IG vs. PSET
IG (Principal Investment Grade Corporate Active ETF) and PSET (Principal Quality ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IG is a Corporate Bonds fund actively managed by Principal, while PSET is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ US Price Setters. IG is actively managed, while PSET is passively managed. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IG charges 0.26%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for PSET.
Performance
IG vs. PSET - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
IG
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- 0.57%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PSET
- 1D
- -0.77%
- 1M
- 2.67%
- YTD
- -0.49%
- 6M
- -0.66%
- 1Y
- 7.57%
- 3Y*
- 12.93%
- 5Y*
- 8.86%
- 10Y*
- 12.73%
IG vs. PSET - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
IG Principal Investment Grade Corporate Active ETF | -0.22% |
PSET Principal Quality ETF | 0.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between IG and PSET is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 23, 2026 | 0.70 |
IG vs. PSET - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IG
PSET
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
IG
PSET
Basic Materials
IG
-
PSET
Communication Services
IG
-
PSET
Consumer Cyclical
IG
-
PSET
Consumer Defensive
IG
-
PSET
Energy
IG
-
PSET
Healthcare
IG
-
PSET
Industrials
IG
-
PSET
Real Estate
IG
-
PSET
-
Technology
IG
-
PSET
Utilities
IG
-
PSET
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IG vs. PSET — Risk / Return Rank
IG
PSET
IG vs. PSET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal Investment Grade Corporate Active ETF (IG) and Principal Quality ETF (PSET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IG | PSET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.60 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.51 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.71 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.40 | 0.71 | -1.11 |
Drawdowns
IG vs. PSET - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IG drawdown since its inception was -1.75%, smaller than the maximum PSET drawdown of -34.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IG and PSET.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IG | PSET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.75% | -34.74% | +32.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -12.94% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -21.96% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.61% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.74% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.32% | -2.59% | +2.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.53% | -4.59% | +4.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.82% | — |
Volatility
IG vs. PSET - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IG | PSET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.01% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 9.67% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.90% | 12.67% | -7.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.90% | 17.51% | -12.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.90% | 18.06% | -13.16% |
IG vs. PSET - Expense Ratio Comparison
IG has a 0.26% expense ratio, which is higher than PSET's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IG vs. PSET - Dividend Comparison
IG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.84%, more than PSET's 0.63% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IG Principal Investment Grade Corporate Active ETF | 0.84% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PSET Principal Quality ETF | 0.63% | 0.59% | 0.69% | 0.85% | 1.47% | 0.89% | 1.09% | 1.52% | 1.33% | 1.02% | 1.26% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IG and PSET have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PSET is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PSET is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.26% for IG.
IG has the higher dividend yield at 0.84%, compared with 0.63% for PSET.
IG is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while PSET is Large Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.26% for IG and 0.15% for PSET.
Find the right allocation for IG and PSET
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer