CEMB vs. IAGG
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares J.P. Morgan EM Corporate Bond ETF (CEMB) and iShares Core International Aggregate Bond ETF (IAGG).
CEMB and IAGG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CEMB is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the JP Morgan CEMBI Broad Diversified. It was launched on Apr 17, 2012. IAGG is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Barclays Global Aggregate ex USD 10% Issuer Capped (Hedged) Index. It was launched on Nov 10, 2015. Both CEMB and IAGG are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CEMB or IAGG.
Correlation
The correlation between CEMB and IAGG is 0.02, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
CEMB vs. IAGG - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
CEMB:
1.64
IAGG:
2.02
CEMB:
2.21
IAGG:
3.02
CEMB:
1.35
IAGG:
1.37
CEMB:
1.07
IAGG:
1.09
CEMB:
7.79
IAGG:
11.23
CEMB:
0.96%
IAGG:
0.59%
CEMB:
4.54%
IAGG:
3.28%
CEMB:
-20.84%
IAGG:
-13.88%
CEMB:
-0.71%
IAGG:
-0.06%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CEMB achieves a 2.10% return, which is significantly higher than IAGG's 1.52% return.
CEMB
2.10%
-0.41%
1.43%
7.92%
3.27%
3.17%
IAGG
1.52%
1.69%
2.32%
7.22%
0.74%
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CEMB vs. IAGG - Expense Ratio Comparison
CEMB has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than IAGG's 0.09% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CEMB vs. IAGG — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
CEMB
IAGG
CEMB vs. IAGG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares J.P. Morgan EM Corporate Bond ETF (CEMB) and iShares Core International Aggregate Bond ETF (IAGG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
CEMB vs. IAGG - Dividend Comparison
CEMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.19%, more than IAGG's 4.21% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CEMB iShares J.P. Morgan EM Corporate Bond ETF | 5.19% | 5.11% | 4.77% | 4.29% | 3.51% | 3.86% | 4.19% | 4.66% | 4.06% | 4.26% | 4.76% | 4.23% |
IAGG iShares Core International Aggregate Bond ETF | 4.21% | 4.28% | 3.55% | 2.28% | 1.16% | 1.95% | 2.82% | 3.02% | 1.74% | 1.56% | 0.13% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
CEMB vs. IAGG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CEMB drawdown since its inception was -20.84%, which is greater than IAGG's maximum drawdown of -13.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEMB and IAGG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
CEMB vs. IAGG - Volatility Comparison
iShares J.P. Morgan EM Corporate Bond ETF (CEMB) has a higher volatility of 3.19% compared to iShares Core International Aggregate Bond ETF (IAGG) at 0.77%. This indicates that CEMB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IAGG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.