PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IEV vs. EWN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IEV vs. EWN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Europe ETF (IEV) and iShares MSCI Netherlands ETF (EWN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IEV achieves a 6.59% return, which is significantly lower than EWN's 19.59% return. Over the past 10 years, IEV has underperformed EWN with an annualized return of 9.15%, while EWN has yielded a comparatively higher 12.93% annualized return.


IEV

1D
1.15%
1M
2.48%
YTD
6.59%
6M
9.69%
1Y
18.09%
3Y*
16.65%
5Y*
8.80%
10Y*
9.15%

EWN

1D
1.27%
1M
7.50%
YTD
19.59%
6M
20.46%
1Y
34.80%
3Y*
20.61%
5Y*
8.97%
10Y*
12.93%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IEV vs. EWN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IEV
iShares Europe ETF
6.59%35.63%1.36%20.14%-14.24%16.73%4.07%24.03%-14.68%24.84%
EWN
iShares MSCI Netherlands ETF
19.59%34.87%1.67%22.08%-24.43%22.74%23.23%32.45%-15.37%33.73%

Correlation

The correlation between IEV and EWN is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2000

0.85

The correlation between IEV and EWN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

IEV vs. EWN - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IEV
EWN

Financial Services

23.9%
18.1%

Industrials

19.3%
10.2%

Healthcare

13.1%
2.6%

Technology

8.7%
34.8%

Consumer Defensive

8.3%
11.5%

Consumer Cyclical

6.7%
1.5%

Basic Materials

5.7%
3.1%

Energy

5.6%
2.1%

Utilities

5.0%

-

Communication Services

2.9%
14.7%

Real Estate

0.8%
0.7%

Financial Services

IEV
23.9%
EWN
18.1%

Industrials

IEV
19.3%
EWN
10.2%

Healthcare

IEV
13.1%
EWN
2.6%

Technology

IEV
8.7%
EWN
34.8%

Consumer Defensive

IEV
8.3%
EWN
11.5%

Consumer Cyclical

IEV
6.7%
EWN
1.5%

Basic Materials

IEV
5.7%
EWN
3.1%

Energy

IEV
5.6%
EWN
2.1%

Utilities

IEV
5.0%
EWN

-

Communication Services

IEV
2.9%
EWN
14.7%

Real Estate

IEV
0.8%
EWN
0.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IEV vs. EWN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IEV
IEV Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
IEV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IEV Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
IEV Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
IEV Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
IEV Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

EWN
EWN Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
EWN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EWN Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
EWN Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
EWN Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
EWN Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IEV vs. EWN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Europe ETF (IEV) and iShares MSCI Netherlands ETF (EWN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IEVEWNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.61

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.83

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.30

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.48

2.64

-1.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.40

9.98

-4.59

IEV vs. EWN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IEV Sharpe Ratio is 1.16, which is lower than the EWN Sharpe Ratio of 1.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IEV and EWN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IEVEWNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.16

1.78

-0.61

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

0.39

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

0.61

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.24

0.31

-0.07

Drawdowns

IEV vs. EWN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IEV drawdown since its inception was -63.27%, roughly equal to the maximum EWN drawdown of -65.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IEV and EWN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IEVEWNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.27%

-65.22%

+1.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.31%

-13.24%

+0.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.63%

-19.77%

+5.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.60%

-43.57%

+12.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.62%

-43.57%

+6.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.65%

-0.04%

-1.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.04%

-16.35%

+1.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.36%

3.49%

-0.13%

Volatility

IEV vs. EWN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Europe ETF (IEV) is 5.56%, while iShares MSCI Netherlands ETF (EWN) has a volatility of 7.31%. This indicates that IEV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EWN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IEVEWNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.56%

7.31%

-1.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.99%

16.41%

-3.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.62%

19.70%

-4.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.58%

22.89%

-5.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.66%

21.36%

-2.70%

IEV vs. EWN - Expense Ratio Comparison

IEV has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than EWN's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

IEV vs. EWN - Dividend Comparison

IEV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.56%, less than EWN's 4.21% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EWN
iShares MSCI Netherlands ETF
4.21%5.03%2.18%1.79%1.98%1.01%0.78%2.57%2.40%1.68%2.71%1.92%
IEV
iShares Europe ETF
2.56%2.73%3.10%2.77%3.06%2.81%1.76%3.06%3.43%2.39%3.08%2.81%

Frequently Asked Questions


IEV and EWN have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EWN has higher volatility (7.31%) compared to IEV (5.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IEV dropped -63.27% vs EWN's -65.22%.

On 10-year performance, EWN leads with 12.93% vs 9.15% for IEV. On fees, EWN is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, IEV has been the lower-risk option at 5.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, EWN has performed better with a 12.93% return vs 9.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EWN is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for IEV.

EWN has the higher dividend yield at 4.21%, compared with 2.56% for IEV.

IEV tracks S&P Europe 350 Index, while EWN tracks MSCI Netherlands Investable Market Index. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for IEV and 0.50% for EWN.

EWN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.78 vs 1.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IEV and EWN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer