IFLO vs. FID
IFLO (VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF) and FID (First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. Over the past year, IFLO returned 33.19% vs 19.62% for FID. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IFLO charges 0.56%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for FID.
Performance
IFLO vs. FID - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IFLO achieves a 18.60% return, which is significantly higher than FID's 9.76% return.
IFLO
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- -1.46%
- 6M
- 15.69%
- YTD
- 18.60%
- 1Y
- 33.19%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FID
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- 0.63%
- 6M
- 7.95%
- YTD
- 9.76%
- 1Y
- 19.62%
- 3Y*
- 17.26%
- 5Y*
- 8.75%
- 10Y*
- —
IFLO vs. FID - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
IFLO VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF | 18.60% | 13.12% |
FID First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 9.76% | 11.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between IFLO and FID is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025 | 0.75 |
The correlation between IFLO and FID has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.
IFLO vs. FID - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IFLO
FID
Technology
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Financial Services
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
IFLO
FID
Industrials
IFLO
FID
Consumer Cyclical
IFLO
FID
Energy
IFLO
FID
Healthcare
IFLO
FID
Basic Materials
IFLO
FID
Communication Services
IFLO
FID
Consumer Defensive
IFLO
FID
Financial Services
IFLO
FID
Utilities
IFLO
FID
Real Estate
IFLO
FID
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IFLO vs. FID — Risk / Return Rank
IFLO
FID
IFLO vs. FID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF (IFLO) and First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF (FID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IFLO | FID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.60 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.35 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.18 | 2.21 | +2.97 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.40 | 7.42 | +9.98 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IFLO vs. FID - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IFLO drawdown since its inception was -6.44%, smaller than the maximum FID drawdown of -39.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IFLO and FID.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IFLO | FID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.44% | -39.79% | +33.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.44% | -8.93% | +2.49% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -10.97% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -29.13% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.99% | -0.18% | -1.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.29% | -8.37% | +7.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.91% | 2.65% | -0.74% |
Volatility
IFLO vs. FID - Volatility Comparison
VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF (IFLO) has a higher volatility of 3.21% compared to First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF (FID) at 2.83%. This indicates that IFLO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FID based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IFLO | FID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.21% | 2.83% | +0.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.02% | 8.65% | +3.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.56% | 10.14% | +4.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.53% | 17.05% | -2.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.53% | 18.86% | -4.33% |
IFLO vs. FID - Expense Ratio Comparison
IFLO has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is lower than FID's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
IFLO vs. FID - Dividend Comparison
IFLO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.57%, less than FID's 4.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FID First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 4.13% | 4.30% | 4.31% | 4.19% | 4.22% | 3.76% | 3.91% | 3.70% | 1.74% |
IFLO VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF | 1.57% | 0.73% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IFLO and FID have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IFLO has higher volatility (3.21%) compared to FID (2.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IFLO dropped -6.44% vs FID's -39.79%.
On 1-year performance, IFLO leads with 33.19% vs 19.62% for FID. On fees, IFLO is cheaper at 0.56% per year. On volatility, FID has been the lower-risk option at 2.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, IFLO has performed better with a 33.19% return vs 19.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IFLO is cheaper with a 0.56% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for FID.
FID has the higher dividend yield at 4.13%, compared with 1.57% for IFLO.
They also come from different issuers: VictoryShares and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.56% for IFLO and 0.60% for FID.
IFLO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 1.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IFLO and FID
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer