IFLR vs. SFLR
IFLR (Innovator International Developed Managed Floor ETF) and SFLR (Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IFLR is a Global Equities fund actively managed by Innovator, while SFLR is a Options Trading fund actively managed by Innovator. Both are actively managed. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.89% expense ratio.
Performance
IFLR vs. SFLR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IFLR achieves a 5.52% return, which is significantly higher than SFLR's 3.18% return.
IFLR
- 1D
- 0.83%
- 1M
- 0.53%
- YTD
- 5.52%
- 6M
- 5.18%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SFLR
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- -1.40%
- YTD
- 3.18%
- 6M
- 2.58%
- 1Y
- 14.42%
- 3Y*
- 14.89%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IFLR vs. SFLR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
IFLR Innovator International Developed Managed Floor ETF | 5.52% | 3.03% |
SFLR Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF | 3.18% | 2.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between IFLR and SFLR is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2025 | 0.68 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IFLR vs. SFLR — Risk / Return Rank
IFLR
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SFLR
IFLR vs. SFLR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator International Developed Managed Floor ETF (IFLR) and Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF (SFLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IFLR | SFLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.28 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.13 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 8.27 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IFLR vs. SFLR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IFLR drawdown since its inception was -9.58%, smaller than the maximum SFLR drawdown of -12.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IFLR and SFLR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IFLR | SFLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.58% | -12.13% | +2.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.79% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -12.13% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.10% | -2.84% | +0.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.72% | -1.75% | -0.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.75% | — |
Volatility
IFLR vs. SFLR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IFLR | SFLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.31% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 7.46% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.52% | 9.68% | +3.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.52% | 10.31% | +3.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.52% | 10.31% | +3.21% |
IFLR vs. SFLR - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both IFLR and SFLR have an expense ratio of 0.89%.
Dividends
IFLR vs. SFLR - Dividend Comparison
IFLR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.28%, less than SFLR's 0.33% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IFLR Innovator International Developed Managed Floor ETF | 0.28% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SFLR Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF | 0.33% | 0.33% | 0.42% | 1.16% | 0.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IFLR and SFLR have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.89% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IFLR and SFLR have the same expense ratio: 0.89% per year.
SFLR has the higher dividend yield at 0.33%, compared with 0.28% for IFLR.
IFLR is categorized as Global Equities, while SFLR is Options Trading.
Find the right allocation for IFLR and SFLR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer