PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IGB.TO vs. PAYF.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IGB.TO vs. PAYF.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Purpose Global Bond Class (IGB.TO) and Purpose Enhanced Premium Yield Fund (PAYF.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IGB.TO achieves a -0.32% return, which is significantly lower than PAYF.TO's 3.05% return.


IGB.TO

1D
0.00%
1M
-1.48%
6M
-0.65%
YTD
-0.32%
1Y
1.77%
3Y*
5.79%
5Y*
2.38%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
2.74%

PAYF.TO

1D
0.27%
1M
1.03%
6M
3.10%
YTD
3.05%
1Y
4.97%
3Y*
9.76%
5Y*
7.55%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
7.21%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CA$95.58KCA$158.59KCA$295.38K
CA$14.58KCA$14.42KCA$25.69K

IGB.TO vs. PAYF.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
IGB.TO
Purpose Global Bond Class
-0.32%6.05%7.47%7.40%-7.68%2.50%6.12%0.99%
PAYF.TO
Purpose Enhanced Premium Yield Fund
3.05%9.96%11.58%13.46%-3.26%8.85%2.97%5.92%

Correlation

The correlation between IGB.TO and PAYF.TO is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 24, 2019

0.15

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IGB.TO vs. PAYF.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IGB.TO
IGB.TO Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
IGB.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IGB.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
IGB.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
IGB.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
IGB.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

PAYF.TO
PAYF.TO Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
PAYF.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PAYF.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
PAYF.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
PAYF.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
PAYF.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IGB.TO vs. PAYF.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Purpose Global Bond Class (IGB.TO) and Purpose Enhanced Premium Yield Fund (PAYF.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IGB.TOPAYF.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.14

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.62

0.87

-0.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.16

3.13

-0.97

IGB.TO vs. PAYF.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IGB.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.63, which is comparable to the PAYF.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IGB.TO and PAYF.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IGB.TO vs. PAYF.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IGB.TO drawdown since its inception was -16.40%, roughly equal to the maximum PAYF.TO drawdown of -17.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGB.TO and PAYF.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IGB.TOPAYF.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.40%

-17.09%

+0.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.86%

-5.73%

+2.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.28%

-11.66%

+7.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.34%

-11.66%

-0.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.60%

-0.91%

-0.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.37%

-1.85%

-0.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.82%

1.59%

-0.77%

Volatility

IGB.TO vs. PAYF.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Purpose Global Bond Class (IGB.TO) is 0.73%, while Purpose Enhanced Premium Yield Fund (PAYF.TO) has a volatility of 2.31%. This indicates that IGB.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PAYF.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IGB.TOPAYF.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.73%

2.31%

-1.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.37%

6.35%

-3.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.81%

7.02%

-4.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.79%

9.66%

-4.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.75%

9.51%

-3.76%

IGB.TO vs. PAYF.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

IGB.TO has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than PAYF.TO's 0.94% expense ratio.


Dividends

IGB.TO vs. PAYF.TO - Dividend Comparison

IGB.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.86%, less than PAYF.TO's 8.88% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
IGB.TO
Purpose Global Bond Class
4.86%5.18%5.23%4.58%4.14%3.67%3.48%2.86%1.58%
PAYF.TO
Purpose Enhanced Premium Yield Fund
8.88%8.75%8.82%8.91%8.02%7.17%7.27%4.05%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IGB.TO and PAYF.TO have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IGB.TO is cheaper at 0.55% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IGB.TO is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.94% for PAYF.TO.

IGB.TO is categorized as Global Bonds, while PAYF.TO is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for IGB.TO and 0.94% for PAYF.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IGB.TO and PAYF.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer