PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IFN vs. DEMAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IFN vs. DEMAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The India Fund (IFN) and Nomura Emerging Markets Fund Class A (DEMAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IFN achieves a -15.46% return, which is significantly lower than DEMAX's 112.66% return. Over the past 10 years, IFN has underperformed DEMAX with an annualized return of 5.99%, while DEMAX has yielded a comparatively higher 21.48% annualized return.


IFN

1D
-1.45%
1M
-5.23%
YTD
-15.46%
6M
-17.27%
1Y
-22.15%
3Y*
0.84%
5Y*
0.25%
10Y*
5.99%

DEMAX

1D
2.49%
1M
25.80%
YTD
112.66%
6M
130.03%
1Y
252.48%
3Y*
66.41%
5Y*
25.77%
10Y*
21.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IFN vs. DEMAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IFN
The India Fund
-15.46%0.42%-2.26%36.48%-15.85%22.31%12.25%11.27%-5.33%37.15%
DEMAX
Nomura Emerging Markets Fund Class A
112.66%86.33%6.25%17.34%-28.85%-2.32%25.54%24.05%-17.32%41.62%

Correlation

The correlation between IFN and DEMAX is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.33

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 11, 1996

0.53

Over the past year, the correlation between IFN and DEMAX has dropped to 0.23 - well below their long-term average of 0.53, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IFN vs. DEMAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IFN
IFN Risk / Return Rank: 00
Overall Rank
IFN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IFN Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
IFN Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
IFN Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
IFN Martin Ratio Rank: 00
Martin Ratio Rank

DEMAX
DEMAX Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
DEMAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DEMAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
DEMAX Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
DEMAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
DEMAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IFN vs. DEMAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The India Fund (IFN) and Nomura Emerging Markets Fund Class A (DEMAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IFNDEMAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-8.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-7.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.79

1.88

-1.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.85

12.27

-13.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.88

46.65

-48.53

IFN vs. DEMAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IFN Sharpe Ratio is -1.35, which is lower than the DEMAX Sharpe Ratio of 6.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IFN and DEMAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IFNDEMAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.35

6.72

-8.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.01

1.02

-1.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.32

0.93

-0.61

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.23

0.53

-0.30

Drawdowns

IFN vs. DEMAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IFN drawdown since its inception was -71.52%, which is greater than DEMAX's maximum drawdown of -63.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IFN and DEMAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IFNDEMAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.52%

-63.23%

-8.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.05%

-21.03%

-5.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.53%

-22.75%

-8.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.53%

-44.15%

+12.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.48%

-46.51%

+5.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-29.31%

0.00%

-29.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.89%

-18.75%

-7.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.78%

5.51%

+6.27%

Volatility

IFN vs. DEMAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for The India Fund (IFN) is 5.53%, while Nomura Emerging Markets Fund Class A (DEMAX) has a volatility of 17.08%. This indicates that IFN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DEMAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IFNDEMAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.53%

17.08%

-11.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.39%

33.82%

-20.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.41%

38.39%

-21.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.67%

25.33%

-7.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.90%

23.14%

-4.24%

IFN vs. DEMAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

IFN has a 0.01% expense ratio, which is lower than DEMAX's 1.42% expense ratio.


Dividends

IFN vs. DEMAX - Dividend Comparison

IFN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 20.07%, more than DEMAX's 8.95% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DEMAX
Nomura Emerging Markets Fund Class A
8.95%19.03%1.74%2.76%1.60%3.16%0.56%0.57%0.34%1.59%0.70%0.03%
IFN
The India Fund
20.07%16.09%14.60%8.97%21.47%15.21%9.77%11.57%22.25%12.11%7.97%8.02%

Frequently Asked Questions


IFN and DEMAX have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DEMAX has higher volatility (17.08%) compared to IFN (5.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IFN dropped -71.52% vs DEMAX's -63.23%.

DEMAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.72 vs -1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IFN and DEMAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer