PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SIVLX vs. DEMCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SIVLX vs. DEMCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Seafarer Overseas Value Fund Institutional Class (SIVLX) and Nomura Emerging Markets Fund Class C (DEMCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SIVLX achieves a 7.60% return, which is significantly lower than DEMCX's 133.75% return.


SIVLX

1D
0.11%
1M
-1.62%
YTD
7.60%
6M
8.04%
1Y
27.40%
3Y*
14.02%
5Y*
9.47%
10Y*

DEMCX

1D
8.20%
1M
23.60%
YTD
133.75%
6M
150.69%
1Y
251.28%
3Y*
67.83%
5Y*
28.09%
10Y*
21.74%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SIVLX vs. DEMCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SIVLX
Seafarer Overseas Value Fund Institutional Class
7.60%37.79%-3.34%13.38%-0.74%10.05%4.05%21.98%-13.91%23.02%
DEMCX
Nomura Emerging Markets Fund Class C
133.75%84.86%5.47%16.47%-29.38%-3.05%24.55%23.16%-17.94%40.59%

Correlation

The correlation between SIVLX and DEMCX is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.56

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2017

0.67

The correlation between SIVLX and DEMCX shifts across timeframes, from 0.47 (1 year) to 0.67 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SIVLX vs. DEMCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SIVLX
SIVLX Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
SIVLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SIVLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
SIVLX Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
SIVLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
SIVLX Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

DEMCX
DEMCX Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
DEMCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DEMCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
DEMCX Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
DEMCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
DEMCX Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SIVLX vs. DEMCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Seafarer Overseas Value Fund Institutional Class (SIVLX) and Nomura Emerging Markets Fund Class C (DEMCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SIVLXDEMCXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.88

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.78

-0.37

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.14

12.22

-10.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.51

44.57

-38.06

SIVLX vs. DEMCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SIVLX Sharpe Ratio is 2.07, which is lower than the DEMCX Sharpe Ratio of 5.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SIVLX and DEMCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SIVLX vs. DEMCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SIVLX drawdown since its inception was -33.09%, smaller than the maximum DEMCX drawdown of -63.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIVLX and DEMCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SIVLXDEMCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.09%

-63.54%

+30.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.51%

-21.11%

+8.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.51%

-23.22%

+10.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.39%

-43.73%

+27.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.12%

0.00%

-7.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.60%

-19.60%

+14.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.10%

5.77%

-1.67%

Volatility

SIVLX vs. DEMCX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Seafarer Overseas Value Fund Institutional Class (SIVLX) is 5.23%, while Nomura Emerging Markets Fund Class C (DEMCX) has a volatility of 25.52%. This indicates that SIVLX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DEMCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SIVLXDEMCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.23%

25.52%

-20.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.34%

41.20%

-29.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.92%

45.10%

-32.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.92%

27.51%

-15.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.67%

24.32%

-11.65%

SIVLX vs. DEMCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SIVLX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is lower than DEMCX's 2.17% expense ratio.


Dividends

SIVLX vs. DEMCX - Dividend Comparison

SIVLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.69%, less than DEMCX's 8.76% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
DEMCX
Nomura Emerging Markets Fund Class C
8.76%20.47%1.09%2.03%0.69%2.58%0.61%0.00%0.00%1.03%0.08%
SIVLX
Seafarer Overseas Value Fund Institutional Class
4.69%5.05%4.23%2.93%1.70%3.56%1.38%3.06%3.30%3.41%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SIVLX and DEMCX have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DEMCX has higher volatility (25.52%) compared to SIVLX (5.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SIVLX dropped -33.09% vs DEMCX's -63.54%.

DEMCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.72 vs 2.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SIVLX and DEMCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer