PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IEV vs. EZU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IEV vs. EZU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Europe ETF (IEV) and iShares MSCI Eurozone ETF (EZU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IEV achieves a 6.72% return, which is significantly lower than EZU's 8.17% return. Over the past 10 years, IEV has underperformed EZU with an annualized return of 9.20%, while EZU has yielded a comparatively higher 9.96% annualized return.


IEV

1D
0.63%
1M
2.18%
YTD
6.72%
6M
10.40%
1Y
18.07%
3Y*
16.39%
5Y*
9.00%
10Y*
9.20%

EZU

1D
0.73%
1M
3.97%
YTD
8.17%
6M
11.21%
1Y
19.95%
3Y*
18.60%
5Y*
9.36%
10Y*
9.96%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IEV vs. EZU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IEV
iShares Europe ETF
6.72%35.63%1.36%20.14%-14.24%16.73%4.07%24.03%-14.68%24.84%
EZU
iShares MSCI Eurozone ETF
8.17%40.00%2.23%23.44%-17.25%13.92%7.62%23.27%-16.76%27.89%

Correlation

The correlation between IEV and EZU is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2001

0.95

The correlation between IEV and EZU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

IEV vs. EZU - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IEV
EZU

Financial Services

23.9%
24.2%

Industrials

19.3%
21.3%

Healthcare

13.1%
5.8%

Technology

8.7%
14.6%

Consumer Defensive

8.3%
5.6%

Consumer Cyclical

6.7%
8.3%

Basic Materials

5.7%
4.1%

Energy

5.6%
4.2%

Utilities

5.0%
6.8%

Communication Services

2.9%
4.1%

Real Estate

0.8%
1.0%

Financial Services

IEV
23.9%
EZU
24.2%

Industrials

IEV
19.3%
EZU
21.3%

Healthcare

IEV
13.1%
EZU
5.8%

Technology

IEV
8.7%
EZU
14.6%

Consumer Defensive

IEV
8.3%
EZU
5.6%

Consumer Cyclical

IEV
6.7%
EZU
8.3%

Basic Materials

IEV
5.7%
EZU
4.1%

Energy

IEV
5.6%
EZU
4.2%

Utilities

IEV
5.0%
EZU
6.8%

Communication Services

IEV
2.9%
EZU
4.1%

Real Estate

IEV
0.8%
EZU
1.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IEV vs. EZU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IEV
IEV Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
IEV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IEV Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
IEV Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
IEV Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
IEV Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

EZU
EZU Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
EZU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EZU Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
EZU Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
EZU Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
EZU Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IEV vs. EZU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Europe ETF (IEV) and iShares MSCI Eurozone ETF (EZU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IEVEZUDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.17

1.19

-0.02

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.71

1.75

-0.04

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.22

-0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.55

1.62

-0.07

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.70

5.88

-0.18

IEV vs. EZU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IEV Sharpe Ratio is 1.17, which is comparable to the EZU Sharpe Ratio of 1.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IEV and EZU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IEVEZUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.17

1.19

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

0.47

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

0.49

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.24

0.21

+0.03

Drawdowns

IEV vs. EZU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IEV drawdown since its inception was -63.27%, roughly equal to the maximum EZU drawdown of -65.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IEV and EZU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IEVEZUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.27%

-65.32%

+2.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.31%

-13.06%

+0.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.63%

-15.02%

+0.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.60%

-36.11%

+5.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.62%

-41.37%

+4.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.53%

0.00%

-1.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.05%

-19.24%

+4.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.35%

3.60%

-0.25%

Volatility

IEV vs. EZU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Europe ETF (IEV) is 5.77%, while iShares MSCI Eurozone ETF (EZU) has a volatility of 6.82%. This indicates that IEV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EZU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IEVEZUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.77%

6.82%

-1.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.89%

14.07%

-1.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.58%

16.89%

-1.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.56%

19.85%

-2.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.66%

20.49%

-1.83%

IEV vs. EZU - Expense Ratio Comparison

IEV has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than EZU's 0.51% expense ratio.


Dividends

IEV vs. EZU - Dividend Comparison

IEV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.56%, less than EZU's 2.64% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EZU
iShares MSCI Eurozone ETF
2.64%2.85%2.90%2.56%2.79%2.46%2.13%2.84%3.47%1.91%3.07%2.18%
IEV
iShares Europe ETF
2.56%2.73%3.10%2.77%3.06%2.81%1.76%3.06%3.43%2.39%3.08%2.81%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, IEV and EZU move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

EZU has higher volatility (6.82%) compared to IEV (5.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IEV dropped -63.27% vs EZU's -65.32%.

On 10-year performance, EZU leads with 9.96% vs 9.20% for IEV. On fees, EZU is cheaper at 0.51% per year. On volatility, IEV has been the lower-risk option at 5.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, EZU has performed better with a 9.96% return vs 9.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EZU is cheaper with a 0.51% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for IEV.

EZU has the higher dividend yield at 2.64%, compared with 2.56% for IEV.

IEV tracks S&P Europe 350 Index, while EZU tracks MSCI EMU. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for IEV and 0.51% for EZU.

EZU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.19 vs 1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IEV and EZU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer