PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IEMG vs. VCIT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IEMG vs. VCIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG) and Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IEMG achieves a 22.84% return, which is significantly higher than VCIT's 0.41% return. Over the past 10 years, IEMG has outperformed VCIT with an annualized return of 10.42%, while VCIT has yielded a comparatively lower 2.93% annualized return.


IEMG

1D
0.61%
1M
0.63%
YTD
22.84%
6M
25.59%
1Y
42.50%
3Y*
21.33%
5Y*
7.15%
10Y*
10.42%

VCIT

1D
-0.07%
1M
0.28%
YTD
0.41%
6M
0.89%
1Y
5.54%
3Y*
6.37%
5Y*
1.11%
10Y*
2.93%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IEMG vs. VCIT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IEMG
iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
22.84%32.56%6.50%11.52%-19.98%-0.64%17.87%17.81%-14.92%37.38%
VCIT
Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF
0.41%9.34%3.20%8.98%-13.98%-1.77%9.46%14.10%-1.74%5.31%

Correlation

The correlation between IEMG and VCIT is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2012

0.13

Over the past year, IEMG and VCIT have become more correlated (0.39) than their long-term average of 0.13, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IEMG vs. VCIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IEMG
IEMG Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
IEMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IEMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
IEMG Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
IEMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
IEMG Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

VCIT
VCIT Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
VCIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VCIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
VCIT Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
VCIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
VCIT Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IEMG vs. VCIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG) and Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IEMGVCITDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.66

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.63

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.24

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.23

1.88

+1.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.89

6.07

+5.81

IEMG vs. VCIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IEMG Sharpe Ratio is 2.03, which is higher than the VCIT Sharpe Ratio of 1.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IEMG and VCIT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IEMG vs. VCIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IEMG drawdown since its inception was -38.71%, which is greater than VCIT's maximum drawdown of -20.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IEMG and VCIT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IEMGVCITDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.71%

-20.56%

-18.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.21%

-2.96%

-10.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.21%

-6.11%

-11.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.75%

-20.56%

-15.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.71%

-20.56%

-18.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.98%

-1.13%

-2.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.95%

-3.16%

-9.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.59%

0.92%

+2.67%

Volatility

IEMG vs. VCIT - Volatility Comparison

iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG) has a higher volatility of 10.60% compared to Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCIT) at 1.48%. This indicates that IEMG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VCIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IEMGVCITDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.60%

1.48%

+9.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.89%

3.15%

+15.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.08%

4.10%

+16.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.73%

6.62%

+12.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.17%

6.28%

+13.89%

IEMG vs. VCIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

IEMG has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than VCIT's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IEMG vs. VCIT - Dividend Comparison

IEMG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.24%, less than VCIT's 4.79% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IEMG
iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
2.24%2.75%3.20%2.89%2.71%3.06%1.87%3.15%2.76%2.35%2.28%2.53%
VCIT
Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF
4.79%4.62%4.43%3.72%3.03%2.87%2.78%3.37%3.61%3.21%3.29%3.34%

Frequently Asked Questions


IEMG and VCIT have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IEMG has higher volatility (10.60%) compared to VCIT (1.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IEMG dropped -38.71% vs VCIT's -20.56%.

On 10-year performance, IEMG leads with 10.42% vs 2.93% for VCIT. On fees, VCIT is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VCIT has been the lower-risk option at 1.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IEMG has performed better with a 10.42% return vs 2.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VCIT is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for IEMG.

VCIT has the higher dividend yield at 4.79%, compared with 2.24% for IEMG.

IEMG is categorized as Emerging Markets Diversified, while VCIT is Corporate Bonds. IEMG tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index (USD) (Net), while VCIT tracks Bloomberg U.S. 5-10 Year Corporate Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for IEMG and 0.03% for VCIT.

IEMG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs 1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IEMG and VCIT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer