PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IFLO vs. JIVE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IFLO vs. JIVE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF (IFLO) and JPMorgan International Value ETF (JIVE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IFLO achieves a 18.32% return, which is significantly higher than JIVE's 15.36% return.


IFLO

1D
-0.65%
1M
-0.87%
6M
14.97%
YTD
18.32%
1Y
31.49%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

JIVE

1D
-0.85%
1M
-1.06%
6M
11.81%
YTD
15.36%
1Y
36.88%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IFLO vs. JIVE - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between IFLO and JIVE is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025

0.87

The correlation between IFLO and JIVE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

IFLO vs. JIVE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IFLO
JIVE

Technology

21.5%
11.7%

Industrials

18.1%
10.2%

Consumer Cyclical

13.8%
6.2%

Energy

12.1%
10.7%

Healthcare

11.7%
4.5%

Basic Materials

11.3%
5.7%

Communication Services

6.7%
4.2%

Consumer Defensive

2.8%
4.3%

Financial Services

1.1%
37.6%

Utilities

1.0%
2.4%

Real Estate

0.0%
2.4%

Technology

IFLO
21.5%
JIVE
11.7%

Industrials

IFLO
18.1%
JIVE
10.2%

Consumer Cyclical

IFLO
13.8%
JIVE
6.2%

Energy

IFLO
12.1%
JIVE
10.7%

Healthcare

IFLO
11.7%
JIVE
4.5%

Basic Materials

IFLO
11.3%
JIVE
5.7%

Communication Services

IFLO
6.7%
JIVE
4.2%

Consumer Defensive

IFLO
2.8%
JIVE
4.3%

Financial Services

IFLO
1.1%
JIVE
37.6%

Utilities

IFLO
1.0%
JIVE
2.4%

Real Estate

IFLO
0.0%
JIVE
2.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IFLO vs. JIVE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IFLO
IFLO Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
IFLO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IFLO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
IFLO Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
IFLO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
IFLO Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

JIVE
JIVE Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
JIVE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JIVE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
JIVE Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
JIVE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
JIVE Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IFLO vs. JIVE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF (IFLO) and JPMorgan International Value ETF (JIVE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IFLOJIVEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.44

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.91

3.51

+1.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.50

13.18

+3.33

IFLO vs. JIVE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IFLO Sharpe Ratio is 2.16, which is comparable to the JIVE Sharpe Ratio of 2.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IFLO and JIVE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IFLO vs. JIVE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IFLO drawdown since its inception was -6.44%, smaller than the maximum JIVE drawdown of -13.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IFLO and JIVE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IFLOJIVEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.44%

-13.79%

+7.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.44%

-10.57%

+4.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.22%

-2.06%

-0.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.29%

-1.95%

+0.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.91%

2.81%

-0.90%

Volatility

IFLO vs. JIVE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF (IFLO) is 4.77%, while JPMorgan International Value ETF (JIVE) has a volatility of 5.03%. This indicates that IFLO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JIVE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IFLOJIVEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.77%

5.03%

-0.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.05%

13.13%

-1.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.71%

15.17%

-0.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.61%

15.10%

-0.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.61%

15.10%

-0.49%

IFLO vs. JIVE - Expense Ratio Comparison

IFLO has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is higher than JIVE's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

IFLO vs. JIVE - Dividend Comparison

IFLO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.57%, less than JIVE's 2.49% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
IFLO
VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF
1.57%0.73%0.00%0.00%
JIVE
JPMorgan International Value ETF
2.49%2.88%2.48%0.74%

Frequently Asked Questions


IFLO and JIVE have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JIVE has higher volatility (5.03%) compared to IFLO (4.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IFLO dropped -6.44% vs JIVE's -13.79%.

On 1-year performance, JIVE leads with 36.88% vs 31.49% for IFLO. On fees, JIVE is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, IFLO has been the lower-risk option at 4.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, JIVE has performed better with a 36.88% return vs 31.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

JIVE is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.56% for IFLO.

JIVE has the higher dividend yield at 2.49%, compared with 1.57% for IFLO.

They also come from different issuers: VictoryShares and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.56% for IFLO and 0.55% for JIVE.

JIVE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.45 vs 2.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IFLO and JIVE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer