IFLR vs. LOUP
IFLR (Innovator International Developed Managed Floor ETF) and LOUP (Innovator Deepwater Frontier Tech ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IFLR is a Global Equities fund actively managed by Innovator, while LOUP is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Deepwater Frontier Tech Index. IFLR is actively managed, while LOUP is passively managed. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IFLR charges 0.89%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for LOUP.
Performance
IFLR vs. LOUP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IFLR achieves a 5.52% return, which is significantly lower than LOUP's 20.69% return.
IFLR
- 1D
- 0.83%
- 1M
- 0.53%
- YTD
- 5.52%
- 6M
- 5.18%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LOUP
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- 1.32%
- YTD
- 20.69%
- 6M
- 18.47%
- 1Y
- 52.64%
- 3Y*
- 34.58%
- 5Y*
- 11.03%
- 10Y*
- —
IFLR vs. LOUP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
IFLR Innovator International Developed Managed Floor ETF | 5.52% | 3.03% |
LOUP Innovator Deepwater Frontier Tech ETF | 20.69% | 1.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between IFLR and LOUP is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2025 | 0.62 |
IFLR vs. LOUP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IFLR
LOUP
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
-
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
Utilities
Energy
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
IFLR
LOUP
Industrials
IFLR
LOUP
Technology
IFLR
LOUP
Healthcare
IFLR
LOUP
Consumer Cyclical
IFLR
LOUP
Consumer Defensive
IFLR
LOUP
-
Basic Materials
IFLR
LOUP
-
Communication Services
IFLR
LOUP
Utilities
IFLR
LOUP
Energy
IFLR
LOUP
Real Estate
IFLR
LOUP
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IFLR vs. LOUP — Risk / Return Rank
IFLR
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
LOUP
IFLR vs. LOUP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator International Developed Managed Floor ETF (IFLR) and Innovator Deepwater Frontier Tech ETF (LOUP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IFLR | LOUP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.29 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.52 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 8.25 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IFLR vs. LOUP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IFLR drawdown since its inception was -9.58%, smaller than the maximum LOUP drawdown of -58.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IFLR and LOUP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IFLR | LOUP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.58% | -58.68% | +49.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -21.00% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -35.23% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -55.63% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.10% | -7.63% | +5.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.72% | -19.93% | +17.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 6.40% | — |
Volatility
IFLR vs. LOUP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IFLR | LOUP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 11.71% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 23.32% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.52% | 29.74% | -16.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.52% | 32.64% | -19.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.52% | 32.03% | -18.51% |
IFLR vs. LOUP - Expense Ratio Comparison
IFLR has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than LOUP's 0.70% expense ratio.
Dividends
IFLR vs. LOUP - Dividend Comparison
IFLR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.28%, while LOUP has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM |
|---|---|
IFLR Innovator International Developed Managed Floor ETF | 0.28% |
LOUP Innovator Deepwater Frontier Tech ETF | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IFLR and LOUP have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LOUP is cheaper at 0.70% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LOUP is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for IFLR.
IFLR has the higher dividend yield at 0.28%, compared with 0.00% for LOUP.
IFLR is categorized as Global Equities, while LOUP is Technology Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.89% for IFLR and 0.70% for LOUP.
Find the right allocation for IFLR and LOUP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer