PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IEO vs. XOP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IEO vs. XOP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares U.S. Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF (IEO) and SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF (XOP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with IEO having a 34.59% return and XOP slightly higher at 36.08%. Over the past 10 years, IEO has outperformed XOP with an annualized return of 10.42%, while XOP has yielded a comparatively lower 3.80% annualized return.


IEO

1D
1.66%
1M
-3.23%
YTD
34.59%
6M
26.42%
1Y
40.11%
3Y*
16.01%
5Y*
18.96%
10Y*
10.42%

XOP

1D
1.35%
1M
-5.46%
YTD
36.08%
6M
26.81%
1Y
41.73%
3Y*
14.10%
5Y*
14.86%
10Y*
3.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IEO vs. XOP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IEO
iShares U.S. Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF
34.59%2.15%-1.45%3.57%57.82%75.57%-32.77%9.63%-19.44%0.33%
XOP
SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF
36.08%-2.15%-1.00%3.56%45.37%66.74%-36.40%-9.44%-28.10%-9.47%

Correlation

The correlation between IEO and XOP is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2006

0.97

The correlation between IEO and XOP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

IEO vs. XOP - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IEO
XOP

Energy

99.3%
97.2%

Basic Materials

0.7%
2.9%

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Energy

IEO
99.3%
XOP
97.2%

Basic Materials

IEO
0.7%
XOP
2.9%

Communication Services

IEO

-

XOP

-

Consumer Cyclical

IEO

-

XOP

-

Consumer Defensive

IEO

-

XOP

-

Financial Services

IEO

-

XOP

-

Healthcare

IEO

-

XOP

-

Industrials

IEO

-

XOP

-

Real Estate

IEO

-

XOP

-

Technology

IEO

-

XOP

-

Utilities

IEO

-

XOP

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IEO vs. XOP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IEO
IEO Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
IEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
IEO Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
IEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
IEO Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

XOP
XOP Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
XOP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XOP Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
XOP Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
XOP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
XOP Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IEO vs. XOP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF (IEO) and SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF (XOP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IEOXOPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.25

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.82

2.77

+0.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.63

7.10

+0.53

IEO vs. XOP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IEO Sharpe Ratio is 1.61, which is comparable to the XOP Sharpe Ratio of 1.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IEO and XOP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IEOXOPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.61

1.51

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

0.44

+0.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.30

0.09

+0.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.17

0.06

+0.11

Drawdowns

IEO vs. XOP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IEO drawdown since its inception was -79.17%, smaller than the maximum XOP drawdown of -90.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IEO and XOP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IEOXOPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-79.17%

-90.27%

+11.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.30%

-15.14%

+0.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.46%

-34.98%

+3.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.46%

-34.98%

+3.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-75.00%

-82.61%

+7.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.30%

-36.40%

+29.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-26.27%

-42.59%

+16.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.28%

5.90%

-0.62%

Volatility

IEO vs. XOP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares U.S. Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF (IEO) is 9.32%, while SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF (XOP) has a volatility of 10.03%. This indicates that IEO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XOP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IEOXOPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.32%

10.03%

-0.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.86%

21.64%

-1.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.15%

27.81%

-2.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.54%

33.88%

-3.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.00%

40.28%

-5.28%

IEO vs. XOP - Expense Ratio Comparison

IEO has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than XOP's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

IEO vs. XOP - Dividend Comparison

IEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.97%, more than XOP's 1.90% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IEO
iShares U.S. Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF
1.97%2.61%2.63%3.00%3.77%2.62%3.17%1.85%1.67%0.94%0.98%2.03%
XOP
SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF
1.90%2.62%2.45%2.63%2.47%1.61%2.34%1.47%0.99%0.76%0.76%2.21%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, IEO and XOP move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

XOP has higher volatility (10.03%) compared to IEO (9.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IEO dropped -79.17% vs XOP's -90.27%.

On 10-year performance, IEO leads with 10.42% vs 3.80% for XOP. On fees, XOP is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, IEO has been the lower-risk option at 9.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IEO has performed better with a 10.42% return vs 3.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XOP is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for IEO.

IEO has the higher dividend yield at 1.97%, compared with 1.90% for XOP.

IEO tracks Dow Jones U.S. Select Oil Exploration & Production Index, while XOP tracks S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Select Industry. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for IEO and 0.35% for XOP.

IEO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.61 vs 1.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IEO and XOP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer