PDF.TO vs. PID.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about Purpose Core Dividend Fund Series ETF (PDF.TO) and Purpose International Dividend Fund (PID.TO).
PDF.TO and PID.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day.
Performance
PDF.TO vs. PID.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PDF.TO vs. PID.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PDF.TO Purpose Core Dividend Fund Series ETF | 5.85% | 20.81% | 13.61% | 4.13% | -1.74% | 24.35% | -0.79% | 23.25% | -11.14% | 7.37% |
PID.TO Purpose International Dividend Fund | 4.59% | 33.40% | 13.85% | 15.75% | -2.67% | 8.95% | -3.24% | 14.04% | 0.49% | 11.86% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PDF.TO achieves a 5.85% return, which is significantly higher than PID.TO's 4.59% return. Over the past 10 years, PDF.TO has underperformed PID.TO with an annualized return of 8.85%, while PID.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 9.85% annualized return.
PDF.TO
- 1D
- 1.52%
- 1M
- -3.48%
- YTD
- 5.85%
- 6M
- 10.43%
- 1Y
- 21.70%
- 3Y*
- 14.54%
- 5Y*
- 10.84%
- 10Y*
- 8.85%
PID.TO
- 1D
- 2.77%
- 1M
- -5.39%
- YTD
- 4.59%
- 6M
- 11.69%
- 1Y
- 24.07%
- 3Y*
- 19.93%
- 5Y*
- 13.67%
- 10Y*
- 9.85%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PDF.TO vs. PID.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
Return for Risk
PDF.TO vs. PID.TO — Risk / Return Rank
PDF.TO
PID.TO
PDF.TO vs. PID.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Purpose Core Dividend Fund Series ETF (PDF.TO) and Purpose International Dividend Fund (PID.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PDF.TO | PID.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.14 | 1.60 | +0.53 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.77 | 2.10 | +0.66 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.31 | +0.13 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.41 | 2.13 | +0.28 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.16 | 8.08 | +3.08 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PDF.TO | PID.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.14 | 1.60 | +0.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.06 | 1.13 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.66 | 0.71 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.75 | 0.61 | +0.13 |
Correlation
The correlation between PDF.TO and PID.TO is 0.48, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
PDF.TO vs. PID.TO - Dividend Comparison
PDF.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.14%, more than PID.TO's 3.00% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PDF.TO Purpose Core Dividend Fund Series ETF | 3.14% | 3.77% | 3.82% | 4.17% | 3.77% | 3.19% | 3.84% | 3.65% | 4.33% | 3.50% | 3.38% | 3.40% |
PID.TO Purpose International Dividend Fund | 3.00% | 3.12% | 4.02% | 4.39% | 4.86% | 5.61% | 4.64% | 4.28% | 4.67% | 3.53% | 3.49% | 2.06% |
Drawdowns
PDF.TO vs. PID.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PDF.TO drawdown since its inception was -36.00%, which is greater than PID.TO's maximum drawdown of -27.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PDF.TO and PID.TO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PDF.TO | PID.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.00% | -27.27% | -8.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.28% | -11.09% | +1.81% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.93% | -19.11% | +3.18% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.00% | -27.27% | -8.73% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.55% | -5.85% | +2.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.53% | -4.11% | +0.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.00% | 2.93% | -0.93% |
Volatility
PDF.TO vs. PID.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Purpose Core Dividend Fund Series ETF (PDF.TO) is 3.79%, while Purpose International Dividend Fund (PID.TO) has a volatility of 7.57%. This indicates that PDF.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PID.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PDF.TO | PID.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.79% | 7.57% | -3.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.19% | 10.73% | -4.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.22% | 15.09% | -4.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.30% | 12.21% | -1.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.58% | 13.93% | -0.35% |