IG vs. CEMB

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

IG (Principal Investment Grade Corporate Active ETF) and CEMB (iShares J.P. Morgan EM Corporate Bond ETF) are both Corporate Bonds funds. IG is actively managed, while CEMB is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IG charges 0.26%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for CEMB.

Performance

IG vs. CEMB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Principal Investment Grade Corporate Active ETF (IG) and iShares J.P. Morgan EM Corporate Bond ETF (CEMB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

IG

• 1D: -0.23%
• 1M: 0.57%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CEMB

• 1D: -0.20%
• 1M: 0.46%
• YTD: 1.49%
• 6M: 1.83%
• 1Y: 7.31%
• 3Y*: 7.31%
• 5Y*: 1.97%
• 10Y*: 3.49%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IG vs. CEMB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
IG Principal Investment Grade Corporate Active ETF	-0.22%
CEMB iShares J.P. Morgan EM Corporate Bond ETF	0.25%

Correlation

The correlation between IG and CEMB is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 23, 2026	0.85

IG vs. CEMB - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IG	CEMB
Financial Services	2.9%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	100.0%
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

IG vs. CEMB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CEMB

CEMB Risk / Return Rank: 69
CEMB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
CEMB Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
CEMB Omega Ratio Rank: 78
CEMB Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
CEMB Martin Ratio Rank: 62

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IG vs. CEMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal Investment Grade Corporate Active ETF (IG) and iShares J.P. Morgan EM Corporate Bond ETF (CEMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IG	CEMB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.40	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.35	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.56	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.40	0.49	-0.89

Drawdowns

IG vs. CEMB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IG drawdown since its inception was -1.75%, smaller than the maximum CEMB drawdown of -20.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IG and CEMB.

Drawdown Indicators

	IG	CEMB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-1.75%	-20.84%	+19.09%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-2.88%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-3.85%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-20.48%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-20.84%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.32%	-0.24%	-0.08%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.53%	-3.66%	+3.13%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.66%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	IG	CEMB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	1.08%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	2.43%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.90%	3.06%	+1.84%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.90%	5.63%	-0.73%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.90%	6.30%	-1.40%

IG vs. CEMB - Expense Ratio Comparison

IG has a 0.26% expense ratio, which is lower than CEMB's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

IG vs. CEMB - Dividend Comparison

IG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.84%, less than CEMB's 5.13% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CEMB iShares J.P. Morgan EM Corporate Bond ETF	5.13%	5.14%	5.11%	4.77%	4.29%	3.51%	3.86%	4.19%	4.66%	4.06%	4.26%	4.76%
IG Principal Investment Grade Corporate Active ETF	0.84%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IG and CEMB in my portfolio?

IG and CEMB have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, IG or CEMB?

On fees, IG is cheaper at 0.26% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, IG or CEMB?

IG is cheaper with a 0.26% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for CEMB.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IG or CEMB?

CEMB has the higher dividend yield at 5.13%, compared with 0.84% for IG.

What is the main difference between IG and CEMB?

They also come from different issuers: Principal and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.26% for IG and 0.50% for CEMB.