IESC vs. SMMT
IESC (IES Holdings, Inc.) and SMMT (Summit Therapeutics Inc.) are both stocks. IESC operates in Engineering & Construction (Industrials), while SMMT operates in Biotechnology (Healthcare). Over the past 10 years, IESC returned 48.95%/yr vs 4.15%/yr for SMMT. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
IESC vs. SMMT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IESC achieves a 88.91% return, which is significantly higher than SMMT's -19.33% return. Over the past 10 years, IESC has outperformed SMMT with an annualized return of 48.95%, while SMMT has yielded a comparatively lower 4.15% annualized return.
IESC
- 1D
- 1.97%
- 1M
- 10.23%
- YTD
- 88.91%
- 6M
- 66.06%
- 1Y
- 162.49%
- 3Y*
- 140.27%
- 5Y*
- 69.06%
- 10Y*
- 48.95%
SMMT
- 1D
- -4.47%
- 1M
- -21.96%
- YTD
- -19.33%
- 6M
- -24.24%
- 1Y
- -31.47%
- 3Y*
- 100.52%
- 5Y*
- 13.84%
- 10Y*
- 4.15%
IESC vs. SMMT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IESC IES Holdings, Inc. | 88.91% | 93.58% | 153.67% | 122.72% | -29.76% | 9.99% | 79.42% | 65.02% | -9.86% | -9.92% |
SMMT Summit Therapeutics Inc. | -19.33% | -1.99% | 583.72% | -38.59% | 57.99% | -42.77% | 193.75% | 39.13% | -89.62% | 29.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between IESC and SMMT is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 5, 2015 | 0.13 |
Fundamentals
IESC:
$14.83B
SMMT:
$10.94B
IESC:
$18.85
SMMT:
-$1.60
IESC:
13.83
SMMT:
20.04
IESC:
$3.63B
SMMT:
$0.00
IESC:
$931.31M
SMMT:
-$83.36K
IESC:
$487.14M
SMMT:
-$738.34M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IESC vs. SMMT — Risk / Return Rank
IESC
SMMT
IESC vs. SMMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IES Holdings, Inc. (IESC) and Summit Therapeutics Inc. (SMMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IESC | SMMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.98 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 0.98 | +0.40 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.50 | -0.60 | +8.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 21.33 | -0.92 | +22.25 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IESC | SMMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.64 | -0.42 | +3.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.29 | 0.08 | +1.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.02 | 0.03 | +0.99 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.05 | 0.02 | +0.03 |
Drawdowns
IESC vs. SMMT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IESC drawdown since its inception was -98.32%, roughly equal to the maximum SMMT drawdown of -95.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IESC and SMMT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IESC | SMMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.32% | -95.75% | -2.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.80% | -52.76% | +30.96% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -49.23% | -62.26% | +13.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -54.22% | -91.78% | +37.56% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -54.28% | -95.75% | +41.47% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.97% | -61.55% | +60.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -55.01% | -57.64% | +2.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.66% | 34.32% | -26.66% |
Volatility
IESC vs. SMMT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for IES Holdings, Inc. (IESC) is 11.77%, while Summit Therapeutics Inc. (SMMT) has a volatility of 22.47%. This indicates that IESC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IESC | SMMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.77% | 22.47% | -10.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 49.79% | 56.53% | -6.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 62.06% | 75.95% | -13.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 53.94% | 185.12% | -131.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 48.10% | 144.63% | -96.53% |
Dividends
IESC vs. SMMT - Dividend Comparison
Neither IESC nor SMMT has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
IESC vs. SMMT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between IES Holdings, Inc. and Summit Therapeutics Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
IESC and SMMT have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SMMT has higher volatility (22.47%) compared to IESC (11.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IESC dropped -98.32% vs SMMT's -95.75%.
IESC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs -0.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IESC and SMMT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer