IEV vs. EZU
IEV (iShares Europe ETF) and EZU (iShares MSCI Eurozone ETF) are both Europe Equities funds from iShares - IEV tracks the S&P Europe 350 Index while EZU tracks the MSCI EMU. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IEV returned 9.20%/yr vs 9.96%/yr for EZU. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IEV charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.51%/yr for EZU.
Performance
IEV vs. EZU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IEV achieves a 6.72% return, which is significantly lower than EZU's 8.17% return. Over the past 10 years, IEV has underperformed EZU with an annualized return of 9.20%, while EZU has yielded a comparatively higher 9.96% annualized return.
IEV
- 1D
- 0.63%
- 1M
- 2.18%
- YTD
- 6.72%
- 6M
- 10.40%
- 1Y
- 18.07%
- 3Y*
- 16.39%
- 5Y*
- 9.00%
- 10Y*
- 9.20%
EZU
- 1D
- 0.73%
- 1M
- 3.97%
- YTD
- 8.17%
- 6M
- 11.21%
- 1Y
- 19.95%
- 3Y*
- 18.60%
- 5Y*
- 9.36%
- 10Y*
- 9.96%
IEV vs. EZU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IEV iShares Europe ETF | 6.72% | 35.63% | 1.36% | 20.14% | -14.24% | 16.73% | 4.07% | 24.03% | -14.68% | 24.84% |
EZU iShares MSCI Eurozone ETF | 8.17% | 40.00% | 2.23% | 23.44% | -17.25% | 13.92% | 7.62% | 23.27% | -16.76% | 27.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between IEV and EZU is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2001 | 0.95 |
The correlation between IEV and EZU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.
IEV vs. EZU - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IEV
EZU
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Technology
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Energy
Utilities
Communication Services
Real Estate
Financial Services
IEV
EZU
Industrials
IEV
EZU
Healthcare
IEV
EZU
Technology
IEV
EZU
Consumer Defensive
IEV
EZU
Consumer Cyclical
IEV
EZU
Basic Materials
IEV
EZU
Energy
IEV
EZU
Utilities
IEV
EZU
Communication Services
IEV
EZU
Real Estate
IEV
EZU
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IEV vs. EZU — Risk / Return Rank
IEV
EZU
IEV vs. EZU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Europe ETF (IEV) and iShares MSCI Eurozone ETF (EZU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IEV | EZU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.17 | 1.19 | -0.02 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.71 | 1.75 | -0.04 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.22 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.55 | 1.62 | -0.07 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.70 | 5.88 | -0.18 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IEV | EZU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.17 | 1.19 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 | 0.47 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 | 0.49 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.24 | 0.21 | +0.03 |
Drawdowns
IEV vs. EZU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IEV drawdown since its inception was -63.27%, roughly equal to the maximum EZU drawdown of -65.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IEV and EZU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IEV | EZU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.27% | -65.32% | +2.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.31% | -13.06% | +0.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.63% | -15.02% | +0.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.60% | -36.11% | +5.51% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.62% | -41.37% | +4.75% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.53% | 0.00% | -1.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.05% | -19.24% | +4.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.35% | 3.60% | -0.25% |
Volatility
IEV vs. EZU - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Europe ETF (IEV) is 5.77%, while iShares MSCI Eurozone ETF (EZU) has a volatility of 6.82%. This indicates that IEV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EZU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IEV | EZU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.77% | 6.82% | -1.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.89% | 14.07% | -1.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.58% | 16.89% | -1.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.56% | 19.85% | -2.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.66% | 20.49% | -1.83% |
IEV vs. EZU - Expense Ratio Comparison
IEV has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than EZU's 0.51% expense ratio.
Dividends
IEV vs. EZU - Dividend Comparison
IEV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.56%, less than EZU's 2.64% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EZU iShares MSCI Eurozone ETF | 2.64% | 2.85% | 2.90% | 2.56% | 2.79% | 2.46% | 2.13% | 2.84% | 3.47% | 1.91% | 3.07% | 2.18% |
IEV iShares Europe ETF | 2.56% | 2.73% | 3.10% | 2.77% | 3.06% | 2.81% | 1.76% | 3.06% | 3.43% | 2.39% | 3.08% | 2.81% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.97, IEV and EZU move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
EZU has higher volatility (6.82%) compared to IEV (5.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IEV dropped -63.27% vs EZU's -65.32%.
On 10-year performance, EZU leads with 9.96% vs 9.20% for IEV. On fees, EZU is cheaper at 0.51% per year. On volatility, IEV has been the lower-risk option at 5.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, EZU has performed better with a 9.96% return vs 9.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EZU is cheaper with a 0.51% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for IEV.
EZU has the higher dividend yield at 2.64%, compared with 2.56% for IEV.
IEV tracks S&P Europe 350 Index, while EZU tracks MSCI EMU. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for IEV and 0.51% for EZU.
EZU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.19 vs 1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IEV and EZU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer