PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IFLR vs. AVGV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IFLR vs. AVGV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator International Developed Managed Floor ETF (IFLR) and Avantis ALL Equity Markets Value ETF (AVGV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IFLR achieves a 4.93% return, which is significantly lower than AVGV's 16.99% return.


IFLR

1D
-0.55%
1M
3.67%
YTD
4.93%
6M
7.25%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AVGV

1D
-0.48%
1M
4.06%
YTD
16.99%
6M
18.62%
1Y
36.52%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IFLR vs. AVGV - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between IFLR and AVGV is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2025

0.82

IFLR vs. AVGV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IFLR
AVGV

Financial Services

21.1%
21.6%

Industrials

17.4%
16.1%

Technology

11.4%
10.5%

Healthcare

9.6%
4.5%

Consumer Cyclical

7.3%
14.5%

Consumer Defensive

6.6%
5.5%

Basic Materials

5.7%
7.3%

Communication Services

3.9%
4.9%

Energy

3.7%
13.6%

Utilities

3.6%
0.7%

Real Estate

1.7%
0.8%

Financial Services

IFLR
21.1%
AVGV
21.6%

Industrials

IFLR
17.4%
AVGV
16.1%

Technology

IFLR
11.4%
AVGV
10.5%

Healthcare

IFLR
9.6%
AVGV
4.5%

Consumer Cyclical

IFLR
7.3%
AVGV
14.5%

Consumer Defensive

IFLR
6.6%
AVGV
5.5%

Basic Materials

IFLR
5.7%
AVGV
7.3%

Communication Services

IFLR
3.9%
AVGV
4.9%

Energy

IFLR
3.7%
AVGV
13.6%

Utilities

IFLR
3.6%
AVGV
0.7%

Real Estate

IFLR
1.7%
AVGV
0.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IFLR vs. AVGV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IFLR

AVGV
AVGV Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
AVGV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVGV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVGV Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
AVGV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVGV Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IFLR vs. AVGV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator International Developed Managed Floor ETF (IFLR) and Avantis ALL Equity Markets Value ETF (AVGV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

IFLR vs. AVGV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IFLRAVGVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.84

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.43

1.46

-0.03

Drawdowns

IFLR vs. AVGV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IFLR drawdown since its inception was -9.58%, smaller than the maximum AVGV drawdown of -17.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IFLR and AVGV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IFLRAVGVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.58%

-17.03%

+7.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.65%

-0.48%

-2.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.75%

-2.30%

-0.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.07%

Volatility

IFLR vs. AVGV - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IFLRAVGVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.07%

12.94%

+0.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.07%

14.97%

-1.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.07%

14.97%

-1.90%

IFLR vs. AVGV - Expense Ratio Comparison

IFLR has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than AVGV's 0.26% expense ratio.


Dividends

IFLR vs. AVGV - Dividend Comparison

IFLR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.28%, less than AVGV's 1.89% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
AVGV
Avantis ALL Equity Markets Value ETF
1.89%1.98%2.32%1.14%
IFLR
Innovator International Developed Managed Floor ETF
0.28%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IFLR and AVGV have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, AVGV is cheaper at 0.26% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AVGV is cheaper with a 0.26% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for IFLR.

AVGV has the higher dividend yield at 1.89%, compared with 0.28% for IFLR.

They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Avantis. Their fees differ too: 0.89% for IFLR and 0.26% for AVGV.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IFLR and AVGV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer