IFLR vs. LOUP
IFLR (Innovator International Developed Managed Floor ETF) and LOUP (Innovator Deepwater Frontier Tech ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IFLR is a Global Equities fund actively managed by Innovator, while LOUP is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Deepwater Frontier Tech Index. IFLR is actively managed, while LOUP is passively managed. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IFLR charges 0.89%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for LOUP.
Performance
IFLR vs. LOUP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IFLR achieves a 6.14% return, which is significantly lower than LOUP's 17.46% return.
IFLR
- 1D
- -0.67%
- 1M
- 0.02%
- 6M
- 3.30%
- YTD
- 6.14%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LOUP
- 1D
- -2.46%
- 1M
- -4.18%
- 6M
- 10.42%
- YTD
- 17.46%
- 1Y
- 44.55%
- 3Y*
- 29.70%
- 5Y*
- 12.28%
- 10Y*
- —
IFLR vs. LOUP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
IFLR Innovator International Developed Managed Floor ETF | 6.14% | 3.03% |
LOUP Innovator Deepwater Frontier Tech ETF | 17.46% | 1.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between IFLR and LOUP is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2025 | 0.61 |
IFLR vs. LOUP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IFLR
LOUP
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
-
Basic Materials
-
Utilities
Communication Services
Energy
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
IFLR
LOUP
Industrials
IFLR
LOUP
Technology
IFLR
LOUP
Healthcare
IFLR
LOUP
Consumer Cyclical
IFLR
LOUP
Consumer Defensive
IFLR
LOUP
-
Basic Materials
IFLR
LOUP
-
Utilities
IFLR
LOUP
Communication Services
IFLR
LOUP
Energy
IFLR
LOUP
Real Estate
IFLR
LOUP
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IFLR vs. LOUP — Risk / Return Rank
IFLR
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
LOUP
IFLR vs. LOUP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator International Developed Managed Floor ETF (IFLR) and Innovator Deepwater Frontier Tech ETF (LOUP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IFLR | LOUP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.24 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.13 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 6.84 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IFLR vs. LOUP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IFLR drawdown since its inception was -9.58%, smaller than the maximum LOUP drawdown of -58.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IFLR and LOUP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IFLR | LOUP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.58% | -58.68% | +49.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -21.00% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -35.23% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -55.63% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.52% | -10.10% | +8.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.61% | -19.83% | +17.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 6.53% | — |
Volatility
IFLR vs. LOUP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IFLR | LOUP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 9.42% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 24.24% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.31% | 30.37% | -17.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.31% | 32.76% | -19.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.31% | 32.04% | -18.73% |
IFLR vs. LOUP - Expense Ratio Comparison
IFLR has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than LOUP's 0.70% expense ratio.
Dividends
IFLR vs. LOUP - Dividend Comparison
IFLR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.95%, while LOUP has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM |
|---|---|
IFLR Innovator International Developed Managed Floor ETF | 0.95% |
LOUP Innovator Deepwater Frontier Tech ETF | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IFLR and LOUP have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LOUP is cheaper at 0.70% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LOUP is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for IFLR.
IFLR has the higher dividend yield at 0.95%, compared with 0.00% for LOUP.
IFLR is categorized as Global Equities, while LOUP is Technology Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.89% for IFLR and 0.70% for LOUP.
Find the right allocation for IFLR and LOUP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer