PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IFX.DE vs. CDNS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

IFX.DE vs. CDNS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Infineon Technologies AG (IFX.DE) and Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (CDNS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IFX.DE is traded in EUR, while CDNS is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the CDNS values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IFX.DE achieves a 135.03% return, which is significantly higher than CDNS's 32.09% return. Over the past 10 years, IFX.DE has underperformed CDNS with an annualized return of 22.14%, while CDNS has yielded a comparatively higher 32.09% annualized return.


IFX.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
54.90%
YTD
135.03%
6M
141.33%
1Y
158.08%
3Y*
36.19%
5Y*
22.48%
10Y*
22.14%

CDNS

1D
-1.80%
1M
17.57%
YTD
32.09%
6M
22.05%
1Y
36.32%
3Y*
17.90%
5Y*
27.53%
10Y*
32.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IFX.DE vs. CDNS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IFX.DE
Infineon Technologies AG
135.03%21.26%-16.04%34.15%-29.66%30.66%56.50%18.59%-23.09%40.10%
CDNS
Cadence Design Systems, Inc.
32.09%-8.31%17.60%64.47%-8.45%46.81%80.49%63.13%8.85%45.44%

Correlation

The correlation between IFX.DE and CDNS is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.28

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 27, 2007

0.32

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IFX.DE vs. CDNS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IFX.DE
IFX.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
IFX.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IFX.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
IFX.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
IFX.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
IFX.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

CDNS
CDNS Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
CDNS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CDNS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
CDNS Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
CDNS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
CDNS Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IFX.DE vs. CDNS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Infineon Technologies AG (IFX.DE) and Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (CDNS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IFX.DECDNSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.64

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.20

+0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.41

1.20

+6.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.89

2.46

+14.43

IFX.DE vs. CDNS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IFX.DE Sharpe Ratio is 3.61, which is higher than the CDNS Sharpe Ratio of 0.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IFX.DE and CDNS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IFX.DECDNSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.61

0.96

+2.64

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

0.77

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

0.94

-0.36

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.04

0.47

-0.42

Drawdowns

IFX.DE vs. CDNS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IFX.DE drawdown since its inception was -99.57%, which is greater than CDNS's maximum drawdown of -88.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IFX.DE and CDNS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IFX.DECDNSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.57%

-88.19%

-11.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.20%

-30.38%

+9.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-37.93%

-32.15%

-5.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-51.12%

-32.15%

-18.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-56.99%

-34.02%

-22.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.80%

+1.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-75.88%

-24.28%

-51.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.32%

14.81%

-5.49%

Volatility

IFX.DE vs. CDNS - Volatility Comparison

Infineon Technologies AG (IFX.DE) has a higher volatility of 19.44% compared to Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (CDNS) at 12.37%. This indicates that IFX.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CDNS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IFX.DECDNSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

19.44%

12.37%

+7.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

35.82%

30.44%

+5.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

43.58%

37.94%

+5.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

39.33%

35.77%

+3.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

37.93%

34.25%

+3.68%

Dividends

IFX.DE vs. CDNS - Dividend Comparison

IFX.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.40%, while CDNS has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CDNS
Cadence Design Systems, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IFX.DE
Infineon Technologies AG
0.40%0.93%1.11%0.85%0.95%0.54%0.86%1.33%1.44%0.96%1.21%1.33%

Financials

IFX.DE vs. CDNS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Infineon Technologies AG and Cadence Design Systems, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Please note, different currencies. IFX.DE values in EUR, CDNS values in USD

Frequently Asked Questions


IFX.DE and CDNS have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IFX.DE and CDNS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer