IEV vs. EWJ
IEV (iShares Europe ETF) and EWJ (iShares MSCI Japan ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IEV is a Europe Equities fund tracking the S&P Europe 350 Index, while EWJ is a Japan Equities fund tracking the MSCI Japan Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IEV returned 9.15%/yr vs 9.28%/yr for EWJ. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IEV charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for EWJ.
Performance
IEV vs. EWJ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IEV achieves a 6.59% return, which is significantly lower than EWJ's 16.58% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IEV having a 9.15% annualized return and EWJ not far ahead at 9.28%.
IEV
- 1D
- 1.15%
- 1M
- 2.48%
- YTD
- 6.59%
- 6M
- 9.69%
- 1Y
- 18.09%
- 3Y*
- 16.65%
- 5Y*
- 8.80%
- 10Y*
- 9.15%
EWJ
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- 5.46%
- YTD
- 16.58%
- 6M
- 16.78%
- 1Y
- 32.89%
- 3Y*
- 18.51%
- 5Y*
- 8.84%
- 10Y*
- 9.28%
IEV vs. EWJ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IEV iShares Europe ETF | 6.59% | 35.63% | 1.36% | 20.14% | -14.24% | 16.73% | 4.07% | 24.03% | -14.68% | 24.84% |
EWJ iShares MSCI Japan ETF | 16.58% | 25.84% | 7.03% | 20.29% | -17.72% | 1.16% | 15.40% | 19.34% | -14.10% | 24.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between IEV and EWJ is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2000 | 0.65 |
The correlation between IEV and EWJ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.
IEV vs. EWJ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IEV
EWJ
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Technology
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Energy
Utilities
Communication Services
Real Estate
Financial Services
IEV
EWJ
Industrials
IEV
EWJ
Healthcare
IEV
EWJ
Technology
IEV
EWJ
Consumer Defensive
IEV
EWJ
Consumer Cyclical
IEV
EWJ
Basic Materials
IEV
EWJ
Energy
IEV
EWJ
Utilities
IEV
EWJ
Communication Services
IEV
EWJ
Real Estate
IEV
EWJ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IEV vs. EWJ — Risk / Return Rank
IEV
EWJ
IEV vs. EWJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Europe ETF (IEV) and iShares MSCI Japan ETF (EWJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IEV | EWJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.53 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.74 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.32 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.48 | 2.43 | -0.95 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.40 | 8.23 | -2.83 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IEV | EWJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.16 | 1.70 | -0.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 | 0.49 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 | 0.54 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.24 | 0.11 | +0.12 |
Drawdowns
IEV vs. EWJ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IEV drawdown since its inception was -63.27%, roughly equal to the maximum EWJ drawdown of -60.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IEV and EWJ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IEV | EWJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.27% | -60.93% | -2.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.31% | -13.59% | +1.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.63% | -14.68% | +0.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.60% | -33.14% | +2.54% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.62% | -33.14% | -3.48% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.65% | 0.00% | -1.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.04% | -21.74% | +6.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.36% | 4.01% | -0.65% |
Volatility
IEV vs. EWJ - Volatility Comparison
iShares Europe ETF (IEV) has a higher volatility of 5.56% compared to iShares MSCI Japan ETF (EWJ) at 4.21%. This indicates that IEV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EWJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IEV | EWJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.56% | 4.21% | +1.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.99% | 15.02% | -2.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.62% | 19.49% | -3.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.58% | 18.23% | -0.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.66% | 17.27% | +1.39% |
IEV vs. EWJ - Expense Ratio Comparison
IEV has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than EWJ's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
IEV vs. EWJ - Dividend Comparison
IEV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.56%, less than EWJ's 3.88% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWJ iShares MSCI Japan ETF | 3.88% | 4.52% | 2.34% | 2.03% | 1.23% | 2.08% | 1.04% | 2.03% | 1.71% | 1.25% | 1.95% | 1.27% |
IEV iShares Europe ETF | 2.56% | 2.73% | 3.10% | 2.77% | 3.06% | 2.81% | 1.76% | 3.06% | 3.43% | 2.39% | 3.08% | 2.81% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IEV and EWJ have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IEV has higher volatility (5.56%) compared to EWJ (4.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IEV dropped -63.27% vs EWJ's -60.93%.
On 10-year performance, EWJ leads with 9.28% vs 9.15% for IEV. On fees, EWJ is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, EWJ has been the lower-risk option at 4.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, EWJ has performed better with a 9.28% return vs 9.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EWJ is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for IEV.
EWJ has the higher dividend yield at 3.88%, compared with 2.56% for IEV.
IEV is categorized as Europe Equities, while EWJ is Japan Equities. IEV tracks S&P Europe 350 Index, while EWJ tracks MSCI Japan Index. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for IEV and 0.49% for EWJ.
EWJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.70 vs 1.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IEV and EWJ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer