IEMG vs. SMH
IEMG (iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF) and SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IEMG is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index (USD) (Net), while SMH is a Semiconductors fund tracking the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IEMG returned 10.64%/yr vs 38.22%/yr for SMH. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IEMG charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for SMH.
Performance
IEMG vs. SMH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IEMG achieves a 28.41% return, which is significantly lower than SMH's 83.23% return. Over the past 10 years, IEMG has underperformed SMH with an annualized return of 10.64%, while SMH has yielded a comparatively higher 38.22% annualized return.
IEMG
- 1D
- 3.14%
- 1M
- 7.13%
- YTD
- 28.41%
- 6M
- 30.61%
- 1Y
- 52.54%
- 3Y*
- 22.63%
- 5Y*
- 8.51%
- 10Y*
- 10.64%
SMH
- 1D
- 5.76%
- 1M
- 14.50%
- YTD
- 83.23%
- 6M
- 85.82%
- 1Y
- 154.33%
- 3Y*
- 63.38%
- 5Y*
- 40.67%
- 10Y*
- 38.22%
IEMG vs. SMH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IEMG iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF | 28.41% | 32.56% | 6.50% | 11.52% | -19.98% | -0.64% | 17.87% | 17.81% | -14.92% | 37.38% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 83.23% | 49.17% | 39.10% | 73.38% | -33.53% | 42.13% | 55.53% | 64.45% | -9.05% | 38.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between IEMG and SMH is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2012 | 0.64 |
The correlation between IEMG and SMH shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (all time) to 0.77 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
IEMG vs. SMH - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IEMG
SMH
Technology
Financial Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Industrials
-
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
IEMG
SMH
Financial Services
IEMG
SMH
-
Consumer Cyclical
IEMG
SMH
-
Industrials
IEMG
SMH
-
Basic Materials
IEMG
SMH
-
Communication Services
IEMG
SMH
-
Energy
IEMG
SMH
-
Healthcare
IEMG
SMH
-
Consumer Defensive
IEMG
SMH
-
Utilities
IEMG
SMH
-
Real Estate
IEMG
SMH
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IEMG vs. SMH — Risk / Return Rank
IEMG
SMH
IEMG vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IEMG | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.39 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.64 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.92 | 10.25 | -6.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.41 | 37.49 | -23.08 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IEMG vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IEMG drawdown since its inception was -38.71%, smaller than the maximum SMH drawdown of -84.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IEMG and SMH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IEMG | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.71% | -84.96% | +46.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.21% | -14.93% | +1.72% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.21% | -35.74% | +18.53% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.75% | -45.30% | +9.55% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.71% | -45.30% | +6.59% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.94% | -41.02% | +28.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.59% | 4.07% | -0.48% |
Volatility
IEMG vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG) is 10.76%, while VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) has a volatility of 17.53%. This indicates that IEMG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IEMG | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.76% | 17.53% | -6.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.32% | 28.48% | -9.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.41% | 34.09% | -12.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.83% | 35.67% | -16.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.22% | 32.94% | -12.72% |
IEMG vs. SMH - Expense Ratio Comparison
IEMG has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than SMH's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
IEMG vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison
IEMG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.10%, more than SMH's 0.17% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IEMG iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF | 2.10% | 2.75% | 3.20% | 2.89% | 2.71% | 3.06% | 1.87% | 3.15% | 2.76% | 2.35% | 2.28% | 2.53% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.17% | 0.31% | 0.44% | 0.60% | 1.18% | 0.51% | 0.69% | 1.50% | 1.88% | 1.43% | 0.80% | 2.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IEMG and SMH have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SMH has higher volatility (17.53%) compared to IEMG (10.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IEMG dropped -38.71% vs SMH's -84.96%.
On 10-year performance, SMH leads with 38.22% vs 10.64% for IEMG. On fees, IEMG is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, IEMG has been the lower-risk option at 10.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SMH has performed better with a 38.22% return vs 10.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IEMG is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for SMH.
IEMG has the higher dividend yield at 2.10%, compared with 0.17% for SMH.
IEMG is categorized as Emerging Markets Diversified, while SMH is Semiconductors. IEMG tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index (USD) (Net), while SMH tracks MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for IEMG and 0.35% for SMH.
SMH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.49 vs 2.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IEMG and SMH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer