IFEB vs. XUSP

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

IFEB (Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - February) and XUSP (Innovator Uncapped Accelerated U.S. Equity ETF) are both Options Trading funds from Innovator. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, IFEB returned 10.26% vs 33.74% for XUSP. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IFEB charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for XUSP.

Performance

IFEB vs. XUSP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - February (IFEB) and Innovator Uncapped Accelerated U.S. Equity ETF (XUSP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IFEB achieves a 2.84% return, which is significantly lower than XUSP's 12.67% return.

IFEB

• 1D: -0.28%
• 1M: 1.98%
• YTD: 2.84%
• 6M: 3.95%
• 1Y: 10.26%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

XUSP

• 1D: -0.86%
• 1M: 7.03%
• YTD: 12.67%
• 6M: 12.12%
• 1Y: 33.74%
• 3Y*: 25.24%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IFEB vs. XUSP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
IFEB Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - February	2.84%	19.46%	0.54%
XUSP Innovator Uncapped Accelerated U.S. Equity ETF	12.67%	18.27%	26.53%

Correlation

The correlation between IFEB and XUSP is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.72
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2024	0.67

The correlation between IFEB and XUSP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

IFEB vs. XUSP - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IFEB	XUSP
Financial Services	24.7%	11.9%
Industrials	19.8%	8.1%
Healthcare	10.6%	8.4%
Technology	10.3%	36.2%
Consumer Cyclical	7.7%	10.1%
Consumer Defensive	6.7%	4.9%
Basic Materials	5.9%	1.8%
Communication Services	4.5%	10.9%
Energy	4.0%	3.5%
Utilities	4.0%	2.3%
Real Estate	1.9%	1.9%

Return for Risk

IFEB vs. XUSP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IFEB

IFEB Risk / Return Rank: 39
IFEB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
IFEB Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
IFEB Omega Ratio Rank: 45
IFEB Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
IFEB Martin Ratio Rank: 41

XUSP

XUSP Risk / Return Rank: 62
XUSP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
XUSP Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
XUSP Omega Ratio Rank: 61
XUSP Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
XUSP Martin Ratio Rank: 65

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IFEB vs. XUSP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - February (IFEB) and Innovator Uncapped Accelerated U.S. Equity ETF (XUSP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IFEB	XUSP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.37	2.13	-0.77
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.99	2.87	-0.88
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.37	-0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.59	2.80	-1.20
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.51	11.82	-5.31
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IFEB vs. XUSP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IFEB Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is lower than the XUSP Sharpe Ratio of 2.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IFEB and XUSP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IFEB	XUSP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.37	2.13	-0.77
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.05	1.04	0.00

Drawdowns

IFEB vs. XUSP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IFEB drawdown since its inception was -8.84%, smaller than the maximum XUSP drawdown of -22.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IFEB and XUSP.

Drawdown Indicators

	IFEB	XUSP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-8.84%	-22.59%	+13.75%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.47%	-12.13%	+5.66%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-22.59%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.41%	-0.86%	+0.45%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.68%	-4.42%	+2.74%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.58%	2.86%	-1.28%

Volatility

IFEB vs. XUSP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - February (IFEB) is 2.58%, while Innovator Uncapped Accelerated U.S. Equity ETF (XUSP) has a volatility of 4.13%. This indicates that IFEB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XUSP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IFEB	XUSP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.58%	4.13%	-1.55%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.52%	11.89%	-5.37%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.55%	15.90%	-8.35%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.09%	19.21%	-10.12%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.09%	19.21%	-10.12%

IFEB vs. XUSP - Expense Ratio Comparison

IFEB has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than XUSP's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

IFEB vs. XUSP - Dividend Comparison

Neither IFEB nor XUSP has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IFEB and XUSP in my portfolio?

IFEB and XUSP have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IFEB or XUSP?

XUSP has higher volatility (4.13%) compared to IFEB (2.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IFEB dropped -8.84% vs XUSP's -22.59%.

Which ETF is better, IFEB or XUSP?

On 1-year performance, XUSP leads with 33.74% vs 10.26% for IFEB. On fees, XUSP is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, IFEB has been the lower-risk option at 2.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IFEB or XUSP?

Over the 1-year period, XUSP has performed better with a 33.74% return vs 10.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IFEB or XUSP?

XUSP is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for IFEB.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IFEB or XUSP?

IFEB and XUSP have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between IFEB and XUSP?

Their fees differ too: 0.85% for IFEB and 0.79% for XUSP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XUSP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.