IFGL vs. IBIT
IFGL (iShares International Developed Real Estate ETF) and IBIT (iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IFGL is a REIT fund tracking the FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed Real Estate ex-U.S. Index, while IBIT is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, IFGL returned 6.13% vs -38.74% for IBIT. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IFGL charges 0.48%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for IBIT.
Performance
IFGL vs. IBIT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IFGL achieves a -2.19% return, which is significantly higher than IBIT's -25.48% return.
IFGL
- 1D
- -1.17%
- 1M
- -4.06%
- YTD
- -2.19%
- 6M
- -0.58%
- 1Y
- 6.13%
- 3Y*
- 6.59%
- 5Y*
- -2.66%
- 10Y*
- 1.41%
IBIT
- 1D
- -2.76%
- 1M
- -18.50%
- YTD
- -25.48%
- 6M
- -29.84%
- 1Y
- -38.74%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IFGL vs. IBIT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
IFGL iShares International Developed Real Estate ETF | -2.19% | 24.31% | -5.02% |
IBIT iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF | -25.48% | -6.41% | 99.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between IFGL and IBIT is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2024 | 0.26 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IFGL vs. IBIT — Risk / Return Rank
IFGL
IBIT
IFGL vs. IBIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares International Developed Real Estate ETF (IFGL) and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IFGL | IBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.96 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 0.86 | +0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.43 | -0.79 | +1.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.32 | -1.36 | +2.68 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IFGL | IBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 | -0.89 | +1.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.16 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.09 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.04 | 0.30 | -0.26 |
Drawdowns
IFGL vs. IBIT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IFGL drawdown since its inception was -67.94%, which is greater than IBIT's maximum drawdown of -49.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IFGL and IBIT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IFGL | IBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.94% | -49.36% | -18.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.38% | -49.36% | +34.98% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.77% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.47% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.38% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.94% | -48.10% | +33.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.68% | -16.02% | -0.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.65% | 28.44% | -23.79% |
Volatility
IFGL vs. IBIT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares International Developed Real Estate ETF (IFGL) is 4.54%, while iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT) has a volatility of 9.50%. This indicates that IFGL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IFGL | IBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.54% | 9.50% | -4.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.46% | 34.44% | -22.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.68% | 43.73% | -30.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.38% | 50.19% | -33.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.59% | 50.19% | -33.60% |
IFGL vs. IBIT - Expense Ratio Comparison
IFGL has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is higher than IBIT's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
IFGL vs. IBIT - Dividend Comparison
IFGL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.90%, while IBIT has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBIT iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IFGL iShares International Developed Real Estate ETF | 3.90% | 3.71% | 4.83% | 1.82% | 2.79% | 3.25% | 2.17% | 7.60% | 4.10% | 4.90% | 7.68% | 3.70% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IFGL and IBIT have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IBIT has higher volatility (9.50%) compared to IFGL (4.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IFGL dropped -67.94% vs IBIT's -49.36%.
On 1-year performance, IFGL leads with 6.13% vs -38.74% for IBIT. On fees, IBIT is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, IFGL has been the lower-risk option at 4.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, IFGL has performed better with a 6.13% return vs -38.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IBIT is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for IFGL.
IFGL has the higher dividend yield at 3.90%, compared with 0.00% for IBIT.
IFGL is categorized as REIT, while IBIT is Cryptocurrency. IFGL tracks FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed Real Estate ex-U.S. Index, while IBIT tracks CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. Their fees differ too: 0.48% for IFGL and 0.25% for IBIT.
IFGL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.45 vs -0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IFGL and IBIT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer