PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IESC vs. POWL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

IESC vs. POWL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in IES Holdings, Inc. (IESC) and Powell Industries, Inc. (POWL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IESC achieves a 88.91% return, which is significantly lower than POWL's 176.53% return. Over the past 10 years, IESC has outperformed POWL with an annualized return of 48.95%, while POWL has yielded a comparatively lower 40.62% annualized return.


IESC

1D
1.97%
1M
10.23%
YTD
88.91%
6M
66.06%
1Y
162.49%
3Y*
140.27%
5Y*
69.06%
10Y*
48.95%

POWL

1D
3.06%
1M
-5.07%
YTD
176.53%
6M
157.11%
1Y
362.43%
3Y*
142.81%
5Y*
94.52%
10Y*
40.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IESC vs. POWL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IESC
IES Holdings, Inc.
88.91%93.58%153.67%122.72%-29.76%9.99%79.42%65.02%-9.86%-9.92%
POWL
Powell Industries, Inc.
176.53%44.49%152.21%155.62%24.34%3.60%-37.60%101.58%-9.92%-24.00%

Correlation

The correlation between IESC and POWL is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.53

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 28, 1998

0.24

Over the past year, IESC and POWL have become more correlated (0.55) than their long-term average of 0.24, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

IESC:

$14.83B

POWL:

$10.73B

EPS

IESC:

$18.85

POWL:

$5.12

PE Ratio

IESC:

38.98

POWL:

57.36

PEG Ratio

IESC:

0.47

POWL:

0.09

PS Ratio

IESC:

4.08

POWL:

9.47

PB Ratio

IESC:

13.83

POWL:

15.13

Total Revenue (TTM)

IESC:

$3.63B

POWL:

$1.13B

Gross Profit (TTM)

IESC:

$931.31M

POWL:

$340.78M

EBITDA (TTM)

IESC:

$487.14M

POWL:

$236.11M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IESC vs. POWL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IESC
IESC Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
IESC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IESC Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
IESC Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
IESC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
IESC Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

POWL
POWL Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
POWL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
POWL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
POWL Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
POWL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
POWL Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IESC vs. POWL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IES Holdings, Inc. (IESC) and Powell Industries, Inc. (POWL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IESCPOWLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.60

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.62

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.50

11.83

-4.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

21.33

37.87

-16.54

IESC vs. POWL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IESC Sharpe Ratio is 2.64, which is lower than the POWL Sharpe Ratio of 6.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IESC and POWL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IESCPOWLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.64

6.24

-3.60

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.29

1.48

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.02

0.75

+0.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.05

0.29

-0.23

Drawdowns

IESC vs. POWL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IESC drawdown since its inception was -98.32%, which is greater than POWL's maximum drawdown of -73.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IESC and POWL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IESCPOWLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.32%

-73.10%

-25.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.80%

-30.88%

+9.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-49.23%

-55.76%

+6.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-54.22%

-55.76%

+1.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-54.28%

-68.85%

+14.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.97%

-8.80%

+7.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-55.01%

-36.11%

-18.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.66%

9.63%

-1.97%

Volatility

IESC vs. POWL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for IES Holdings, Inc. (IESC) is 11.77%, while Powell Industries, Inc. (POWL) has a volatility of 15.85%. This indicates that IESC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than POWL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IESCPOWLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.77%

15.85%

-4.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

49.79%

42.91%

+6.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

62.06%

58.63%

+3.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

53.94%

64.11%

-10.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

48.10%

54.69%

-6.59%

Dividends

IESC vs. POWL - Dividend Comparison

IESC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while POWL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IESC
IES Holdings, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
POWL
Powell Industries, Inc.
0.12%0.34%0.48%1.19%2.96%3.53%3.53%2.12%4.16%3.63%2.67%4.00%

Financials

IESC vs. POWL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between IES Holdings, Inc. and Powell Industries, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M1.00B20222023202420252026
974.20M
296.62M
(IESC) Total Revenue
(POWL) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

IESC vs. POWL - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between IES Holdings, Inc. and Powell Industries, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%15.0%20.0%25.0%30.0%20222023202420252026
24.5%
29.7%
Portfolio components
IESC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, IES Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 238.70M and revenue of 974.20M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 24.5%.

POWL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Powell Industries, Inc. reported a gross profit of 87.94M and revenue of 296.62M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 29.7%.

IESC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, IES Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 112.30M and revenue of 974.20M, resulting in an operating margin of 11.5%.

POWL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Powell Industries, Inc. reported an operating income of 57.58M and revenue of 296.62M, resulting in an operating margin of 19.4%.

IESC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, IES Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 110.00M and revenue of 974.20M, resulting in a net margin of 11.3%.

POWL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Powell Industries, Inc. reported a net income of 45.89M and revenue of 296.62M, resulting in a net margin of 15.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


IESC and POWL have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

POWL has higher volatility (15.85%) compared to IESC (11.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IESC dropped -98.32% vs POWL's -73.10%.

POWL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.24 vs 2.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IESC and POWL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer