IFLR vs. VXUS
IFLR (Innovator International Developed Managed Floor ETF) and VXUS (Vanguard Total International Stock ETF) are both Global Equities funds. IFLR is actively managed, while VXUS is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IFLR charges 0.89%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for VXUS.
Performance
IFLR vs. VXUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IFLR achieves a 5.52% return, which is significantly lower than VXUS's 13.40% return.
IFLR
- 1D
- 0.83%
- 1M
- 0.53%
- YTD
- 5.52%
- 6M
- 5.18%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VXUS
- 1D
- 0.88%
- 1M
- -0.75%
- YTD
- 13.40%
- 6M
- 13.15%
- 1Y
- 28.83%
- 3Y*
- 19.12%
- 5Y*
- 8.42%
- 10Y*
- 10.52%
IFLR vs. VXUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
IFLR Innovator International Developed Managed Floor ETF | 5.52% | 3.03% |
VXUS Vanguard Total International Stock ETF | 13.40% | 5.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between IFLR and VXUS is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2025 | 0.90 |
IFLR vs. VXUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IFLR
VXUS
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Utilities
Energy
Real Estate
Financial Services
IFLR
VXUS
Industrials
IFLR
VXUS
Technology
IFLR
VXUS
Healthcare
IFLR
VXUS
Consumer Cyclical
IFLR
VXUS
Consumer Defensive
IFLR
VXUS
Basic Materials
IFLR
VXUS
Communication Services
IFLR
VXUS
Utilities
IFLR
VXUS
Energy
IFLR
VXUS
Real Estate
IFLR
VXUS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IFLR vs. VXUS — Risk / Return Rank
IFLR
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
VXUS
IFLR vs. VXUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator International Developed Managed Floor ETF (IFLR) and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IFLR | VXUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.33 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.57 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 9.84 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IFLR vs. VXUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IFLR drawdown since its inception was -9.58%, smaller than the maximum VXUS drawdown of -35.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IFLR and VXUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IFLR | VXUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.58% | -35.97% | +26.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -11.27% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -13.58% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -29.44% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.97% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.10% | -2.27% | +0.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.72% | -8.19% | +5.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.94% | — |
Volatility
IFLR vs. VXUS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IFLR | VXUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.84% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 14.45% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.52% | 16.30% | -2.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.52% | 16.27% | -2.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.52% | 17.02% | -3.50% |
IFLR vs. VXUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
IFLR has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than VXUS's 0.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
IFLR vs. VXUS - Dividend Comparison
IFLR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.28%, less than VXUS's 2.57% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IFLR Innovator International Developed Managed Floor ETF | 0.28% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VXUS Vanguard Total International Stock ETF | 2.57% | 3.18% | 3.37% | 3.24% | 3.09% | 3.10% | 2.14% | 3.06% | 3.18% | 2.73% | 2.93% | 2.83% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.90, IFLR and VXUS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, VXUS is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VXUS is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for IFLR.
VXUS has the higher dividend yield at 2.57%, compared with 0.28% for IFLR.
They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.89% for IFLR and 0.05% for VXUS.
Find the right allocation for IFLR and VXUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer