IEVAX vs. GIDGX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

IEVAX (Columbia Global Value Fund) and GIDGX (Goldman Sachs Enhanced Dividend Global Equity Portfolio) are both Global Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, IEVAX returned 10.54%/yr vs 10.55%/yr for GIDGX. Their correlation of 0.91 means they have usually moved in the same direction. IEVAX charges 1.13%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for GIDGX.

Performance

IEVAX vs. GIDGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Global Value Fund (IEVAX) and Goldman Sachs Enhanced Dividend Global Equity Portfolio (GIDGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with IEVAX having a 11.01% return and GIDGX slightly higher at 11.35%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IEVAX having a 10.54% annualized return and GIDGX not far ahead at 10.55%.

IEVAX

• 1D: 2.37%
• 1M: 1.21%
• 6M: 6.87%
• YTD: 11.01%
• 1Y: 20.23%
• 3Y*: 15.80%
• 5Y*: 10.22%
• 10Y*: 10.54%
• ALL TIME*: 8.33%

GIDGX

• 1D: 1.42%
• 1M: -0.24%
• 6M: 8.57%
• YTD: 11.35%
• 1Y: 21.53%
• 3Y*: 17.10%
• 5Y*: 10.81%
• 10Y*: 10.55%
• ALL TIME*: 10.23%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
GIDGX Goldman Sachs Enhanced Dividend Global Equity Portfolio	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
IEVAX Columbia Global Value Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

IEVAX vs. GIDGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
IEVAX Columbia Global Value Fund	11.01%	21.42%	11.78%	12.00%	-8.52%	20.31%	3.77%	24.55%	-12.22%	21.93%
GIDGX Goldman Sachs Enhanced Dividend Global Equity Portfolio	11.35%	15.74%	20.59%	17.92%	-12.75%	18.46%	8.41%	19.97%	-8.26%	15.18%

Correlation

The correlation between IEVAX and GIDGX is 0.85, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.85
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.84
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.87
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.88
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2009	0.91

The correlation between IEVAX and GIDGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

IEVAX vs. GIDGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

IEVAX

IEVAX Risk / Return Rank: 72
IEVAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
IEVAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
IEVAX Omega Ratio Rank: 71
IEVAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
IEVAX Martin Ratio Rank: 77

GIDGX

GIDGX Risk / Return Rank: 82
GIDGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
GIDGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
GIDGX Omega Ratio Rank: 78
GIDGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
GIDGX Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

IEVAX vs. GIDGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Global Value Fund (IEVAX) and Goldman Sachs Enhanced Dividend Global Equity Portfolio (GIDGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IEVAX	GIDGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.75	1.91	-0.16
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.58	2.70	-0.13
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.36	-0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.26	2.80	-0.55
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.74	13.05	-3.31

IEVAX vs. GIDGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IEVAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.75, which is comparable to the GIDGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IEVAX and GIDGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

IEVAX vs. GIDGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IEVAX drawdown since its inception was -56.85%, which is greater than GIDGX's maximum drawdown of -31.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IEVAX and GIDGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	IEVAX	GIDGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-56.85%	-31.63%	-25.22%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.80%	-7.14%	-1.66%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.12%	-14.69%	+0.57%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.58%	-20.39%	-0.19%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-37.88%	-31.63%	-6.25%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.91%	+0.91%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.42%	-3.84%	-4.58%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.04%	1.53%	+0.51%

Volatility

IEVAX vs. GIDGX - Volatility Comparison

Columbia Global Value Fund (IEVAX) has a higher volatility of 3.83% compared to Goldman Sachs Enhanced Dividend Global Equity Portfolio (GIDGX) at 2.91%. This indicates that IEVAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GIDGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IEVAX	GIDGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.83%	2.91%	+0.92%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.42%	8.58%	+0.84%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.37%	10.47%	+0.90%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.11%	13.07%	+1.04%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.45%	14.11%	+2.34%

IEVAX vs. GIDGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

IEVAX has a 1.13% expense ratio, which is higher than GIDGX's 0.17% expense ratio.

Dividends

IEVAX vs. GIDGX - Dividend Comparison

IEVAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.01%, more than GIDGX's 5.52% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GIDGX Goldman Sachs Enhanced Dividend Global Equity Portfolio	5.52%	5.92%	12.06%	4.32%	8.89%	8.41%	1.99%	4.85%	5.67%	3.35%	2.97%	3.21%
IEVAX Columbia Global Value Fund	12.01%	10.06%	10.32%	6.26%	7.61%	11.24%	8.76%	9.16%	6.75%	1.66%	2.28%	4.68%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IEVAX and GIDGX in my portfolio?

IEVAX and GIDGX have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IEVAX or GIDGX?

IEVAX has higher volatility (3.83%) compared to GIDGX (2.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IEVAX dropped -56.85% vs GIDGX's -31.63%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GIDGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs 1.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.