PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IESC vs. CARE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

IESC vs. CARE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in IES Holdings, Inc. (IESC) and Carter Bankshares, Inc. (CARE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IESC achieves a 92.75% return, which is significantly higher than CARE's 52.54% return. Over the past 10 years, IESC has outperformed CARE with an annualized return of 48.97%, while CARE has yielded a comparatively lower 9.15% annualized return.


IESC

1D
2.53%
1M
9.91%
YTD
92.75%
6M
62.95%
1Y
186.31%
3Y*
139.60%
5Y*
70.53%
10Y*
48.97%

CARE

1D
1.07%
1M
10.36%
YTD
52.54%
6M
50.09%
1Y
84.66%
3Y*
23.55%
5Y*
16.01%
10Y*
9.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IESC vs. CARE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IESC
IES Holdings, Inc.
92.75%93.58%153.67%122.72%-29.76%9.99%79.42%65.02%-9.86%-9.92%
CARE
Carter Bankshares, Inc.
52.54%11.77%17.50%-9.76%7.80%43.56%-54.48%58.13%-14.53%32.05%

Correlation

The correlation between IESC and CARE is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.28

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 27, 2012

0.22

Fundamentals

Market Cap

IESC:

$15.14B

CARE:

$652.68M

EPS

IESC:

$18.85

CARE:

$4.87

PE Ratio

IESC:

39.78

CARE:

6.13

PEG Ratio

IESC:

0.48

CARE:

0.43

PS Ratio

IESC:

4.17

CARE:

2.07

PB Ratio

IESC:

14.11

CARE:

1.29

Total Revenue (TTM)

IESC:

$3.63B

CARE:

$319.93M

Gross Profit (TTM)

IESC:

$931.31M

CARE:

$256.97M

EBITDA (TTM)

IESC:

$487.14M

CARE:

$142.80M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IESC vs. CARE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IESC
IESC Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
IESC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IESC Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
IESC Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
IESC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
IESC Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

CARE
CARE Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
CARE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CARE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
CARE Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
CARE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
CARE Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IESC vs. CARE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IES Holdings, Inc. (IESC) and Carter Bankshares, Inc. (CARE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IESCCAREDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.87

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.53

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

8.09

5.06

+3.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

22.98

14.55

+8.43

IESC vs. CARE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IESC Sharpe Ratio is 2.81, which is comparable to the CARE Sharpe Ratio of 3.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IESC and CARE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IESC vs. CARE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IESC drawdown since its inception was -98.32%, which is greater than CARE's maximum drawdown of -73.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IESC and CARE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IESCCAREDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.32%

-73.17%

-25.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.80%

-15.83%

-5.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-49.23%

-35.75%

-13.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-54.22%

-42.95%

-11.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-54.28%

-73.17%

+18.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-54.97%

-19.46%

-35.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.66%

5.50%

+2.16%

Volatility

IESC vs. CARE - Volatility Comparison

IES Holdings, Inc. (IESC) has a higher volatility of 15.69% compared to Carter Bankshares, Inc. (CARE) at 8.65%. This indicates that IESC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CARE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IESCCAREDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.69%

8.65%

+7.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

50.65%

18.11%

+32.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

62.74%

26.45%

+36.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

54.09%

31.05%

+23.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

48.19%

36.81%

+11.38%

Dividends

IESC vs. CARE - Dividend Comparison

IESC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CARE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CARE
Carter Bankshares, Inc.
0.33%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.31%0.00%0.00%0.00%2.26%2.96%
IESC
IES Holdings, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

IESC vs. CARE - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between IES Holdings, Inc. and Carter Bankshares, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M1.00B20222023202420252026
974.20M
130.16M
(IESC) Total Revenue
(CARE) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


IESC and CARE have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IESC has higher volatility (15.69%) compared to CARE (8.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IESC dropped -98.32% vs CARE's -73.17%.

CARE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.03 vs 2.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IESC and CARE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer