IEMG vs. LEGR
IEMG (iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF) and LEGR (First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction & Process ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IEMG is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index (USD) (Net), while LEGR is a Blockchain fund tracking the Indxx Blockchain Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IEMG returned 7.15%/yr vs 11.61%/yr for LEGR. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IEMG charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for LEGR.
Performance
IEMG vs. LEGR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IEMG achieves a 22.84% return, which is significantly higher than LEGR's 11.18% return.
IEMG
- 1D
- 0.61%
- 1M
- 3.87%
- YTD
- 22.84%
- 6M
- 25.59%
- 1Y
- 44.83%
- 3Y*
- 21.33%
- 5Y*
- 7.15%
- 10Y*
- 10.42%
LEGR
- 1D
- 0.92%
- 1M
- 4.00%
- YTD
- 11.18%
- 6M
- 13.29%
- 1Y
- 28.16%
- 3Y*
- 22.32%
- 5Y*
- 11.61%
- 10Y*
- —
IEMG vs. LEGR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IEMG iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF | 22.84% | 32.56% | 6.50% | 11.52% | -19.98% | -0.64% | 17.87% | 17.81% | -21.83% |
LEGR First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction & Process ETF | 11.18% | 30.83% | 16.25% | 22.79% | -19.01% | 17.91% | 18.73% | 27.99% | -14.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between IEMG and LEGR is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 25, 2018 | 0.81 |
The correlation between IEMG and LEGR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.
IEMG vs. LEGR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IEMG
LEGR
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Energy
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Technology
IEMG
LEGR
Financial Services
IEMG
LEGR
Consumer Cyclical
IEMG
LEGR
Industrials
IEMG
LEGR
Basic Materials
IEMG
LEGR
Communication Services
IEMG
LEGR
Energy
IEMG
LEGR
Healthcare
IEMG
LEGR
Consumer Defensive
IEMG
LEGR
Utilities
IEMG
LEGR
Real Estate
IEMG
LEGR
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IEMG vs. LEGR — Risk / Return Rank
IEMG
LEGR
IEMG vs. LEGR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG) and First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction & Process ETF (LEGR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IEMG | LEGR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.34 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.23 | 2.64 | +0.59 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.89 | 9.72 | +2.17 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IEMG vs. LEGR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IEMG drawdown since its inception was -38.71%, which is greater than LEGR's maximum drawdown of -36.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IEMG and LEGR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IEMG | LEGR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.71% | -36.12% | -2.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.21% | -10.40% | -2.81% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.21% | -14.25% | -2.96% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.75% | -31.45% | -4.30% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.71% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.98% | -2.56% | -1.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.95% | -6.60% | -6.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.59% | 2.82% | +0.77% |
Volatility
IEMG vs. LEGR - Volatility Comparison
iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG) has a higher volatility of 10.60% compared to First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction & Process ETF (LEGR) at 5.87%. This indicates that IEMG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LEGR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IEMG | LEGR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.60% | 5.87% | +4.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.89% | 12.07% | +6.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.08% | 14.34% | +6.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.73% | 17.07% | +1.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.17% | 20.33% | -0.16% |
IEMG vs. LEGR - Expense Ratio Comparison
IEMG has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than LEGR's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
IEMG vs. LEGR - Dividend Comparison
IEMG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.24%, more than LEGR's 1.68% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IEMG iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF | 2.24% | 2.75% | 3.20% | 2.89% | 2.71% | 3.06% | 1.87% | 3.15% | 2.76% | 2.35% | 2.28% | 2.53% |
LEGR First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction & Process ETF | 1.68% | 1.84% | 2.40% | 2.56% | 2.64% | 1.80% | 0.95% | 2.04% | 1.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IEMG and LEGR have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IEMG has higher volatility (10.60%) compared to LEGR (5.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IEMG dropped -38.71% vs LEGR's -36.12%.
On 5-year performance, LEGR leads with 11.61% vs 7.15% for IEMG. On fees, IEMG is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, LEGR has been the lower-risk option at 5.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, LEGR has performed better with a 11.61% return vs 7.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IEMG is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for LEGR.
IEMG has the higher dividend yield at 2.24%, compared with 1.68% for LEGR.
IEMG is categorized as Emerging Markets Diversified, while LEGR is Blockchain. IEMG tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index (USD) (Net), while LEGR tracks Indxx Blockchain Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for IEMG and 0.65% for LEGR.
IEMG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs 1.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IEMG and LEGR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer