, smaller than the maximum PDF.TO drawdown of -36.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGB.TO and PDF.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	IGB.TO	PDF.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.40%	-36.00%	+19.60%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.86%	-6.35%	+3.49%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-4.28%	-9.28%	+5.00%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-12.34%	-15.81%	+3.47%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-36.00%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.60%	-0.51%	-1.09%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.37%	-3.45%	+1.08%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.82%	1.40%	-0.58%

Volatility

IGB.TO vs. PDF.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Purpose Global Bond Class (IGB.TO) is 0.73%, while Purpose Core Dividend Fund (PDF.TO) has a volatility of 2.48%. This indicates that IGB.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PDF.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IGB.TO	PDF.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.73%	2.48%	-1.75%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.37%	6.86%	-4.49%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.81%	8.38%	-5.57%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.79%	10.33%	-5.54%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.75%	13.58%	-7.83%

IGB.TO vs. PDF.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

IGB.TO has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than PDF.TO's 0.66% expense ratio.

Dividends

IGB.TO vs. PDF.TO - Dividend Comparison

IGB.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.86%, more than PDF.TO's 2.79% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IGB.TO Purpose Global Bond Class	4.86%	5.18%	5.23%	4.58%	4.14%	3.67%	3.48%	2.86%	1.58%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PDF.TO Purpose Core Dividend Fund	2.79%	3.49%	3.82%	4.17%	3.77%	3.19%	3.84%	3.65%	4.33%	3.50%	3.38%	3.40%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IGB.TO and PDF.TO in my portfolio?

IGB.TO and PDF.TO have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, IGB.TO or PDF.TO?

On fees, IGB.TO is cheaper at 0.55% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, IGB.TO or PDF.TO?

IGB.TO is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.66% for PDF.TO.

What is the main difference between IGB.TO and PDF.TO?

IGB.TO is categorized as Global Bonds, while PDF.TO is Dividend. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for IGB.TO and 0.66% for PDF.TO.