IFGL vs. IBIT
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares International Developed Real Estate ETF (IFGL) and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT).
IFGL and IBIT are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IFGL is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed Real Estate ex-U.S. Index. It was launched on Nov 12, 2007. IBIT is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. It was launched on Jan 5, 2024. Both IFGL and IBIT are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
IFGL vs. IBIT - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
IFGL vs. IBIT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
IFGL iShares International Developed Real Estate ETF | -2.67% | 24.31% | -5.02% |
IBIT iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF | -22.62% | -6.41% | 99.21% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IFGL achieves a -2.67% return, which is significantly higher than IBIT's -22.62% return.
IFGL
- 1D
- 2.48%
- 1M
- -12.00%
- YTD
- -2.67%
- 6M
- -1.05%
- 1Y
- 17.76%
- 3Y*
- 6.31%
- 5Y*
- -1.19%
- 10Y*
- 1.66%
IBIT
- 1D
- 1.96%
- 1M
- 3.31%
- YTD
- -22.62%
- 6M
- -40.89%
- 1Y
- -17.92%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IFGL vs. IBIT - Expense Ratio Comparison
IFGL has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is higher than IBIT's 0.25% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
IFGL vs. IBIT — Risk / Return Rank
IFGL
IBIT
IFGL vs. IBIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares International Developed Real Estate ETF (IFGL) and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IFGL | IBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.24 | -0.40 | +1.64 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.76 | -0.29 | +2.05 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 0.97 | +0.27 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.17 | -0.39 | +1.56 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.14 | -0.83 | +5.97 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IFGL | IBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.24 | -0.40 | +1.64 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.07 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.10 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.04 | 0.35 | -0.31 |
Correlation
The correlation between IFGL and IBIT is 0.24, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
IFGL vs. IBIT - Dividend Comparison
IFGL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.92%, while IBIT has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IFGL iShares International Developed Real Estate ETF | 3.92% | 3.71% | 4.83% | 1.82% | 2.79% | 3.25% | 2.17% | 7.60% | 4.10% | 4.90% | 7.68% | 3.70% |
IBIT iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
IFGL vs. IBIT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IFGL drawdown since its inception was -67.94%, which is greater than IBIT's maximum drawdown of -49.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IFGL and IBIT.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| IFGL | IBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.94% | -49.36% | -18.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.38% | -49.36% | +34.98% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.47% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.38% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.36% | -46.11% | +30.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.73% | -14.13% | -2.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.28% | 23.09% | -19.81% |
Volatility
IFGL vs. IBIT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares International Developed Real Estate ETF (IFGL) is 6.49%, while iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT) has a volatility of 12.99%. This indicates that IFGL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| IFGL | IBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.49% | 12.99% | -6.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.61% | 36.75% | -27.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.41% | 45.42% | -31.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.16% | 51.26% | -35.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.49% | 51.26% | -34.77% |